Host-dependent phenotypic plasticity of aedeagus morphology in a pair of cactophilic sibling Drosophila species of the repleta group (Diptera, Drosophilidae)

Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 368-373

  Soto, I M ^a   Manfrin, M H ^b   Hasson, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aedeagus; Cactus; Fourier descriptors

Indexed keywords

CACTUS; DIVERGENCE; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; HOST PLANT; HOST USE; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; REARING; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMALIA; CACTACEAE; CEREUS HILDMANNIANUS; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA ANTONIETAE; DROSOPHILA BUZZATII; DROSOPHILA GOUVEAI; DROSOPHILA REPLETA; DROSOPHILIDAE; PILOSOCEREUS MACHRISII; REPLETA GROUP;

EID: 53849119511     PISSN: 09475745     EISSN: 14390469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00467.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrade CAC, Hatadania LM, Klaczko LB (2005) Phenotypic plasticity of the aedeagus of Drosophila mediopunctata: effect of the temperature. J Therm Biol 30 : 518 523.
2. Arnqvist G (1997) The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol J Linn Soc 60 : 365 379.
3. Arnqvist G, Thornhill R (1998) Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition-dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in a water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Genet Res 71 : 193 212.
4. Carreira VP, Soto IM, Hasson E, Fanara JJ (2006) Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae. J Evol Biol 9 : 1275 1282.
5. Dambroski HR, Linn C, Berlocher SH, Forbes AA, Roelofs W, Feder JL (2005) The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts. Evolution 59 : 1953 1964.
6. De Brito RA., Manfrin MH, Sene FM (2002) Nested cladistic analysis of Brazilian populations of Drosophila serido. Mol Phylogenet Evol 22 : 131 143.
7. Dufour L (1844) Anatomie générale des Diptères. Annuaire de Science Naturelle 1 : 244 264.
8. Eberhard WG (1993) Evaluating models of sexual selection: genitalia as a test case. Am Nat 142 : 564 571.
9. Etges WJ (1990) Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis. In : Barker JSF, Starmer WT, MacIntyre RJ (eds Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 37 56.
10. Etges WJ (1993) Genetics of Host-Cactus Response and Life-History Evolution among Ancestral and Derived Populations of Cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 47 : 750 767.
11. Fanara JJ, Hasson E (2001) Oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae on their natural hosts. Evolution 55 : 2615 2619.
12. Fanara JJ, Fontdevila A, Hasson E (1999) Oviposition preference, viability, developmental time and body size in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural hosts. Evol Ecol 13 : 173 190.
13. Fanara JJ, Mensch J, Folguera G, Hasson E (2004) Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts. Evol Ecol 18 : 203 214.
14. Hawthorne DJ, Via S (2001) Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412 : 904 907.
15. Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19 : 8793.
16. Hribar LJ (1996) Larval rearing temperature affects morphology of Anopheles albimanus (Diptera:Culicidae) male genitalia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12 : 295 297.
17. Iwata H, Ukai Y (2002) SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered 93 : 384 385.
18. Kobayashi T (1998) Seasonal changes in body size and male genital structures of Procladius choreus (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanypodinae). Aquat Insects 20 : 165 172.
19. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 18 : 236 258.
20. Manfrin MH, Sene FM (2006) Cactophilic Drosophila in South America: a model for evolutionary studies. Genetica 126 : 57 75.
21. Manfrin MH, De Brito ROA, Sene FM (2001) Systematics and evolution of the Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) cluster using mtDNA. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94 : 333 346.
22. Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Monteiro SG, Sene FM (1995) Estudo morfométrico de populações de Drosophila serido das regiões Central e Sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Genet 18 : 283.
24. Pereira MAQR, Vilela CR, Sene FM (1983) Notes on breeding and feeding sites of some species of the repleta group of the genus Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Cien Cult 35 : 1313 1319.
25. Rohlf FJ, Archie JW (1984) A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst Biol 33 : 302 317.
26. Shapiro AM, Porter AH (1989) The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annu Rev Entomol 34 : 231 245.
27. Silva AFG, Sene FM (1991) Morphological geographic variability in Drosophila serido (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev Bras Ent 35 : 455 468.
28. Soto IM (2005) Use of elliptic Fourier descriptors for quantification of male genitalia morphology. Dros Inf Serv 88 : 42 45.
29. Soto IM, Carreira VP, Fanara JJ, Hasson E (2007a) Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affecting genital morphology in sibling Drosophila species and their hybrids. BMC Evol Biol 7 : 77.
30. Soto IM, Hasson E, Manfrin MH (2007b) Wing morphology is related to host plants in cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and D. antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond (in press).
31. Soto IM, Manfrin MH, Sene FM, Hasson E (2007c) Viability and developmental time in the cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and D. antonietae (Diptera: Drosophilidae) are dependent of the cactus host. Ann Entomol Soc Am 4 : 490 496.
32. StatSoft, Inc 2001) STATISTICA, Data Analysis Software System (version 6; available at http://www.statsoft.com).
33. Stennett MD, Etges WJ (1997) Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J Chem Ecol 23 : 2803 2824.
34. Tidon-Sklorz R, Sene FM (2001) Two new species of the Drosophila serido sibling set (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Iheringia Ser Zool 90 : 141 146.
35. Vilela CR (1983) A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev Bras Entomol 27 : 1 114.
36. Vilela CR, Sene FM (1977) Two new neotropical species of the repleta group of the genus Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Papeis Avulsos Zool 30 : 295 299.