Multimedia arts learning in an activity system: New literacies for at-risk children

International Journal of Education and the Arts

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1-43

  Betts, J David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949097054     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15298094     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch L., Kurt, S., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76–107.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). The social foundations of thought and action: A social cognition theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist. 28(2), 117-148.
4. Bean, T. W., Bean, S. K., & Bean, K. F. (1999). Intergenerational conversations and two adolescents’ multiple literacies: Implications for Redefining Content Area Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 42(6), 438-448.
5. Belle, D. (1999). The afterschool lives of children: Alone and with others while their parents work. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Berghoff, B. (1993). Moving toward aesthetic literacy in the first grade. In D.J. Lin, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.) Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice (pp. 217-226). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
7. Betts, J. D. (2003). Art + technology integration: Developing an after school curriculum. Afterschool Matters, 2, 13-22.
8. Betts, J. D. (1999). Arts integration: Semiotic transmediation in the classroom. Arts and Learning Research Journal, 20(1). Retrieved January 25, 2003 from: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~bettsj/SemTrans.html.
9. Blanton, W., Greene, M., & Cole, M. (1999). Computer mediation for learning and play. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(3), 272-278.
10. Brown, K, & Cole, M. (2002). Cultural historical activity theory and the expansion of opportunities for learning after school. In G. Wells, & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the C21st: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
11. Bruce, C. B., & Levin J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79-102.
12. Burnaford, G., April, A., & Weiss, C. (Eds.). (2000). Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Butkowsky, I., & Willows, D. (1980). Cognitive-motivational characteristics of children varying in reading ability: Evidence for learned helplessness in poor readers. Journal of Education Psychology, 72(3), 408-422.
14. ChildTrends (2004). After-school activities. Retrieved December, 2004 from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/86AfterSchoolActivities.cfm.
15. Cole, M., & Engstrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. G. Salomon. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cole, Michael (1996) Cultural Psychology: A once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
17. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
18. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience (1983 ed.). NY: Perigree.
19. Dewey, J. (1943). The child and the curriculum: The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Eisner, E. W. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered. NY: Teachers College Press.
21. Eisner, E.W. (2004). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? International Journal of Education & the Arts, 5(4), 1-12.
22. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
23. Engström, Y. (2004). The activity system. Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Retrieved April 4, 2004 from: http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/activitysystem
24. Engström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25. Freedman, K. (2004). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. NY: Teachers College Press.
26. Freedman, K. (1996). Possibilities of interactive computer graphics for art instruction: A summary of research. Art Education, 44(3), 41-47.
27. Fox, J. A., & Newman, S. A. (1997). After-school crime or after-school programs: tuning into the prime time for violent juvenile crime and implications for national policy. A report to the United States Attorney General. Washington, DC: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. ED 412 319.
28. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. NY: Basic Books.
29. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse (2nd Ed.). NY: Routledge.
30. Gee, J. (2000). Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 412-420.
31. Gee, J. (2000) The New Literacy Studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. NY: Routledge.
32. Gee, J. (2003). New times and new literacies: Themes for a changing world. In A. Ball, & S. Freedman (Eds.), Bahktinian perspectives on language, literacy and learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Goldberg, M. R., & Phillips, A. (1992). Arts as education. Harvard Educational Review. Reprint Series, No. 24.
34. Halpern, R. (2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. The Teachers College Record. 104(2), 178-211.
35. Hamblen, K.A (1993). Research and theories supporting arts instruction for instrumental outcomes. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, ED 351 250.
36. Heath, S. B. (1994). The project of learning from the inner-city youth perspective. New Directions for Child Development, 63, 25-34.
37. Heath, S. B. (2001). Imagination actuality: Learning in the arts during the non-school hours. In E. B. Fiske (Ed.), Champions of change. Washington, D.C./Arts Education Partnership. Retrieved May 20, 2004 from: aep-arts.org/PDF%20Files/ChampsReport.pdf
38. Jackson, P. (1998). Dewey and the lessons of art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Kist, W. (2000). Beginning to create the new literacy classroom: What does the new literacy look like? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 43(8), 710-718.
40. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. NY: Routledge.
41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42. Leland, C. H., & Harste, J. C. (1994). Multiple ways of knowing: Curriculum in a new key. Language Arts, 71, 337-344.
43. Leu, Jr., D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging From the internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44. Marsh, D., & Penn, D. (1986). Self-efficacy and reading achievement. Journal of College Reading & Learning, 19, 78-86.
45. McCarty, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 465-471.
46. McNamee, D., & Sivright, S. (2002). Community supports for writing development among African American children. In G. Hull, & K. Schultz (Eds.), School’s out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice (pp. 169-197). NY: Teachers College Press.
47. Means, B., Peneul, W., & Padilla, C. (2001). The connected school: Technology and learning in high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48. Meyers, J., & Beach, R. (2001). Hypermedia authoring as critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 44(6).
49. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2002) Showing seeing: A critique of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 1(2), 165-181.
50. Moje, E.B., Ciechanowski, K.M., Kramer, K., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, R. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38-70.
51. Moll, L. C. (1991). Vygotsky in education. NY: Cambridge University Press.
52. Moll, L., & Greenberg, J. (1992). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction". In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. NY: Cambridge University Press.
53. Morrell, E. (2002). Toward a critical pedagogy of popular culture: Literacy development among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 46(1), 72-77.
54. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (1994). Funds of knowledge: A look at Luis Moll's research into hidden family resources. CITYSCHOOLS, 1(1), pp. 19-21.
55. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context & consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Parris, S. & Oka, E. (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Development Review, 6, 25-56.
57. Paz, J. & Betts, J. D. (1997). The arts as prevention: Program evaluation. In D. Magie, & C. E. Miller (Eds.), Art works!: Prevention programs for Youth and Communities. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts.
58. Posner, J.K., & Vandell, D.L. (1999). Low-income children’s after school care: Are there beneficial effects of after school programs? Child Development, 65(2), 440-56.
59. Reinking, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. xi–xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2004). Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In N. Duke, & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methods. NY: Guilford Press.
61. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In. J. Wertsch, P. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind. NY: Cambridge University Press.
62. Rubisov, V., & Margolis, A. (1996). Activity-oriented models of information-based instructional environments. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling (95th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago, IL.
63. Salomon, G. (1990). Cognitive effects with, and of, computer technology. Communication Research, 17, 26-44.
64. Salomon, G. (2000). It's not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts. Invited keynote address, 2000 Ed-Media Meeting. Retrieved October 11, 2004, from http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~gsalomon/new/.
65. Semali. L. M. (2002). Transmediation in the classroom: A semiotics-based media literacy framework. NY: Peter Lang.
66. Schunk, D., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19(3), 285-302.
67. Schwartz, W. (1996). After-school programs for urban youth. ERIC/CUE Digest No. 114. New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education [online]. Available: http://www.ericfacility.net/ericdigests/ed402370.html
68. Scribner, S. (1996). The future of literacy in a changing world. In E. Tobach, A. Warren, & A. Yost (Eds.), Mind and social practice. NY: Cambridge University Press.
69. Shann, M. H. (2001). Students' use of time outside of school: A case for after-school programs for urban middle school youth. The Urban Review, 33(4), 339-356.
70. Snyder, L. (1998). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. NY: Routledge.
71. Soja, E. W. (1996). Third space: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real and imagined places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
72. Spalter, A. (1999). The computer in the visual arts. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
73. Street, B. (2003). What's “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1-14. Available at: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/vol5nr2/al152.htm
74. Suhor, C. (1992). Semiotics and the English language arts. Language Arts, 69, 228-230.
75. Warren, A., & Yost, A. (2001). Making afterschool count: Communities and schools working together. Making Afterschool Count, 4(1).
76. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Vygotsky, L.S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.