Comparative analysis of university-government-enterprise co-authorship networks in three scientific domains in the region of Madrid

Information Research

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Olmeda Gómez, Carlos ^a   Perianes Rodríguez, Antonio ^a   Ovalle Perandones, María Antonia ^a   Moya Anegón, Félix ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949091595     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Acosta, M. & Coronado, D. (2003). Science technology flows in Spanish regions. An analysis of scientific citations in patents Research Policy, 32(10), 1783-1803.
2. Albert R., Jeong, H. & Barabasi, A.L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks, Nature, 406(6794), 378-382.
3. ANEP. (2006). Áreas temáticas. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.micinn.es/ciencia/jsp/plantilla.jsp?area=anep&id= 24&contenido=/anep/htm/areas.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4RtacCT)
4. Bayona Saez, C., Garcia Marco, T. & Huerta Arribas, E. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R & D Management, 32(4), 321-341.
5. Barabasi, A.L. & Reka, A. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
6. Bordons, M. & Gómez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & B. Atkins (eds.) The web of knowledge. A festschriff in honor of Eugene Garfield, (pp. 197-213). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
7. Borgatti, S.P. & Everett, M.G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375-395.
8. Calero, C., Van Leeuwen, T.N. & Tijssen, R.J.W. (2007). Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: network analyses of co-publications within and between firms. Scientometrics, 71(1), 87-99.
9. CINDOC (2006). La investigación del CSIC a través de sus publicaciones científicas de difusión internacional (1981-2003) [The investigation of the CSIC through its scientific publications on international diffusion (1981-2003)]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
10. Cohen, W., Nelson, R. & Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
11. Cruz Castro L. & Sanz Menéndez L. (2005).The employment of PhDs in firms: trajectories, mobility and innovation. Madrid: Spanish Policy Research in Innovation and Technology, Training and Education. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab2/dt-0507.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4SY1Qud)
12. Dasgupta, P. & David, P.A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
13. Durán Romero G. (2003). Análisis y comparación de las patentes universitarias españolas como indicador de resultados del esfuerzo investigador. [Analysis and comparison of the Spanish university patents as an indicator of the results of the research effort.] Madrid: Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deportes.
14. European Union (2002). Council Decision of 30 September 2002 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: 'Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area' (2002-2006I. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/documents_r5/natdir0000066/ s_1883005_20040723_094518_1883en.pdf
15. European Union. (2006) Council Decision of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme 'Cooperation' implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_400/ l_40020061230en00860242.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation. org/5b4TVW2m7)
16. Fundación COTEC (1999). Relaciones de las empresas con el sistema público de I+D. [Relationships between companies and the public system of R&D] Madrid: Fundación COTEC.
17. Glänzel, W. & Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationally measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54 (1), 75-98.
18. Glänzel W. & Schubert A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp.257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),1360-1380.
20. Granovetter, M.S. (1982). The strenght of weak ties. A network theory revisited. In: Peter V. Marsden & Nan Lin (Eds.) Social structure and network analysis, (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Grupp H. & Hinze, S. (1994). International orientation, efficiency of and regard for research in East and West Germany: a bibliometric investigation of aspects of technology genesis in the United Germany. Scientometrics, 29(1), 83-113.
22. Hannemann, R.A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/index.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4WabIyS)
23. Haythornthwaite, C. (1998). A social network study of the growth of community among distance learners. Information Research, 4 (1), paper 49. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://informationr.net/ir/4-1/ paper49.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4WhbXgi)
24. Kamada, T. & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.
25. Katz, J.S., Hicks, D., Sharp, M. & Martin, B.R. (1995). The changing shape of British science. Brighton, U.K.: University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit.
26. Leonard, R. & Onyx, J. Networking through loose and strong ties: an Australian qualitative study. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Non Profit Organizations, 14 (2), 189-203.
27. Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5 (4). Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.004/th.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4WwndU2)
28. Li-Chun, Y., Krestchmer, H., Hanneman, R.A. & Ze-yuan, L. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: an analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1599-1613.
29. Ma, N. & Guan, J. (2005). An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 65(3), 343-355.
30. Merton, R.K. (1968).The Matthew Effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 199 (3810), 55-63.
31. Meyer-Krahmer, F. & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
32. Mora Valentin, E.V. (2002). A theoretical review of co-operative relationships between firms and universities. Science and Public Policy, 29(1), 37-46.
33. Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E. & Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145.
34. Nagpaul, P.S. (2002). Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics, 54(2), 213-228.
35. Nakao, K. (1990). Distribution of measures of centrality: enumerated distributions of Freeman's graph centrality measures. Connections, 13(3), 10-22.
36. Olmeda-Gómez, C., Ortiz, V., Aragón, I., Ovalle-Perandones, M.A. & Perianes-Rodríguez, A. (2007a). Indicadores científicos de Madrid (ISI. Web of Science. 1990-2003). [Scientific indicators of Madrid (ISI, Web of Science, 1990-2003)] Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid. Retrieved 23 September,m 2008 from http://www.madridmasd.org/ informacionidi/biblioteca/publicacion/doc/25_iccm.zip
37. Olmeda-Gómez C. Perianes-Rodriguez A., Ovalle-Perandones MA. & Gallardo-Martín A, (2007b). La investigación en colaboración de las universidades españolas. Análisis estructura y topología 2000-2004. [Research on collaboration in Spanish universities. Structured analysis and topology 2000-2004.] Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.centrorecursos.com/mec/ayudas/repositorio/ 20061130110116Informe_Mec_EA_2006-0024.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4XoSW13)
38. Ondategui, J.C (2001). Los parques científicos y tecnológicos en España: retos y oportunidades. [Scientific and technological parks in Spain: challenges and opportunities.] Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid.
39. Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Sciences, 28(6), 441-453.
40. Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W.W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.
41. Plaza, L., Albert, A. & Granadino, B. (2006). El flujo de conocimientos desde el sistema público español de I+D a las industrias biotecnológicas. [The flow of knowledge from the Spanish public system of R&D to the biotechnological industries] In J. Sebastián & E. Muñoz. (Eds.). Radiografía de la investigación pública en España. [X-ray of public research in Spain] (pp. 373-392). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
42. Powell, W.W., White, D.R., Hoput, K.W. & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205.
43. Price, D.J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515. Retrieved 8 September, 2008 from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/pricenetworks1965.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5b4YhVgN9)
44. Rodríguez Díaz, J.A. (1995). Análisis estructural y de redes. [Structural and network analysis] Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
45. Santoro, M.D. & Chakrabati, A.K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163-1180.
46. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C.H., Fischer, M.M. & Frölich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303-328.
47. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L. & Fombrun, C.H. (1979). Social network analysis for organization. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519.
48. Vargas-Quesada, B. & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin: Springer.
49. Wagner, C.S., Cave, J., Tesch, T., Alle, V.,Thomson, R. Leydesdorff, L. & Botterman, M. (2005). ERAnets. Evaluation of NETworks of collaboration among participants in IST research and their evolution to collaborations in the European Research Area (ERA). Leiden, the Netherlands: Rand Europe
50. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1998). Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Watts, D.J. & Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.
52. Woolcock, M. & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225-249.
53. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627-657.