Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304L during hot torsion

Applied Soft Computing Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 237-244

  Mandal, Sumantra ^a   Sivaprasad, P V ^a   Venugopal, S ^a   Murthy, K P N ^b  

^a INDIRA GANDHI CENTRE FOR ATOMIC RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Austenitic stainless steel; Back propagation; Deformation behavior; Hot torsion; Resilient propagation; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; DEFORMATION; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; INERT GAS WELDING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SENSOR NETWORKS; STEEL; STEEL CORROSION; STEEL METALLURGY; STRAIN RATE; TORSION TESTING; TORSIONAL STRESS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL; DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR; HOT TORSION; RESILIENT PROPAGATION; SENSITIVITY;

STAINLESS STEEL;

EID: 53749085067     PISSN: 15684946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Timothy S.P. The structure of adiabatic shear bands in metals: a critical review. Acta Metall. 35 (1987) 301-306
2. Zerilli F.J., and Armstrong R.M. Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for materials dynamic calculations. J. Appl. Phys. 61 (1987) 1816-1825
3. Follansbee P.S., and Kocks U.F. A constitutive description of the deformation of copper based on the use of the mechanical threshold stress as an internal state variable. Acta Metall. 36 (1988) 81-93
4. Rao K.P., and Hawbolt E.B. Assessment of simple flow stress relationships using literature data for a range of steels. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 29 (1992) 15-40
5. Baragar D.L. The high temperature and high strain rate behavior of a plain carbon and HSLA steel. J. Mech. Working Technol. 14 (1987) 295-307
6. Davenport S.B., Silk N.J., Sparks C.N., and Sellars C.M. Development of constitutive equations for modelling of hot rolling. Mater. Sci. Technol. 16 (2000) 539-546
7. Rao K.P., and Hawbolt E.B. Development of constitutive relationships using compression testing of a medium carbon steel. Trans. ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 114 (1992) 116-123
8. Chuan M.S., Biglou J., Lenard J.G., and Kim J.G. Using neural networks to predict parameters in the hot working of aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86 (1999) 245-251
9. Rao S., and Mandal S. Hindcasting of storm waves using neural networks. Ocean Eng. 32 (2005) 667-684
10. Rao K.P., and Prasad Y.K.D.V. Neural network approach to flow stress evaluation in hot deformation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 53 (1995) 552-566
11. Liu J., Chang H., Hsu T.Y., and Ruan X.J. Prediction of the flow stress of high-speed steel during hot deformation using a BP artificial neural network. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 103 (2000) 200-205
12. Mandal S., Sivaprasad P.V., and Venugopal S. Capability of a feed-forward artificial neural network to predict the constitutive flow behavior of as cast 304 stainless steel under hot deformation. Trans. ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 129 (2007) 242-247
13. Mandal S., Sivaprasad P.V., Venugopal S., and Murthy K.P.N. Constitutive flow behavior of austenitic stainless steels under hot deformation: artificial neural network modeling to understand, evaluate and predict. Model. Simulation Mater. Sci. Eng. 14 (2006) 1053-1070
14. Hardwick D., and Tegart W.J.McG. Structural changes during the hot deformation of Copper, Aluminium and Nickel at high temperature and high strain rates. J. Inst. Metals 90 (1961) 17
15. Luton M.J., and Sellers C.M. Acta Metall. 17 (1969) 1033
16. Hodgson P.D., Kong L.X., and Davies C.H.J. The prediction of the hot strength of steels with an integrated phenomenological and artificial neural network. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 87 (1999) 131-138
17. Semiatin S.L., and Lahoti G.D. Deformation and unstable flow in hot torsion of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si. Metall. Trans. A 12A (1981) 1719-1728
18. Juang S.C., Tarang Y.S., and Lii H.R. A comparison between the back-propagation and counter-propagation networks in the modeling of the TIG welding process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 75 (1998) 54-62
19. Anastasiadisa A.D., Magoulasa G.D., and Vrahatis M.N. New globally convergent training scheme based on the resilient propagation algorithm. Neurocomputing 64 (2005) 253-270
20. Reidimiller M., and Braun H. A direct adaptive method for faster back propagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Networks. San Francisco, CA (1993) 586-591
21. Hornik K., Stinchcombe M., and White H. Neural Netw. 2 5 (1989) 359-366
22. Phaniraj M.P., and Lahiri A.K. The applicability of neural network model to predict flow stress for carbon steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 141 (2003) 219-227
23. Srinivasulu S., and Jain A. A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Appl. Soft Comput. 6 (2006) 295-306
24. Semiatin S.L., and Jonas J.J. Formability and Workability of Metals (1984), ASM, Metals Park, Ohio p. 13
25. S.Venugoapl, PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Madras, 1993.
26. Olden J.D., Joy M.K., and Death R.G. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol. Model. 178 (2004) 389-397
27. Garson G.D. Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artif. Intell. Expert 6 (1991) 47-51
28. Mannan S.L., Samuel K.G., and Rodriguez P. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 68 (1984-1985) 143
29. Varin R.A. The effect of temperature and strain rate on the plastic flow and ductility of ultra-fined grained type 316 stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 94 (1987) 93-107