Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness;Hornhautdickenunabhängige Methoden der Messung des Augeninnendrucks

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 105, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 840-844

  Hager, A ^a   Wiegand, W ^a  

^a Asklepios Klinik Nord Heidberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

Corneal hysteresis; Dynamic contour tonometry; Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; GLAUCOMA; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; METHODOLOGY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CORNEA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 52949108464     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-008-1729-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135-160
2. Domke N, Hager A, Wiegand W (2006) Augeninnendruck und Hornhautdicke. Ein Vergleich zwischen Non-Contact-Tonometrie und Applanations-tonometrie. Ophthalmologe 103:583-587
3. Draeger J, Jessen K, Haselmann G (1975) Klinische und experimentelle Untersuchungen mit dem Non-contact-Tonometer. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 167:27-34
4. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Über Applanations-tonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221-241
5. Gunvant R O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M et al. (2005) Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 14:337-343
6. Hager A, Dave H, Wiegand W (2005) Hornhautpachymetrie und Augeninnendruck. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:558-567
7. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B et al. (2007) Changes of corneal hysteresis following clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144:341-346
8. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M et al. (2007) Einfluss von Cornealer Hysterese und Cornealem Resistenzfaktor auf die Messung des intraokularen Druckes. Ophthalmologe 104:484-489
9. Herndon LW (2006) Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:115-119
10. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3118-3121
11. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790-3794
12. Kniestedt C, Kanngiesser HE (2006) Dynamische Konturtonometrie. Ophthalmologe 103:713-721
13. Luce DA (2005) Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:156-162
14. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN (2006) Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer. J Glaucoma 15:364-370
15. Recep OF, Hasiripi H, Cagil N, Sarikatipoglu H (2001 ) Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact and applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1787-1791
16. Tonnu PA, HoT, Newson T et al. (2005)The influence of central corneal thickness and age in intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact-tonometry, theTono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:851-854