The biology of organ size determination

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2008, Pages 16-22

  Stanger, Ben Z ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth; Regulation; Size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIOLOGIST; CONFERENCE PAPER; EMBRYO; GROWTH REGULATION; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; ORGAN SIZE; PARENCHYMA; REGENERATION;

EID: 53549123256     PISSN: 14628902     EISSN: 14631326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00938.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Efstratiadis A. Genetics of mouse growth. Int J Dev Biol 1998; 42: 955-976.
2. Nijhout HF. The control of growth. Development 2003; 130: 5863-5867.
3. Sutter NB, Bustamante CD, Chase K et al. A single IGF1 allele is a major determinant of small size in dogs. Science 2007; 316: 112-115.
4. Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ. Liver regeneration. Hepatology 2006; 43: S45-S53.
5. Bucher NL, Scott JF, Aub JC. Regeneration of the liver in parabiotic rats. Cancer Res 1951; 11: 457-465.
6. Moolten FL, Bucher NL. Regeneration of rat liver: Transfer of humoral agent by cross circulation. Science 1967; 158: 272-274.
7. Fisher B, Szuch P, Levine M, Fisher ER. A portal blood factor as the humoral agent in liver regeneration. Science 1971; 171: 575-577.
8. Bullough WS. Mitotic and functional homeostasis: A speculative review. Cancer Res 1965; 25: 1683-1727.
9. McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee SJ. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 1997; 387: 83-90.
10. McPherron AC, Lee SJ. Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 12457-12461.
11. Harrison RG. Some unexpected results of the heteroplastic transplantation of limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1924; 10: 69-74.
12. Twitty VC, Schwind JL. The growth of eyes and limbs transplanted heteroplastically between two species of amblystoma. J Exp Zool 1931; 59: 61-86.
13. Day SJ, Lawrence PA. Measuring dimensions: The regulation of size and shape. Development 2000; 127: 2977-2987.
14. de la Cova C, Abril M, Bellosta P, Gallant P, Johnston LA. Drosophila myc regulates organ size by inducing cell competition. Cell 2004; 117: 107-116.
15. Moreno E, Basler K. dMyc transforms cells into super-competitors. Cell 2004; 117: 117-129.
16. Simpson P, Morata G. Differential mitotic rates and patterns of growth in compartments in the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol 1981; 85: 299-308.
17. Neufeld TP, de la Cruz AF, Johnston LA, Edgar BA. Coordination of growth and cell division in the Drosophila wing. Cell 1998; 93: 1183-1193
18. Santamaria P. Analysis of haploid mosaics in Drosophila. Dev Biol 1983; 96: 285-295.
19. Oliver ER, Saunders TL, Tarle SA, Glaser T. Ribosomal protein L24 defect in belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse minute. Development 2004; 131: 3907-3920.
20. Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 2007; 130: 1120-1133.
21. Lazzerini Denchi E, Celli G, de Lange T. Hepatocytes with extensive telomere deprotection and fusion remain viable and regenerate liver mass through endoreduplication. Genes Dev 2006; 20: 2648-2653.
22. Driesch H. The potency of the first two cleavage cells in Echinoderm development. Experimental production of partial and double formations. In: Willier B, Oppenheimer J, eds. Foundations of experimental embryology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1892; 38-50.
23. Harty M, Neff AW, King MW, Mescher AL. Regeneration or scarring: An immunologic perspective. Dev Dyn 2003; 226: 268-279.
24. Wolpert L, Beddington R, Brockes J, Jessell T, Lawrence P, Meyerowitz E. Principles of Development. London: Current Biology, 1998.
25. Summerbell D, Lewis JH. Time, place and positional value in the chick limb-bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1975; 33: 621-643.
26. Wolpert L. Cellular basis of skeletal growth during development. Br Med Bull 1981; 37: 215-219.
27. Stanger BZ, Tanaka AJ, Melton DA. Organ size is limited by the number of embryonic progenitor cells in the pancreas but not the liver. Nature 2007; 445: 886-891.
28. Bouwens L, Rooman I. Regulation of pancreatic beta-cell mass. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 1255-1270.
29. Jensen JN, Cameron E, Garay MV, Starkey TW, Gianani R, Jensen J. Recapitulation of elements of embryonic development in adult mouse pancreatic regeneration. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 728-741.
30. Lee CS, De Leon DD, Kaestner KH, Stoffers DA. Regeneration of pancreatic islets after partial pancreatectomy in mice does not involve the reactivation of neurogenin-3. Diabetes 2006; 55: 269-272.
31. Nir T, Melton DA, Dor Y. Recovery from diabetes in mice by beta cell regeneration. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 2553-2561.
32. Teta M, Rankin MM, Long SY, Stein GM, Kushner JA. Growth and regeneration of adult beta cells does not involve specialized progenitors. Dev Cell 2007; 12: 817-826.
33. Muller-Sieburg CE, Cho RH, Sieburg HB, Kupriyanov S, Riblet R. Genetic control of hematopoietic stem cell frequency in mice is mostly cell autonomous. Blood 2000; 95: 2446-2448.
34. Menard D. Growth-promoting factors and the development of the human gut. In: Lebenthal E, ed. Human Gastrointestinal Development. New York: Raven Press, 1989; 123-150.
35. Weale AR, Edwards AG, Bailey M, Lear PA. Intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 178-184.
36. Heiser PW, Lau J, Taketo MM, Herrera PL, Hebrok M. Stabilization of beta-catenin impacts pancreas growth. Development 2006; 133: 2023-2032.
37. Bhushan A, Itoh N, Kato S et al. Fgf10 is essential for maintaining the proliferative capacity of epithelial progenitor cells during early pancreatic organogenesis. Development 2001; 128: 5109-5117.
38. Hart A, Papadopoulou S, Edlund H. Fgf10 maintains notch activation, stimulates proliferation, and blocks differentiation of pancreatic epithelial cells. Dev Dyn 2003; 228: 185-193.
39. Murtaugh LC, Stanger BZ, Kwan KM, Melton DA. Notch signaling controls multiple steps of pancreatic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 14920-14925.
40. Norgaard GA, Jensen JN, Jensen J. FGF10 signaling maintains the pancreatic progenitor cell state revealing a novel role of Notch in organ development. Dev Biol 2003; 264: 323-338.
41. Stanger BZ, Datar R, Murtaugh LC, Melton DA. Direct regulation of intestinal fate by Notch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 12443-12448.
42. Carlson BM. Some principles of regeneration in mammalian systems. Anat Rec B 2005; 287: 4-13.
43. Sato M, Suzuki S, Senoo H. Hepatic stellate cells: Unique characteristics in cell biology and phenotype. Cell Struct Funct 2003; 28: 105-112.
44. Xu X, D'Hoker J, Stange G et al. Beta cells can be generated from endogenous progenitors in injured adult mouse pancreas. Cell 2008; 132: 197-207.