Impacts of "three strikes and you're out" on crime trends in California and throughout the United States

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 345-370

  Chen, Elsa Y ^a  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Mandatory sentencing; Three Strikes

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349143034     PISSN: 10439862     EISSN: 15525406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1043986208319456     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ardaiz, J.A. (2000). California's Three Strikes law: History, expectations, consequences. McGeorge Law Review, 32 ( 1 ).
2. Auerhahn, K. (1999). Selective incapacitation and the problem of prediction. Criminology, 37 (4). 703-734.
3. Auerhahn, K. (2002). Selective incapacitation, three strikes, and the problem of aging prison populations: Using simulation modeling to see the future. Criminology and Public Policy, 1 (3). 353-388.
4. Auerhahn, K. (2003). Selective incapacitation and public policy: Evaluating California's imprisonment crisis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Austin, J. (1994). " Three Strikes and You're Out": The likely consequences on the courts, prisons, and crime in California and Washington State. St. Louis University Public Law Review, 14 (1). 239-268.
6. Austin, J., Clark, J., Hardyman, P., & Henry, D.A. (1999). The impact of "Three Strikes and You're Out." Punishment and Society, 1 (2). 131-162.
7. Austin, J., Jones, M.A., Naro, W., & Cohen, R.L. (1996). National survey of state sentencing structures. Washington, DC: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
8. Beres, L.S., & Griffith, T.D. (1998). Did Three Strikes cause the recent drop in California crime? An analysis of the California Attorney General's report. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 3, 101.
9. Blumstein, A., & Rosenfeld, R. (1998). Explaining recent trends in U.S. homicide rates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88 (4). 1175-1216.
10. Bowling, B. (1999). The rise and fall of New York murder: Zero tolerance or crack's decline ? British Journal of Criminology, 39 (4). 531-554.
11. Bratton, W.J. (1996, April 5). How to win the war against crime. New York Times, p. 27.
12. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2008). Second and third striker felons in the adult institution population, December 31, 2007. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Offender Information Services Branch, Estimates and Statistical Analysis Section, Data Analysis Unit.
13. California District Attorney's Association. (2004). Prosecutors' perspective on California's Three Strikes Law: A 10-year retrospective. Sacramento, CA: Author.
14. California Legislative Analyst's Office. (2008). The 2008-09 budget: Perspectives and issues: Report from the legislative analyst's office to the joint legislative budget committee. Sacramento, CA: Author.
15. California Youth and Adult Correctional Agency-Board of Corrections. (1996). "Three Strikes, You're Out": Impact on California's criminal justice system and options for ongoing monitoring, legislative report. Sacramento, CA: Board of Corrections.
16. Caulkins, J.P. (2001). How large should the strike zone be in Three Strikes and You're Out Sentencing Laws ? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17 (3). 227-246.
17. Chen, E. (in press). The liberation hypothesis and racial and ethnic disparities in the application of California's Three Strikes Law, 6(2), Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice.
18. Cherry, T. (1999). Unobserved heterogeneity bias when estimating the economic model of crime. Applied Economics Letters, 6 (11). 753-757.
19. Clark, J., Austin, J., & Henry, D.A. (1997). " Three Strikes and You're Out": A review of state legislation. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
20. Dickey, W.J. (1996). The impact of "Three Strikes and You're Out" laws: What have we learned? Washington, DC: Campaign for an Effective Crime Policy.
21. Dickey, W.J. (1998). " Three Strikes": Five years later. Washington, DC: Campaign for an Effective Crime Policy.
22. Ditton, P.M., & Wilson, D.J. (1999). Truth in sentencing in state prisons (No. NCJ 170032). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
23. Fagan, J., Zimring, F.E., & Kim, J. (1998). Declining homicide in New York: A tale of two trends. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1277-1324.
24. Furillo, A. (2004, November 4). Late infusion of cash sank Proposition 66. Sacramento Bee, p. 3.
25. Gatland, L. (1998). Three strikes a soft pitch: Most states send few to prison under Three Strikes Law. ABA Journal, 84, 29.
26. Gottfredson, S.D., & Gottfredson, D.M. (1994). Behavioral prediction and the problem of incapacitation. Criminology, 32 (3). 441-474.
27. Greenwood, P., & Abrahamse, A.F. (1982). Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
28. Greenwood, P., Rydell, C.P., Abrahamse, A.F., Caulkins, J.P., Chiesa, J., Model, K.E., et al. (1994). Three strikes and you're out: Estimated benefits and costs of California's new mandatory-sentencing law. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
29. Grogger, J. (2006). An economic model of recent trends in violence. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America (Rev. ed., pp. 266-288). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Guzman, B. (2001). The Hispanic population: Census 2000 brief. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
31. Johnson, B., Golub, A., & Dunlap, E. (2000). The rise and decline of hard drugs, drug markets, and violence in inner-city New York. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Johnson, D.R. (1995). Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled times-series models. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57 (4). 1065-1077.
33. Katz, C.M., Webb, V.J., & Schaefer, D.R. (2001). An assessment of the impact of quality-of-life policing on crime and disorder. Justice Quarterly, 18 (4). 825-876.
34. Kelling, G.L., & Bratton, W.J. (1988). Declining crime rates: Insiders' views of the New York City story. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88 (4). 1217-1232.
35. King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. King, R.S., & Mauer, M. (2001). Aging behind bars: "Three Strikes" seven years later. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
37. Kovandzic, T.V., Sloan, J.J., & Vieraitis, L.M. (2002). Unintended consequences of politically popular sentencing policy: The homicide promoting effects of "Three Strikes" in U.S. cities (1980-1999). Criminology and Public Policy, 1 (3). 399-424.
38. Kovandzic, T.V., Sloan, J.J., & Vieraitis, L.M. (2004). "Striking Out" as crime reduction policy: The impact of "Three Strikes" laws on crime rates in U.S. cities. Justice Quarterly, 21 (2). 207-239.
39. Legislative Analyst's Office. (2005). A primer: Three strikes. The impact after more than a decade. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst's Office.
40. Lott, J.R., Jr. (1998). More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Lott, J.R., Jr., & Mustard, D.B. (1997). Crime, deterrence, and right-to-carry concealed hand guns. Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 1-68.
42. Lundstrom, M. (2004, November 11). "Three strikes" battle continues after demise of Prop. 66. Sacramento Bee, p. 3.
43. Lungren, D. (1996). Three cheers for Three Strikes: California enjoys a record drop in crime. Policy Review, 80.
44. Lungren, D. (1997, February 24). Our tough law works. USA Today.
45. Males, M., Macallair, D., & Taqi-Eddin, K. (1999). Striking out: The failure of California's "Three Strikes and You're Out" law. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
46. Marvell, T.B., & Moody, C.E. (1996). Determinate sentencing and abolishing parole: The long-term impacts on prisons and crime. Criminology, 34 (1). 107-129.
47. Marvell, T.B., & Moody, C.E. (2001). The lethal effects of Three Strikes laws. Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (1). 89-106.
48. Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (Eds.). (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: New Press.
49. McDonald, J.F. (1999). An economic analysis of guns, crime, and gun control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27 (1). 11-19.
50. McMurry, K. (1997). " Three Strikes" laws proving more show than go. Trial, 33 (1). 12.
51. Moore, M.J. (Writer/Director). (1999). The legacy: Murder & media, politics & prisons [Motion picture]. United States: P. L. Productions.
52. National Conference of State Legislatures. (1996). "Three Strikes" legislation update. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.
53. Plassmann, F., & Tideman, T.N. (2001). Does the right to carry concealed handguns deter countable crimes? Only a count analysis can say. Journal of Law & Economics, 44, 771-798.
54. Ramirez, J.R., & Crano, W.D. (2003). Deterrence and incapacitation: An interrupted time-series analysis of California's Three Strikes Law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33 (1). 110-145.
55. Ramirez, R. (2004). We the people: Hispanics in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
56. Reynolds, M. (1995, July 6). Can't argue with success. USA Today.
57. Reynolds, M. (2005). 3-Strikes 1994-2004: A decade of difference. Sacramento: Department of Justice and California Department of Corrections.
58. Ricciardulli, A. (2002). The broken safety valve: Judicial discretion's failure to ameliorate punishment under California's Three Strikes Law. Duquesne Law Review, 41, 1-67.
59. Sabol, W., Rosich, K., Kane, K.M., Kirk, D.P., & Dubin, G. (2002). The influences of truth-in-sentencing reforms on changes in states' sentencing practices and prison populations. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
60. Sayrs, L.W. (1989). Pooled time series analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61. Schiraldi, V., Colburn, J., & Lotke, E. (2004). An examination of the impact of 10 years after their enactment. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
62. Schmertmann, C.P., Amankwaa, A.A., & Long, R.D. (1998). Three Strikes and You're Out: Demographic analysis of mandatory prison sentencing. Demography, 35 (4). 445-463.
63. Shepherd, J. (2002). Fear of the first strike: The full deterrent effect of California's two- and three-strikes legislation. Journal of Legal Studies, 31, 159-201.
64. Spelman, W. (2005). Jobs or jails? The crime drop in Texas. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24 (1). 133-165.
65. State of Washington Sentencing Guidelines Commission. (2006). Two strikes and three strikes: Persistent offender sentencing in Washington State through March 2006. Olympia: State of Washington Sentencing Guidelines Commission.
66. Stimson, J.A. (1985). Regressions in space and time: A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 914-947.
67. Stolzenberg, L., & D'Alessio, S.J. (1997). " Three Strikes and You're Out": The impact of California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates. Crime & Delinquency, 43 (4). 457-469.
68. Travis, J. (2002). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15-36). New York: New Press.
69. Travis, J., & Waul, M. (Eds.). (2003). Prisoners once removed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
70. Trumbull, W.N. (1989). Estimations of the economic model of crime using aggregate and individual level data. Southern Economic Journal, 56 (2). 423-439.
71. Turner, S., Fain, T., Greenwood, P.W., Chen, E., & Chiesa, J. (2001). National evaluation of the violent offender incarceration/truth-in-sentencing incentive grant program, 1996-1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
72. Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Chiesa, J. (2006). An evaluation of the federal government's violent offender incarceration and truth-in-sentencing incentive grants. The Prison Journal, 86 (3). 364-385.
73. United States Census Bureau. (2006). Table 3: Annual estimates of the population by sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino origin for California: April 1, 2000, to July 1, 2006 (SC-EST2006-03-06). Washington, DC: Author.
74. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Truth in sentencing: Availability of federal grants influenced laws in some states. Washington, DC: Author.
75. Wallman, J., & Blumstein, A. (2005). After the crime drop. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 319-348). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Walsh, J.E. (1999, September 2-5). "In the Furtherance of Justice": The effect of discretion in the implementation of California's Three Strikes Law. Paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
77. Walsh, J.E. (2004). Tough for whom? How prosecutors and judges use their discretion to promote justice under the California Three Strikes Law. Claremont, CA: The Henry Salvatori Center for the Study of Individual Freedom in the Modern World, Claremont McKenna College.
78. Walters, D. (2004, November 16). Voter turnaround on Proposition 66 was a dramatic campaign event. Sacramento Bee, p. 3.
79. Washington State Sentencing Guidelines Commission. (2006). Two strikes and three strikes: Persistent offender sentencing in Washington State through March 2006. Olympia, WA: Author.
80. Witkin, G. (1998, May 25). The crime bust. U.S. News and World Report.
81. Wolfgang, M.E., Figlio, R.M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Worrall, J.L. (2004). The effect of Three Strikes legislation on serious crime in California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32 (4). 283-296.
83. Worrall, J.L., & Pratt, T.C. (2004). On the consequences of ignoring unobserved heterogeneity when estimating macro-level models of crime. Social Science Research, 33 (1). 79-105.
84. Zimring, F.E., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
85. Zimring, F.E., Kamin, S., & Hawkins, G. (1999). Crime and punishment in California: The impact of Three Strikes and You're Out. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.