Cultures of undergraduate teaching at research universities

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 25-37

  Serow, Robert C ^a   Van Dyk, Pamela B ^a   McComb, Errin M ^a   Harrold, Adrian T ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Culture of teaching; Research; Research universities; Scholarship of teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649115796     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020416306430     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altbach, P., & Lewis, L. (1996). The academic profession in international perspective. In P. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries (pp. 3-48). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
2. Austin, A. (1992). Faculty cultures. In B. Clark & G. Neaves (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Higher Education (pp. 1614-1623). Oxford: Pergamon.
3. Blackburn, R., & Lawrence, J. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Braxton, J. M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict? (pp. 5-14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Bryce, J. (1995). The American commonwealth. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Original work published in 1889.
8. Clark, B.(1987). The academic life: Small world, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9. Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.
11. Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Hearn, J. C. (1999). Faculty salary structures in research universities: Implications for productivity. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 123-173). New York: Falmer.
13. Huber, R. M. (1992). How professors play the cat guarding the cream: Why we're paying more and getting less in higher education. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
14. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Paulsen, M., & Feldman, K. (1995). Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement. Washington DC: ASHE-ERIC Report, 24, no. 2.
16. Serow, R. (2000). Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education, 40, 449-463.
17. Serow, R., Brawner, C. & Demery, J. (1999). Instructional reform at research universities: Studying faculty motivation. Review of Higher Education, 22, 411-423.
18. Smith, P. (1990). Killing the spirit: Higher education in America. New York: Viking.
19. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Trow, M.(1984). The analysis of status. In B. dark (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views (pp. 132-164). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Trow, M. (1999). From mass higher education to universal access: The American advantage. Minerva, 37, 303-328.
22. Turner, F. J. (1996). The frontier in American history. New York: Dover. Original work published in 1920.