Procedures for testing some aspects of the content validity of the psychodynamic functioning scales and the global assessment of functioning scale

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 453-468

  Bøgwald, Kjell Petter ^a   Dahlbender, Reiner W ^b  

^a DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; GENDER; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; NORWAY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; RATING SCALE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 7744228814     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptr/kph038     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anastasi, A. (1968). Psychological testing (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
3. Bimler, D. L., & Kirkland, J. (1998). Perceptual modeling of product similarities using sorting data. Marketing Bulletin, 9, 16-27.
4. Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL.: Charles C Thomas.
5. Campbell, S. M., Hann, M., Roland, M. O., Quayle, J. A., & Shekelle, P. G. (1999). The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Medical Care, 37, 964-968.
6. Coulter, I., Adams, A., & Shekelle, P. (1995). Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: A comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel. Health Service Research, 30, 577-591.
7. Crisp, J., Pelletier, D., Duffield, C., Nagy, S., & Adams, A. (1999). It's all in a name. When is a "Delphi study" not a Delphi study? Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 32-37.
8. DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D. E., Rosenberg, S. E., & Zilberg, N. J. (1991). Scales of psychological capacities: Development of an assessment approach. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14, 343-361.
9. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
10. Friis, S. (1986). Measurements of the perceived ward milieu: A reevaluation of the Ward Atmosphere Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 73, 589-599.
11. Goldman, H. H., Skodol, A. E., & Lave, T. R. (1992). Revising axis V for DSM-IV:, A review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1148-1156.
12. Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282.
13. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238-247.
14. Hoglend, P., Bøgwald, K. P., Amlo, S., Heyerdahl, O., Sorbye, O., Marble, A., et al. (2000). Assessment of change in dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9, 190-199.
15. Patterson, D.A., & Lee, M.S. (1995). Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale-Modified. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(9), 1386-1388.
16. Romney, A. K., Boyd, J., Moore, C. H., Batchelder, W., & Brazill, J. (1996). Culture as shared cognitive representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 4699-4705.
17. Schmolck, P. (2000). PQMethod [Computer software]. Department of Education, University of the Federal Armed Forces, Munich.
18. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
19. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (1997). [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.
20. Stephenson, W. (1935). Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality, 4, 17-24.
21. Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Wallerstein, R. S., DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D., Rosenberg, S. E., Weiss, D. S., & Zilberg, N, J. (1989). Scales of Psychological Capacities: Manual. Unpublished manuscript.
23. Weinryb, R. M. (1992). Construction and evaluation of a rating instrument for psychodynamic assessment, the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP)., Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institute.
24. Woundenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 40, 131-150.