Evolution of male genitalia: Environmental and genetic factors affect genital morphology in two Drosophila sibling species and their hybrids

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Soto, Ignacio M ^a   Carreira, Valeria P ^a   Fanara, Juan J ^a   Hasson, Esteban ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA BUZZATII; DROSOPHILA KOEPFERAE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEREDITY; HYBRID; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ORGAN SIZE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CACTACEAE; DROSOPHILA BUZZATII; DROSOPHILA KOEPFERAE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENITALIA, MALE; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34249674301     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-77     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila. JA Coyne, Evolution 1983 37 1101 1118 10.2307/2408834
2. WG Eberhard, Sexual selection and animal genitalia Harvard Univ. Press: Cambridge, MA 1985
3. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. G Arnqvist, Biol J Linn Soc Lond 1997 60 365 379 10.1006/bijl.1996.0109
4. Gradual evolution of male genitalia in a sibling species complex of millipedes. JE Bond DA Beamer MC Hedin P Sierwald, Invertebr Syst 2003 17 711 717 10.1071/IS03026
5. Sexual selection and genital evolution. DJ Hosken P Stockley, Trends Ecol Evol 2004 19 87 93 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.012 16701234
6. A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). CR Vilela, Rev Bras Entomol 1983 1 114
7. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. G Arnqvist, Nature 1998 393 784 786 10.1038/31689
8. Anatomie générale des Diptères. L Dufour, Annuaire de Science Naturelle 1844 1 244 264
9. A resolution of the lek paradox. A Pomiankowski AP Möller, Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1995 260 21 29 10.1098/rspb.1995.0054
10. E Mayr, Animal species and evolution Harvard University Pess: Cambridge, MA, USA 1963
11. Animal genitalia and female choice. WG Eberhard, Am Sci 1990 78 134 141
12. Phenotypic plasticity of the aedeagus of Drosophila mediopunctata: Effect of the temperature. CAC Andrade LM Hatadani LB Klaczko, J Therm Biol 2005 30 518 523 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2005.05.011
13. Evolution of animal genitalia: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition-dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in a water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae). G Arnqvist R Thornhill, Genet Res 1998 71 193 212 10.1017/S0016672398003279
14. Evidence of genetic isolation between sexually monomorphic and sexually dimorphic traits in the water strider Aquaruis remigis. RF Preziosi DA Roff, Heredity 1998 81 92 99 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00380.x
15. Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. CM House LW Simmons, Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 2003 270 447 455 10.1098/rspb.2002.2266
16. Behavioral and nonecological isolation in Speciation. JA Coyne HA Orr, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts USA 2004 231 232 15495663
17. Genetic Architecture of a Morphological Shape Difference Between Two Drosophila Species. Z Zeng J Liu LF Stam C Kao JM Mercer CC Laurie, Genetics 2001 54 299 310
18. Online Dictionary of Invertebrate Zoology: Complete Work. AR Maggenti S Gardner, University of Nebraska - Lincoln 2005 http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ onlinedictinvertzoology/2
19. Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group. M Wasserman, Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Krimbas CB, Powell JR, 1992 455 552
20. Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex. A Ruiz M Wasserman, Heredity 1993 70 582 596 8335477
21. Oviposition preference, viability, developmental time and body size in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural hosts. JJ Fanara A Fontdevila E Hasson, Evol Ecol 1999 13 173 190 10.1023/A:1006636025623
22. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii XII. The genetic basis of sterility in hybrids between D. buzzatii its sibling D. serido from Argentina. H Naveira A Fontdevila, Genetics 1986 114 841 857 17246354
23. Drosophila koepferae new member of the Drosophila serido (Diptera, Drosophilidae) superspecies taxon. A Fontdevila C Pla E Hasson M Wasserman A Sanchez H Naveira A Ruiz, Ann Entomol Soc Am 1988 81 380 385
24. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXIV: Second chromosome inversions have different average effect on thorax length. E Hasson JJ Fanara C Rodríguez JC Vilardi OA Reig A Fontdevila, Heredity 1992 68 557 563 1612928
25. Stable Drosophila buzzati-Drosophila koepferae hybrids. I Marín A Fontdevila, J Hered 1998 89 336 339 10.1093/jhered/89.4.336 9703688
26. Transpecific polymorphisms in an inversion linked esterase locus in Drosophila buzzatii. GA Gómez E Hasson, Mol Biol Evol 2003 20 410 423 10.1093/molbev/msg051 12644562
27. Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae. R Piccinali M Aguadé E Hasson, Mol Biol Evol 2004 21 141 152 10.1093/molbev/msh006 14595098
28. Macrogeographic patterns in the inversion polymorphisms of Drosophila buzzatii in New World populations. E Hasson C Rodríguez JJ Fanara H Naveira OA Reig A Fontdevila, J Evol Biol 1995 8 369 384 10.1046/j.1420-9101. 1995.8030369.x
29. Are Opuntia hosts a selective factor for the inversion polymorphism? JJ Fanara E Hasson C Rodriguez M Santos A Fontdevila, Heredity 1996 77 500 508 8939019
30. Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations. JR David P Gibert H Legout G Pétavy P Capy B Moreteau, Heredity 2005 94 3 12 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800562 15329665
31. Reproductive relationships among ten species of the Drosophila repleta group from South America from the West Indies. I Marín A Ruiz C Pla A Fontdevila, Evolution 1993 47 1616 1624 10.2307/2410173
32. The Drosophila serido speciation puzzle: putting new pieces together. A Ruiz AM Cansian GC Kuhn MA Alves FM Sene, Genetica 2000 108 3 217 227 10.1023/A:1004195007178 11294608
33. Cactophilic Drosophila in South America: A Model for Evolutionary Studies. MH Manfrin FM Sene, Genetica 2006 126 57 75 10.1007/s10709-005-1432-5 16502085
34. Systematics and Evolution of the Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Cluster Using mtDNA. MH Manfrin ROA de Brito FM Sene, Ann Entomol Soc Am 2001 94 333 346 10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0333:SAEOTD]2.0.CO;2
35. A primer of ecological genetics. JK Conner DL Hartl, Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Mass USA 2004 138
36. Studies in quantitative genetics. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. FW Robertson, J Genet 1957 55 428 443
37. Dispersal in Dipterans: its costs and consequences. D Roff, J Anim Ecol 1977 46 443 456 10.2307/3822
38. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXVII. Thorax length is positively correlated with longevity in a natural population from Argentina. E Hasson JJ Fanara C Rodriguez J Vilardi OA Reig A Fontdevila, Genetica 1993 92 61 65 10.1007/BF00057508 8163157
39. Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts. JJ Fanara J Mensch G Folguera E Hasson, Evol Ecol 2004 18 203 214 10.1023/B:EVEC.0000035043.32600.9d
40. Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila. JJ Fanara G Folguera P Fernández Iriarte J Mensch E Hasson, J Evol Biol 2006 19 3 900 908 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01084.x 16674586
41. Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae. VP Carreira IM Soto E Hasson JJ Fanara, J Evol Biol 2006 9 4 1275 1282 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01078.x
42. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XlV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. M Santos A Ruiz A Barbadilla JE Quezada-Díaz E Hasson A Fontdevila, Heredity 1988 61 255 262
43. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. M Santos A Ruiz JE Quezada-Diaz A Barbadilla A Fontdevila, J Evol Biol 1992 5 403 422 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5030403.x
44. Courtship success and multivariate analysis of sexual selection on morphometric traits in Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). FM Norry JC Vilardi JJ Fanara E Hasson, Journal of Insect Behaviour 1995 8 219 229 10.1007/BF01988906
45. Remating, sperm transfer, and sperm displacement in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii Patterson & Wheeler (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Bundgaard JSF Barker, Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2000 71 20 145 164 10.1006/bijl.1999.0433
46. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. A Bertin DJ Fairbairn, J Evol Biol 2005 18 4 949 961 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00913.x 16033567
47. Genetic Analysis of a Morphological Shape Difference in the Male Genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. J Liu JM Mercer LF Stam GC Gibson ZB Zeng CC Laurie, Genetics 1996 142 1129 1145 8846893
48. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. S Jagadeeshan RS Singh, J Evol Biol 2006 19 4 1058 1070 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01099.x 16780507
49. Genomic coadaptation, outbreeding depression, and developmental stability. P Alibert JC Auffray, Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences Oxford University Press, Oxford, Polak M, 2003 116 134
50. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. J Hey RM Kliman, Mol Biol Evol 1993 10 804 822 8355601
51. Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. F Lemeunier M Ashburner, Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1976 193 275 294 6967
52. The role of the use of different host plants in the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii. P Fernández Iriarte E Hasson, Evolution 2000 54 1295 1302 11005296
53. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. MAF Noor KL Grams LA Bertucci J Reiland, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 12084 12088 11593019 10.1073/pnas.221274498
54. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. LH Rieseberg, Trends Ecol Evol 2001 16 351 358 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5 11403867
55. TpsDig, v 1.31 Free software. FJ Rohlf, 2001 http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ morph/index.html Ecology & Evolution, SUNY, Stony Brook
56. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. FP Kuhl CR Giardina, Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1982 18 236 258 10.1016/0146-664X(82) 90034-X
57. SHAPE: A Computer Program Package for Quantitative Evaluation of Biological Shapes Based on Elliptic Fourier Descriptors. H Iwata Y Ukai, J Hered 2002 93 384 385 10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 12547931
58. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. S Ferson FJ Rohlf RK Koehn, Syst Zool 1985 34 59 68 10.2307/2413345
59. Fitting curves to outlines. FJ Rohlf, Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop, Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, 1990 167 177
60. Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology. PE Lestrel, Cambridge University Press. UK 1997 480
61. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). FJ Rohlf JW Archie, Systematic Biology 1984 33 302 317
62. Use of elliptic Fourier descriptors for quantification of male genitalia morphology. I Soto, Drosoph Inf Serv 2005 88 42 45
63. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. 2001 http://www.statsoft.com