Assessing precision of change scores in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A generalizability theory approach

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 162-178

  Hagtvet, Knut A ^a,b   Hgølend, Per A ^b  

^a Department of Psychology ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53549083505     PISSN: 07481756     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2008.11909828     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persistent dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in the measurement of change (pp. 3-20). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
3. Brennan, R. L. (2001a). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.
4. Brennan, R. L. (2001b). Some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 6-18.
5. Brennan, R. L., & Kane, M. T. (1977a). An index of dependability for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 277-289.
6. Brennan, R. L., & Kane, M. T. (1977b). Signal/noise ratios for domain-referenced tests. Psychometrika, 42, 609-625.
7. B*øgwald, K.-R, & Dahlbender, R. W. (2004). Procedures for testing some aspects of the content validity of the Psychodynamic Functioning Scales and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 453-468.
8. Collins, L., & Horn, J. (1991). Best methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Crick, J. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1983). Manual for GENOVA: A generalizability analysis of variance system (American College Testing Technical Bulletin No. 43). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
12. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure "change"-Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 68-80.
13. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
14. DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D. E., Rosenberg, S. E., Zilberg, N. J., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1991). Scales of psychological capacities: Development of an assessment approach. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14, 343-361.
15. Dunn, G. (1992). Design and analysis of reliability studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1, 123-157.
16. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-772.
17. Hagtvet, K. A., & Zuo, L. (2000). Conceptual and empirical components of an internal domain study: An illustration in terms of the Achievement Motives Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 49-78.
18. Hersoug, A. G. (2004). Assessment of therapists' and patients' personality: Relationship to therapeutic technique and outcome. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 191-200.
19. Høglend, P. (2004). Analysis of transference in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A review of empirical research. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12, 279-300.
20. Høglend, P., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Bøgwald, K.-P., Sørbye, Ø., Sjaastad, M. C., & Heyerdahl, O. (2006). Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: An experimental study of transference interpretations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1739-1746.
21. Høglend, P. A., Bøgwald, K.-P., Amlo, S., Heyerdahl, O., Sørbye, Ø., Marble, A., et al. (2000). Assessment of change in dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy: Practice and Research, 9, 190-199.
22. Horowitz, M. J., Mannar, C. J., Weiss, D. S., Kaltreider, N. B., & Wilner, N. R. (1986). Comprehensive analysis of change after brief dynamic psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 582-589.
23. Kaltreider, N. B., DeWitt, K. N., Weiss, D. S., & Horowitz, M. J. (1981). Patterns of individual change scales. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 1236-1269.
24. Kane, M. T. (1996). The precision of measurements. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 355-379.
25. Kernberg, O. F., Coyne, L., Horowitz, L., Appelbaum, A., & Burstein, E. D. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: Final report of the Menninger Foundation's Psychotherapy Research Project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 36, 1-275.
26. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
27. Lord, F. M. (1956). The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 421-437.
28. Lord, F. M. (1958). Further problems in the measurement of change. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 437-454.
29. Lund, T. (2001). Måling av forandring-En innføring [Measuring change-An introduction]. Oslo, Norway: Unipub Forlag.
30. McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal analysis. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. McGlashan, T. H., & Miller, G. H. (1982). The goals of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 377-388.
33. McNemar, Q. (1958). On growth measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 47-55.
34. Meredith, W, & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
35. Miller, T. B., & Kane, M. (2001). The precision of change scores under absolute and relative interpretations. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 307-327.
36. Muthen, B. O., & Curran, P. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371-402.
37. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (Eds.). (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Rogosa, D. (1995). Myths and methods: "Myths about longitudinal research" plus supplemental questions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 3-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.
40. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
41. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
42. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. London: Sage.
43. Weinryb, R. M., Rassel, R. J., & Asberg, M. (1991). The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile, II: Interdisciplinary and cross-cultural reliability. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83, 73-76.
44. Wilczek, A., Barber, J. P., Gustavsson, J. P., Åsberg, M., & Weinryb, R. M. (2004). Change after longterm psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association, 52, 1163-1184.
45. Willett, J. B., & Keiley, M. K. (2000). Using covariance structure analysis to model change over time. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 665-694). New York: Academic Press.
46. Yin, P., & Brennan, R. L. (2002). An investigation of difference scores for a grade-level testing program. lnternational Journal of Testing, 2, 83-105.
47. Zilberg, N. J., Wallerstein, R. S., DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D. E., & Rosenberg, S. (1991). A conceptual analysis and strategy for assessing structural change. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14, 317-342.