-
3
-
-
0038017205
-
-
Levine L., Gaydos B., Sheehan D., Goddard A.W., Feighner J., Potter W.Z., and Schoepp D.D. Neuropharmacology 43 (2002) 294
-
(2002)
Neuropharmacology
, vol.43
, pp. 294
-
-
Levine, L.1
Gaydos, B.2
Sheehan, D.3
Goddard, A.W.4
Feighner, J.5
Potter, W.Z.6
Schoepp, D.D.7
-
4
-
-
0034717225
-
-
Spooren W.P.J.M., Gasparini F., van der Putten H., Koller M., Nakanichi S., and Kuhn R. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 397 (2000) R1
-
(2000)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
, vol.397
-
-
Spooren, W.P.J.M.1
Gasparini, F.2
van der Putten, H.3
Koller, M.4
Nakanichi, S.5
Kuhn, R.6
-
7
-
-
0032791811
-
-
Kingston A.E., O'Neill M.J., Lam A., Bales K.R., Monn J.A., and Schoepp D.D. Eur. J. Phamacol. 377 (1999) 155
-
(1999)
Eur. J. Phamacol.
, vol.377
, pp. 155
-
-
Kingston, A.E.1
O'Neill, M.J.2
Lam, A.3
Bales, K.R.4
Monn, J.A.5
Schoepp, D.D.6
-
8
-
-
23644440111
-
-
Jones C.K., Eberle E.L., Peters S.C., Monn J.A., and Shannon H.E. Neuropharmacology 49 (2005) 206
-
(2005)
Neuropharmacology
, vol.49
, pp. 206
-
-
Jones, C.K.1
Eberle, E.L.2
Peters, S.C.3
Monn, J.A.4
Shannon, H.E.5
-
9
-
-
34948858402
-
-
Patil S.T., Zhang L., Martenyi F., Lowe S.L., Jackson K.A., Andreev B.V., Avedisova A.S., Bardenstein L.M., Gurovich I.Y., Morozova M.A., Mosolov S.N., Neznanov N.G., Reznik A.M., Smulevich A.B., Tochilov V.A., Johnson B.G., Monn J.A., and Schoepp D.D. Nat. Med. 13 (2007) 1102
-
(2007)
Nat. Med.
, vol.13
, pp. 1102
-
-
Patil, S.T.1
Zhang, L.2
Martenyi, F.3
Lowe, S.L.4
Jackson, K.A.5
Andreev, B.V.6
Avedisova, A.S.7
Bardenstein, L.M.8
Gurovich, I.Y.9
Morozova, M.A.10
Mosolov, S.N.11
Neznanov, N.G.12
Reznik, A.M.13
Smulevich, A.B.14
Tochilov, V.A.15
Johnson, B.G.16
Monn, J.A.17
Schoepp, D.D.18
-
10
-
-
34249078595
-
-
For a recent review, see:
-
For a recent review, see:. Recasens M., Guiramand J., Aimar R., Abdulkarium A., and Barbanel G. Curr. Drug Targets 8 (2007) 651
-
(2007)
Curr. Drug Targets
, vol.8
, pp. 651
-
-
Recasens, M.1
Guiramand, J.2
Aimar, R.3
Abdulkarium, A.4
Barbanel, G.5
-
13
-
-
53349167074
-
-
20 glutamate challenge. Data is analyzed as a ratio of the peak fluorescence to the baseline after compound addition. Assay to assay variability in PAM potency required multiple experiments to determine potency, typically n > 3.
-
20 glutamate challenge. Data is analyzed as a ratio of the peak fluorescence to the baseline after compound addition. Assay to assay variability in PAM potency required multiple experiments to determine potency, typically n > 3.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
53349102865
-
-
Whole brain and blood samples were collected from Sprague-Dawley rats at various times following administration of a single 10 mg/kg subcutaneous dose. Plasma and brain homogenate samples were quantitated using an LC/MS method and the brain to plasma ratio reported.
-
Whole brain and blood samples were collected from Sprague-Dawley rats at various times following administration of a single 10 mg/kg subcutaneous dose. Plasma and brain homogenate samples were quantitated using an LC/MS method and the brain to plasma ratio reported.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
53349161881
-
-
Compound 1 (1 μM) was incubated in rat or human liver microsome and monitored for substrate depletion using an LC/MS method. Hepatic clearance was determined by scaling of the observed half-life using the well stirred model.
-
Compound 1 (1 μM) was incubated in rat or human liver microsome and monitored for substrate depletion using an LC/MS method. Hepatic clearance was determined by scaling of the observed half-life using the well stirred model.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
53349096368
-
-
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in rats following a 1 mg/kg intravenous or 5 mg/kg oral administration to male Sprague-Dawley rats. Whole blood was collected from a jugular (iv and oral) or portal vein (oral only) catheter and plasma samples analyzed using an LC/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis of the plasma concentration versus time data.
-
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in rats following a 1 mg/kg intravenous or 5 mg/kg oral administration to male Sprague-Dawley rats. Whole blood was collected from a jugular (iv and oral) or portal vein (oral only) catheter and plasma samples analyzed using an LC/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis of the plasma concentration versus time data.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
53349098593
-
-
In vitro rat microsomal stability r-CLh of 14c is 41 ml/min/kg, consistent with the in vivo measurement (within two folds).
-
In vitro rat microsomal stability r-CLh of 14c is 41 ml/min/kg, consistent with the in vivo measurement (within two folds).
-
-
-
|