Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1217-1222

  Nasir, Sazzad M ^a   Ostry, David J ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; ROBOTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS;

EID: 52949106826     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2193     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, R.E. & Kerr, A.G. A study of speech deterioration in post-lingually deafened adults. J. Laryngol. Otol. 96, 101-112 (1982).
2. Waldstein, R.S. Effects of post-lingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2099-2114 (1990).
3. Perkell, J.S. et al. Time course of speech changes in response to unanticipated short-term changes in hearing state. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 505-518 (2007).
4. Hamlet, S.L. & Stone, M.L. Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental protheses. J. Phon. 4, 199-218 (1976).
5. Lindblom, B., Lubker, J. & Gay, T. Formant frequencies of some xed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation. J. Phon. 7, 147-161 (1979).
6. Abbs, J.H. & Gracco, V.L. Sensorimotor actions in the control of multi-movement speech gestures. Trends Neurosci. 6, 391-395 (1983).
7. McFarland, D.H. & Baum, S. Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1865-1873 (1995).
8. Savariaux, C., Perrier, P. & Orliaguet, J.P. Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control of space in speech production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2428-2442 (1995).
9. McFarland, D.H., Baum, S.R. & Chabot, C. Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1093-1104 (1996).
10. Aasland, W.A., Baum, S.R. & McFarland, D.H. Electropalatographic, acoustic and perceptual data on adaptation to a palatal perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2372-2381 (2006).
11. Tremblay, S., Shiller, D.M. & Ostry, D.J. Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature 423, 866-869 (2003).
12. Nasir, S.M. & Ostry, D.J. Somatosensory precision in speech production. Curr. Biol. 16, 1918-1923 (2006).
13. Houde, J.F. & Jordan, F.M. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 1213-1216 (1998).
14. Jones, J.A. & Munhall, K.G. Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production. Curr. Biol. 15, 1768-1772 (2005).
15. Villacorta, V.M., Perkell, J.S. & Guenther, F.H. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2306-2319 (2007).
16. Guenther, F.H., Ghosh, S.S. & Tourville, J.A. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 96, 280-301 (2006).
17. Lackner, J.R. & Dizio, P. Rapid adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 299-313 (1994).
18. Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208-3224 (1994).
19. Purcell, D.W. & Munhall, K.G. Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2288-2297 (2006).
20. Kapteyn, T.S., Boezeman, E.H.J.F. & Snel, A.M. Bone-conduction measurement and calibration using the cancellationmethod. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 1297-1299 (1983).
21. Purcell, D., Kunov, H. & Cleghorn, W. Objective calibration of bone conductors using otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 20, 375-392 (1999).
22. Pörschmann, C. Influences of bone conduction and air conduction on the sound of one's own voice. Acta Acust. 86, 1038-1045 (2000).
23. Ernst, M.O. & Banks, M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429-433 (2002).
24. Sober, S.J. & Sabes, P.N. Multisensory integration during motor planning. J. Neurosci. 23, 6982-6992 (2003).
25. Svirsky, M.A. & Tobey, E.A. Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2895-2904 (1991).
26. Svirsky, M.A., Lane, H., Perkell, J.S. & Wozniak, J. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 1284-1300 (1992).