The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes

Health Expectations

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 109-115

  Entwistle, Vikki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision support; Screening; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING;

EID: 0034996202     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00141.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kassirer JP. Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 1994; 330: 1895-1896.
2. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Contentious screening decisions: does the choice matter? New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336: 1243-1244.
3. Barry MJ, Gherkin DC, Chang YC, Fowler FJ, Skates S. A randomized trial of a multimedia shared decision-making program for men facing a treatment decision for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Disease Management and Clinical Outcomes, 1997; 1: 5-14.
4. Deber R, Kraetschmer N, Trachtenberg J. Shared decision-making: how does one measure success? (Abstract) Medical Decision-making, 1994; 14: 429.
5. Street RLJ, Voigt B, Geyer CJ, Manning T, Swanson GP. Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer, 1995; 76: 2275-2285.
6. Sawka CA, Goel V, Mahut ÇA et al. Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Health Expectations, 1998; 1: 23-36.
7. Owens RG, Ashcroft JJ, Leinster SJ, Slade PD. Informal decision analysis with breast cancer patients: an aid to psychological preparation for surgery. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1987; 5: 23-33.
8. Chapman GB, Elstein AS, Hughes KK. Effects of patient education on decisions about breast cancer treatments: a preliminary report. Medical Decision-making, 1995; 15: 231-239.
9. Flood AB, Wennberg JE, Nease RFJ, Fowler FJJ, Ding J, Hynes LM. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1996; 11: 342-349.
10. Davison BJ, Kirk P, Degner LF, Hassard TH. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Education and Counselling, 1999; 37: 255-263.
11. Wolf AM, Nasser JF, Schorling JB. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate specific antigen screening. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1996; 156: 1333-1336.
12. Michie S, Smith D, McClennan A, Marteau TM. Patient decision-making: an evaluation of two different methods of presenting information about a screening test. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1997; 2: 317-326.
13. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL et al. Controlled trial of pre-test education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997; 89: 148-157.
14. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V el al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 731-734.
15. O'Connor AM, Fiset V, DeGrasse C et al. Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 1999; 25: 67-80.
16. Asch DA, Hershey JC. Why some health policies don't make sense at the bedside. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995; 122: 846-850.
17. Woolf SH, Di Guiseppi CG, Atkins D, Kamerow DB. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annual Review of Public Health, 1996; 17: 511-538.
18. Irwig L, Glasziou P. Implementing honesty about screening using community informed consent (letter). British Medical Journal, 2000; 321: 450.
19. Hiller EH, Landenburger G, Natowicz MR. Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 1997; 87: 1280-1288.
20. Entwistle V. Developing research-based information: creativity or compromise? Health Expectations, 2000; 3: 87-89.
21. Austoker J. Gaining informed consent for screening is difficult but many misconceptions need to be undone. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 722-723.
22. Smith DK, Shaw RW, Marteau TM. Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down syndrome: the gap between policy and practice. British MedicalJournal, 1994; 309: 776.
23. Al-Jader LN, Parry Langdon N, Smith RJ. Survey of attitudes of pregnant women towards Down syndrome screening. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2000; 20: 23-29.
24. Petticrew MP, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D, Wright K. False-negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications. Health Technology Assessment, 2000; 4.
25. Cockburn J, Staples M, Hurley S, de Juise T. Psychological costs of screening mamography. Journal of Medical Screening, 1994; 1: 7-12.
26. Parker M. The ethics of evidence-based patient choice. Health Expectations, 2001; 4: 87-91.
27. Molenaar S, Sprangers MAG, Postma-Schuit FCE et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Medical Decision-making, 2000; 20: 112-127.
28. Oliver S, Rajan L, Turner H et al. Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives and ultrasonographers. British Afedical Journal, 1996; 313: 1251-1255.
29. Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Nabozny-Valerio B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expectations, 2000; 3: 182-191.
30. Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Davis H, Dickson R, Pickard D, Rosser J. Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers: the experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health-care, 1998; 14: 47-70.
31. Stewart-Brown S, Farmer A. Screening could seriously damage your health. British Medical Journal, 1997; 314: 533.
32. Entwistle V, Sowden A, Watt I. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decisionmaking: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1998; 3: 100-107.