Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1377-1383

  Pearce, Alexandra I ^a   Pearce, Simon G ^a   Schwieger, Karsten ^a   Milz, Stefan ^a   Schneider, Erich ^a   Archer, Charles W ^b   Richards, R Geoff ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Implant removal; Stainless steel; Surface; Titanium; Titanium alloy

Indexed keywords

STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CANCELLOUS BONE; CORTICAL BONE; DEVICE REMOVAL; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; FRACTURE FIXATION; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; TORQUE;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; OSTEOTOMY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RIBS; SHEEP; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 53549128389     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20665     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Peterson HA. 2005. Metallic implant removal in children. J Pediatr Orthop 25:107-115.
2. Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. 2006. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:113-120.
3. Schmalzried TP, Grogan TJ, Neumeier PA, et al. 1991. Metal removal in a pediatric population: benign procedure or necessary evil? J Pediatr Orthop 11:72-76.
4. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. 2000. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2:120-128.
5. Piattelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, et al. 1998. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:805-810.
6. Soderholm AL, Rahn BA, Skutnabb K, et al. 1996. Fixation with reconstruction plates under critical conditions: the role of screw characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:469-473.
7. Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohya K. 1997. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone 21:507-514.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, et al. 1995. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 6:24-30.
9. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, et al. 1996. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17:15-22.
10. Ronold HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE. 2003. Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test. Biomaterials 24:4559-4564.
11. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. 1996. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:38-45.
12. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA. 1986. An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces. Biomaterials 7:201-205.
13. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, et al. 1988. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:21-24.
14. Millar BG, Frame JW, Browne RM. 1990. A histological study of stainless steel and titanium screws in bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:92-95.
15. Sun C, Huang G, Christensen FB, et al. 1999. Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel. Chin Med J (Engl) 112:456-460.
16. Chavassieux P, Pastoureau P, Boivin G, Charhon S, Chapuy M, Delmas P, Meunier P. 1987. Effects of sodium fluoride on bone remodeling in ewes. J Bone Miner Res 2 Suppl 1: abstract.
17. den Boer FC, Patka P, Bakker FC, et al. 1999. New segmental long bone defect model in sheep: quantitative analysis of healing with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res 17:654-660.
18. Pastoureau P, Arlot M, Caulin F, Barlet J, Meunier P, Delmas P. 1989. Effects of oophorectomy on biochemical and histological indices of bone turnover in ewes. J Bone Miner Res 4: S237, abstract 477.
19. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, et al. 2007. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 13:1-10.
20. Polig E, Jee WS. 1989. Bone structural parameters, dosimetry, and relative radiation risk in the beagle skeleton. Radiat Res 120:83-101.
21. Wennerberg A. 1999. The role of surface roughness for implant incorporation in bone. Cells Mater 9:1-19.
22. Eulenberger J, Steinemann SG. 1990. Removal torques of small screws of steel and titanium with different surfaces. Unfallchirurg 93:96-99.
23. Millar BG, Frame JW, Browne RM. 1990. A histological study of stainless steel and titanium screws in bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:92-95.
24. Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, et al. 2001. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. In: Brunette D, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Meredith DO, Eschbach L, Wood MA, et al. 2005. Human fibroblast reactions to standard and electropolished titanium and Ti-6Al-7Nb, and electropolished stainless steel. J Biomed Mater Res A 75:541-555.
26. Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis ASG, et al. 2007. Is surface chemical composition important for orthopaedic implant materials? J Mater Sci Mater Med 18:405-413.
27. Meredith DO, Eschbach L, Riehle MO, et al. 2007. Micro-topography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton and adhesion. J Orthop Res 25:1523-1533.
28. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. 1995. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 29:389-401.
29. Schmidt C, Ignatius AA, Claes LE. 2001. Proliferation and differentiation parameters of human osteoblasts on titanium and steel surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 54:209-215.
30. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, et al. 2003. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials 24:701-710.
31. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, et al. 2003. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:349-356.