3-Tesla MRI vs. arthroscopy for diagnostics of degenerative knee cartilage diseases. Preliminary clinical results;3-Tesla-MRT vs. arthroskopie bei der diagnostik degenerativer knorpelschäden des kniegelenkes. Erste klinische ergebnisse

Orthopade

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 914-922

  Von Engelhardt, L V ^a   Schmitz, A ^b   Burian, B ^b   Pennekamp, P H ^b   Schild, H H ^b   Kraft, C N ^c   Von Falkenhausen, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^c HELIOS KLINIKUM KREFELD   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 Tesla MRI; Arthroscopy; Arthrosis; Cartilage; Knee

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROSCOPY; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 53249100387     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1313-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adam 1994 Rofo 160 143
2. Adams 1991 J Rheumatol 18 1573
3. Bachmann 1997 Rofo 166 429
4. Bachmann 1999 Eur Radiol 9 145
5. Blackburn 1994 J Rheumatol 21 675
6. Broderick 1994 Am J Roentgenol 1994 162 99
7. Craig 2005 Skeletal Radiol 34 453
8. Disler 1996 Am J Roentgenol 167 127
9. Drapé 1998 Radiology 208 49
10. Eckstein 2006 Ann Rheum Dis 65 433
11. Erickson 1996 Radiology 201 260
12. Frank 1997 Am J Roentgenol 168 547
13. Friemert 2004 Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12 58
14. Gold 2005 J Magn Reson Imag 21 476
15. Gold 2006 Radiology 240 546
16. Gross 2003 J Arthroplasty 18 14
17. Guckel 1995 Eur J Radiol 21 25
18. Hodler 1996 Skeletal Radiol 25 703
19. Hunziker 2002 Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10 432
20. Jerosch J, Castro WH, Waal Malefijt MC de et al. (1997) Interobserver variation in diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee joint. "How really objective are arthroscopic findings?" Unfallchirurg 100: 782-786
21. Kawahara 1998 Acta Radiol 39 120
22. Link 2006 Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14 63
23. Lühring 2004 Z Orthop 142 546
24. Mankin 1982 J Bone Joint Surg Am 64 460
25. Masi 2005 Radiology 236 140
26. Messner 1996 Acta Orthop Scand 67 165
27. Mitchell 2004 Clin Orthop 423 3
28. Murphy 2001 Skeletal Radiol 30 305
29. Potter 1998 J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1276
30. Rubenstein 1997 Am J Roentgenol 169 1089
31. Schmitt 2004 Radiologe 44 31
32. Schröder 2004 Rofo 176 1667
33. Shahriaree 1985 Contemp Orthop 11 27
34. Spahn G, Wittig R, Kahl E et al. (2008) Evaluation of cartilage defects in the knee: validity of clinical, magnetic-resonance-imaging and radiological findings compared with arthroscopy. Unfallchirurg (in press) (epub ahead of print)
35. von 2007 Arthroscopy 23 496
36. Weckbach 2006 Invest Radiol 41 189
37. Yoshioka 2004 Radiology 231 31
38. Yoshioka 2004 J Magn Reson Imag 20 857