Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 219-233

  Goncalo, Jack A ^a   Duguid, Michelle M ^a  

^a and History   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal attribution; Decision making; Divergent thinking; Group serving bias; Knowledge exchange

Indexed keywords

EID: 53849133801     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Allport F.H. Social psychology (1924), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
2. Alpert M., and Raiffa H. A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Later published. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (Eds). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1969), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 294-305
3. Amabile T.A. The social psychology of creativity (1983), Springer-Verlag, New York
4. Asch S.E. Social psychology (1952), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
5. Asch S.E. Studies on independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs 70 (1956) 9
6. Audia P.G., and Brion S. Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2007) 255-269
7. Audia P.G., and Goncalo J.A. Success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard-disk drive industry. Management Science 53 (2007) 1-15
8. Bandura A. Self efficacy the exercise of control (1997), W.H. Freeman Company, USA
9. Beersma B., and De Dreu C.K.W. Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on post-negotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005) 358-374
10. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
11. Bradbury T.N., and Fincham F.D. Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 3-33
12. Brown R.B. Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (1988), Blackwell Publishers
13. Chatman J.A., Polzer J.T., Barsade S.G., and Neale M.A. Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (1998) 749-780
14. Choi H.S., and Thompson L. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98 (2005) 121-132
15. Cialdini R., Borden R., Thorne A., Walker M., Freeman S., and Sloan L. Basking in reflected glory; three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34 (1976) 366-375
16. Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., and Kallgren C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 1015-1026
17. Cialdini R.B., and Richardson K.D. Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 406-415
18. CNET NEWS.COM. (2005). Last accessed June 30.
19. Cyert R.M., and March J.G. A behavioral theory of the firm. 2nd ed. (1963), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
20. De Dreu C.K.W., and DeVries N.K. Differential processing and attitude change following majority and minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology 35 (1996) 77-90
21. Deutsch M., and Gerard H.B. A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 195 (1955) 629-636
22. Diehl M., and Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (1987) 722-735
23. Dietz-Uhler B., and Murrell A. of social identity and threat on self-esteem and group attribution. Group Dynamics 2 (1998) 24-35
24. Fletcher G.J.O., and Fincham F.D. Attribution process in close relationships. In: Fletcher G.J.O., and Fincham F.D. (Eds). Cognition in close relationships (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 7-35
25. Forsyth D.R., and Kelley K.N. Attribution in groups: Estimation of personal contributions to collective endeavors. Small Group Research 25 (1994) 367-383
26. Forsyth D.R., and Schlenker B.R. Attributing the causes of group performance: Effects of performance quality, task importance, and future testing. Journal of Personality 45 (1977) 220-236
27. Galinsky A.D., and Kray L.J. From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mindset on information sharing in groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 606-618
28. Gioia D.A., and Sims H.P. Self-serving bias and actor-observer differences in organizations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15 (1985) 547-563
29. Goncalo J.A. Past success and convergent thinking in groups: The role of group-focused attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology 34 (2004) 385-395
30. Goncalo, J. A. (2006). An attributional theory of convergent thinking in groups. In K. Mark Weaver (Ed.) Proceedings of the sixty-fifth annual meeting of the academy of management (CD), ISSN 1543-8643.
31. Goncalo, J. A. & Kandathil, G. M. (2007). Connecting group success to individual achievement: Cross-cultural attributions for group performance. In George T. Solomon (Ed.) Proceedings of the sixty sixth annual meeting of the academy of management (CD), ISSN.
32. Goncalo J.A., and Staw B.M. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 (2006) 96-109
33. Gruenfeld D.H., Mannix E.A., Williams K.Y., and Neale M.A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (1996) 1-15
34. Gruley, B. & Smith, R. (2002). Anatomy of a fall: Keys to success left Kenneth lay open to disaster. The Wall Street Journal.
35. Guilford. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin 33 (1956) 267-293
36. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. In: Lorsch J. (Ed). Handbook of organizational behavior (1987), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
37. Hall A.T., Royle T.M., Brymer R.A., Perrew P.L., Ferris G.R., and Hochwater W.A. Relationships between felt accountability as a stressor and strain reactions: The neutralizing role of autonomy across two studies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11 (2006) 87-99
38. Hays, K. (2004). I was clueless, Lay says. The Gazette: Montreal, Quebec.
39. Ilgen D.R. Teams embedded in organizations. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 129-138
40. Janis I.L. Groupthink. Psychology Today 5 (1971) 43-44
41. Janis I.L. Victims of groupthink. 2nd ed. (1982), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
42. Johns, G. (1999). A multi-level theory of self-serving behavior in and by organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 21, pp.1- 38).
43. Jonas E., Schulz-Hardt S., Frey D., and Thelen N. Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 557-571
44. Kasof J. Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal 10 (1997) 303-315
45. Kelley H.H. Attributions in social interactions (1971), General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ
46. Kingdon J.W. Politicians beliefs about voters. American Political Science Review 61 (1967) 137-145
47. Kray L.J., and Galinsky A.D. The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91 (2003) 69-81
48. Larey T.S., and Paulus P.B. Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal 12 (1999) 175-184
49. LeBon G. The crowd: A study of the popular mind (1895), Viking, New York
50. Lerner J., and Tetlock P.E. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 255-275
51. Levitt, B. & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. In W. R. Scott & J. F. Short, Jr. (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 14, pp. 319-340). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
52. Lewin K. Field theory in social science (1952), Harper and Row, New York
53. Liljenquist K.A., Galinsky A.D., and Kray L.J. Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities with myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mindsets for information sharing and group coordination. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17 (2004) 263-279
54. Lindsley D.H., Brass D., and Thomas J.B. Efficacy performance spirals: A multi- level perspective. Academy of Management Review 17 (1995) 183-211
55. Locke E., Tirnauer D., Roberson Q., Goldman B., and Weldon E. The importance of the individual in an age of groupism. In: Turner M. (Ed). Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
56. March J.G., and Simon H.A. Organizations (1958), Wiley, New York
57. March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1991) 71-87
58. Mayer R.E. Thinking, problem solving, cognition (1992), Worth, New York, NY
59. McGrath J.E. Social psychology: A brief introduction (1964), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York
60. Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69 (1962) 230-232
61. Mischel L.J., and Northcraft G.B. I think we can, I think we can: The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. Advances in Group Processes 14 (1997) 177-197
62. Miller D.T., and Ross M. Self serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?. Psychological Bulletin 82 (1975) 213-225
63. Naquin C.E., and Tynan R.O. The team halo effect: Why teams are not blamed for their failures. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 332-340
64. Nelson R.R., and Winter S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change (1982), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
65. Nemeth C.J. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 23-32
66. Nemeth C.J., and Rogers JR. Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology 25 (1996) 67-76
67. Nemeth, C. J. & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in small groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 175-210).
68. Newman H.M. Communication within ongoing intimate relationships: An attributional perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7 (1981) 59-70
69. Nijstad B.A., Stroebe W., and Lodewijkx H.F.M. Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2002) 535-544
70. North, N. (1991). Floating Stock. In W. Shortz (Ed.), The Giant Book of Games (pp. 100-102).
71. O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment. In L. L. Cummings & B. M Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (p. 18).
72. Oyserman D., Coon H.M., and Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 3-72
73. Paulus P.B., and Yang H.C. Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (2000) 76-87
74. Peterson R., and Nemeth C. Focus vs. flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 14-23
75. Peterson R., Owens P.M., Tetlock P.E., Fan E., and Martorana P. Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of failure and success in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73 (1998) 77-99
76. Phillips K.W. The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 3-13
77. Phillips K.W., and Loyd D.L. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99 (2006) 143-160
78. Phillips K.Y., Mannix E.A., Neale M.A., and Gruenfeld D.H. Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 497-510
79. Phillips K.W., Northcraft G., and Neale M.A. Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help?. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9 (2006) 467-482
80. Postmes T., Spears R., and Cihangir S. Quality of group decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 918-930
81. Ratner R.K., and Herbst K.C. When good decisions have bad outcomes: The impact of affect on switching behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96 (2005) 23-37
82. Salancik G.R., and Meindl J.R. Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1984) 238-254
83. Schachter S. Deviation, rejection and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46 (1951) 190-207
84. Scholten L., van Knippenberg D., Nijstad B., and De Dreu C.K.W. Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007) 539-552
85. Schulz-Hardt S., Frey D., Luthgens C., and Moscovici S. Biased information processing search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (2000) 665-669
86. Seashore S.E. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group (1954), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
87. Sherif M. A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology 27 (1935) 187
88. Sherif M. The psychology of social norms (1936), Harper and Row, New York
89. Stasser G., and Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1992) 67-78
90. Stasser G., and Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Bias information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 1467-1478
91. Staw B.M. Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A new alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13 (1975) 414-432
92. Staw B.M., McKechnie P.I., and Puffer S.M. The justification of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (1983) 582-600
93. Stewart D.D., Billings R.S., and Stasser G. Accountability and the discussion of unshared critical information in decision making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1998) 619-628
94. Stewart D.D., and Stasser G. Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 619-628
95. Swann W.B., Kwan V.S.Y., Polzer J.T., and Milton L.P. Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 1396-1406
96. Taylor S.E., and Brown J.D. Illusion of well being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 193-210
97. Taylor D.M., and Tyler J.K. Group members' responses to group-serving attributions for success and failure. The Journal of Social Psychology 126 (1986) 775-781
98. Van Swol L.M., Savadori L., and Sniezek J.A. Factors that may affect the difficulty of uncovering hidden profiles. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6 (2003) 285-304
99. Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92 (1985) 548-573
100. Weingart L. How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. In: Cummings L.L., and Staw B.M. (Eds). Research in organizational behavior Vol. 19 (1997), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 189-239
101. Whyte G. Recasting Janis's groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73 (1998) 185-209
102. Williams K., Harkins S., and Latane B. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (1981) 303-311
103. Wittenbaum G.M., Hubbell A., and Zuckerman C. Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1999) 967-978
104. Wittenbaum G.M., and Park E.S. The collective preference for shared information. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (2001) 72-75
105. Wittenbaum G.M., and Stasser G. Management of information in small groups. In: Nye J.L., and Brower A.M. (Eds). What's social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (1996), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 3-28
106. Zaccaro S.J., Peterson C., and Walker S. Self-serving attributions for individual and group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (1987) 257-263
107. Zuckerman M. Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is still alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality 47 (1979) 245-287