Asymptotic calibration

Biometrika

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 379-390

  Foster, Dean P ^a,b   Vohra, Rakesh V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037539108     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/85.2.379     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BLACKWELL, D. (1956). An analog of the minimax theorem for vector payoffs. Pac. J. Math. 6, 1-8.
2. BLATTENBERGER, G. & LAD, F. (1985). Separating the Brier score into calibration and refinement components: A graphical exposition. Am. Statistician 39, 26-32.
3. BRIER, G. W. (1950). Vérification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon. Weather Rev. 75, 1-3.
4. COVER, T. (1991). Universal portfolios. Math. Finan. 16, 876-98.
5. DAWID, A. P. (1982). The well calibrated Bayesian. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 77, 605-13.
6. DAWID, A. P. (1984). Statistical theory, the prequential approach. J. R. Statist. Soc. A 147, 278-92.
7. DAWID, A. P. (1985). The impossibility of inductive inference. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 80, 340-1.
8. DAWID A P M 993) Prequential data analysis. In Current Issues in Statistical Inference: Essays in Honor of D. Basu',Ed.M. Ghosh and P. Palhak, IMS Lecture Notes Monograph Series, 17, pp. 113-26. Hayward, CA: Inst Math. Statist.
9. FEDER M MEHRAV, N. & GUTMAN, M. (1992). Universal prediction of individual sequences. IEEE Trans. Info' Theory 38, 1258-70.
10. FOSTER, D. P. (1991). A worst case analysis of prediction. Ann. Statist. 21, 625-44.
11. FOSTER, D. P. & VOHRA, R. (1993). A randomization rule for selecting forecasts. Oper. Res. 41, 704-9.
12. FREUND, Y. & SCHAPIRE, R. (1995). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 23-37. Springer-Verlag.
13. HANAN, J. (1957). Approximation to Bayes risk in repeated plays. In Contributions to the Theory of Games of Games, Ed. M. Dresher, A. \V. Tucker and P. Wolfe, 3, pp. 97-139. Princeton University Press.
14. LITTLESTONE, N. & WARMUTH, M. (1994). The weighted majority algorithm. Info. Comp. 108, 212-61.
15. MURPHY, A. H. (1972). Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score. Part I: Two-state situation. J. Appl. Meteor. 11, 273-8.
16. MURPHY, A. H. (1973). A new vector partition of the probability score. J. Appl. Meteor. 12, 595-600.
17. MURPHY, A. H. & EPSTEIN, E. (1967). Verification of probabilistic predictions: A brief review. J. Appl. Meteor. 6, 748-55.
18. OAKES, D. (1985). Self-calibrating priors do not exist. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 80, 339.
19. SCHERVISH, M. (1985). Comment on paper by Oakes. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 80, 341-2.
20. VOVK, V. (1990). Aggregating strategies. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 71-83. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.