Manipulability of future-independent tests

Econometrica

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1437-1466

  Olszewski, Wojciech ^a   Sandroni, Alvaro ^b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Manipulability; Strategic experts; Testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 53749091964     PISSN: 00129682     EISSN: 14680262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3982/ECTA7428     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Al-Najjar, N., and J. Weinstein (2007 Comparative Testing of Experts Mimeo.
2. Cesa-Bianchi, N., and G. Lugosi (2006 Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge University Press.
3. Dekel, E., and Y. Feinberg (2006 Non-Bayesian Testing of a Stochastic Prediction Review of Economic Studies, 73, 893 906.
4. Dow, J., and G. Gorton (1997 Noise Trading, Delegated Portfolio Management, and Economics Welfare Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1024 1050.
5. Dudley, R. M. (1989 Real Analysis and Probability, Belmont, CA : Wadsworth.
6. Ellsberg, D. (1961 Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643 669.
7. Fan, K. (1953 Minimax Theorems Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A., 39, 42 47.
8. Feinberg, Y., and C. Stewart (2007 Testing Multiple Forecasters Mimeo.
9. Fortnow, L., and R. Vohra (2007 The Complexity of Forecast Testing Mimeo.
10. Foster, D., and R. Vohra (1998 Asymptotic Calibration Biometrika, 85, 379 390.
11. Fudenberg, D., and D. Levine (1999 An Easier Way to Calibrate Games and Economic Behavior, 29, 131 137.
12. Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler (1989 Maxmin Expected Utility With Non-Unique Prior Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141 153.
13. Keane, M., and D. Runkle (1990 Testing the Rationality of Price Forecasts: New Evidence From Panel Data American Economic Review, 80, 714 735.
14. Keane, M., and D. Runkle (1998 Are Financial Analysts' Forecasts of Corporate Profits Rational? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 768 805.
15. Knight, F. (1921 Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
16. Laster, D., P. Bennett, and I. Geoum (1999 Rational Bias in Macroeconomic Forecasts Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 293 318.
17. Lehrer, E. (2001 Any Inspection Rule Is Manipulable Econometrica, 69, 1333 1347.
18. Lehrer, E., and R. Smorodinsky (1996 Compatible Measures and Merging Mathematics of Operations Research, 21, 697 706.
19. LeRoy, S., and L. Singell (1987 Knight on Risk and Uncertainty Journal of Political Economy, 95, 394 406.
20. Lowell, M. (1986 Tests of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis American Economic Review, 76, 110 154.
21. Morgan, J., and P. Stocken (2003 An Analysis of Stock Recommendations RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 380 391.
22. Olszewski, W., and A. Sandroni (2007 a Contracts and Uncertainty Theoretical Economics, 2, 1 13.
23. Olszewski, W., and A. Sandroni (2007 b A Nonmanipulable Test The Annals of Statistics (forthcoming).
24. Olszewski, W., and A. Sandroni (2007 c Falsifiability Mimeo.
25. Olszewski, W., and A. Sandroni (2007 d Strategic Manipulation of Empirical Tests Mimeo.
26. Ottaviani, M., and P. Sørensen (2006 The Strategy of Professional Forecasting Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 441 466.
27. Pigou, A. (1927 Industrial Fluctuations, London : McMillan.
28. Rudin, W. (1973 Functional Analysis, New York : McGraw-Hill.
29. Sandroni, A. (2003 The Reproducible Properties of Correct Forecasts International Journal of Game Theory, 32, 151 159.
30. Sandroni, A., R. Smorodinsky, and R. Vohra (2003 Calibration With Many Checking Rules Mathematics of Operations Research, 28, 141 153.
31. Shiryaev, A. (1996 Probability, New York : Springer Verlag.
32. Shmaya, E. (2008 Many Inspections Are Manipulable Mimeo.
33. Smorodinsky, M. (1971 Ergodic Theory, Entropy, Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York : Springer Verlag.
34. Trueman, B. (1988 A Theory of Noise Trading in Securities Markets Journal of Finance, 18, 83 95.
35. Vovk, V., and G. Shafer (2005 Good Randomized Sequential Probability Forecasting Is Always Possible Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 67, 747 763.