START comprehending: Students and teachers actively reading text

Reading Teacher

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 20-31

  Scharlach, Tabatha Dobson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53849103620     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.62.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Almasi, J. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guilford.
2. Block, C.C., Gambrell, L.B., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4. Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481-538. doi:10.1598/RRQ.14.4.2
5. Gambrell, L.B., Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Improving comprehension instruction: An urgent priority. In C.C. Block, L.B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice (pp. 3-16). Newark, DE: International Reading Association; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Guthrie, J.T. (2002). Preparing students for high-stakes test taking in reading. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 370-391). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403-423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
8. Hilden, K.R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 51-75. doi:10.1080/10573560600837651
9. Keene, E.O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Klein, S.P., Hamilton, L.S., McCaffrey, D.F., & Stecher, B.M. (2000, October 26). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49). Retrieved June 12, 2008, from epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n49/
11. Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3-22. doi:10.1086/461914
12. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D., Jr. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
13. Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
14. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Pearson, P.D., Roehler, L.R., Dole, J.A., & Duffy, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed, 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Pressley, M. (2002a). Comprehension strategies instruction: A tum-of-the-century status report. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices (pp. 11-27). New York: Guilford.
17. Pressley, M. (2002b). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed, pp. 291-309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18. Pressley, M. (2002c). Improving comprehension instruction: A path for the future. In C.C. Block, L.B. Gambrell & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice (pp. 385-399). Newark, DE: International Reading Association; San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Pressley, M. (2006, April 29). What the future of reading research could be. Paper presented at the International Reading Association Reading Research Conference, Chicago, IL.
20. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 486-488, 512.
22. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159-194. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_4
23. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
24. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Morgan, C. (2003). The boy who spoke dog. New York: Penguin.