Taxonomic revision of the Lecania cyrtella group based on molecular and morphological evidence

Mycologia

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 397-416

  Næsborg, Rikke Reese ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Haplotype network analysis; Key to species; Lichens; Maximum parsimony; New species; Species descriptions; Statistical parsimony

Indexed keywords

KEYSTONE SPECIES; LICHEN; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; NEW SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

CANADA; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN EUROPE; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; SCANDINAVIA;

ASCOMYCOTA; LECANIA (ASCOMYCETE); LECANIA CYRTELLA; LECANIA CYRTELLINA; LECANIA DUBITANS; LECANIA ERYSIBE; RAMALINACEAE;

FUNGAL DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; EUROPE; FUNGUS SPORE; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY;

ASCOMYCOTA; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; EUROPE; HAPLOTYPES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPORES, FUNGAL;

EID: 52649097874     PISSN: 00275514     EISSN: 15572536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3852/07-080R     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acharius E. 1799 (1798). Lich suec Prod. Linköping, Sweden.
2. -. 1803. Meth Lich. Stockholm, Sweden.
3. -. 1808. Förteckning på de i Sverige växande arter af Lafvarnes famille. Nov Act Reg Acad Sci Holm XXIX, 259-283.
4. -. 1814. Syn Lich. Lund, Sweden.
5. Anzi M. 1860. Catalogus lichenum quos in provincia Sondriensi collegit et ordinavit et in ordinem system-aticum digessit presbyter M. Anzi. Novi-Comi, Italy: C. Franchi.
6. -. 1868. Lichenes rariores Longobardiae exsiccati, quos collegit ediditque presb. Martinus Anzi in seminario Novo-Comensi professor. Novi-Comi, Italy: Fasc. XIII, No. 516.
7. Arnold F. 1859. Die Lichenen des fränkischen Jura. Flora Regensburg 42:145-156.
8. -. 1870. Lichenologisch Fragmente X. Flora Regens-burg 53:465-488.
9. -. 1884. Die Lichenen des fränkischen Jura. Flora Regensburg 67:403-434.
10. Bridge PD, Hawksworth DL. 1998. What molecular biology has to tell us at the species level in lichenized fungi. Lichenologist 30:307-320.
11. Brodo IM, Sharnoff SD, Sharnoff S. 2001. Lichens of North America. New Haven and London: Yale Univ Press.
12. Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91:553-556.
13. -, -. 2001. A microbial population-species interface: nested cladistic and coalescent inference with multilocus data. Mol Ecol 10:947-964.
14. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657-1660.
15. Crespo A, Cubero OF. 1998. A molecular approach to the circumscription and evaluation of some genera segregated from Parmelia sensu lato. Lichenologist 30:369-380.
16. Cummings MP, Handley SA, Myers DS, Reed DL, Rokas A, Winka K. 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst Biol 52: 477-487.
17. Elenkin AA. 1907. Neue Flechten aus dem europäischen Russland. J Bot 10:1-10.
18. Erixon P, Svennblad B, Britton T, Oxelman B. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol 52: 665-673.
19. Foucard T. 2001. Svenska skorplavar och svampar som växer på dem. Stockholm, Sweden: Interpublishing.
20. Fries E. 1822. Beskrifning pa nya Lafslägten. Andra styket. Act Reg Acad Scien Holm, 251-276.
21. Fries TM. 1871. Lich Scand. Vo. 1. Uppsala, Sweden: Schultz.
22. Galløe O. 1929. Natural History of the Danish Lichens. Copenhagen, Denmark.
23. Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113-118.
24. Goloboff P, Farris JS, Nixon K. 2003. TNT: tree analysis using new technology. Version 1 Publ by authors.
25. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Series 41:95-98.
26. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
27. James PW, Purvis OW. 1992. Lecania Massal. (1853). In: Purvis OW, Coppins BJ, Hawksworth DJ, James PW, Moore DM, eds. The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London, United Kingdom: Natural History Museum Publications 285-292.
28. Jatta A. 1889. Monographia lichenum Italiae Meridionalis. Trani, Italy: V. Vecchi.
29. -. 1900. Syll Lich ital. Trani, Italy: V. Vecchi.
30. Kilias R. 1981. Revision gesteinsbewohnender Sippen der Flechtengattung Catillaria Massal. in Europa. Hezogia 5:209-448.
31. Körber GW. 1860. Parerg Lich. Breslau, Poland, p 97-192.
32. Kroken S, Taylor JW. 2001. A gene genealogical approach to recognize phylogenetic species boundaries in the lichenized fungus Letharia. Mycologia 93:38-53.
33. LaGreca S. 1999. A phylogenetic evaluation of the Ramalina Americana chemotype complex (lichenized Ascomycota, Ramalinaceae) based on rDNA ITS sequence data. Bryologist 102:602-618.
34. Lettau G. 1912. Beiträge zur Lichenographie von Thürin-gen. Hedwigia 52:81-264.
35. Lindblom L, Ekman S. 2005. Molecular evidence supports the distinction between Xanthoria parietina and X. aureola (Teloschistaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycol Res 109:187-199.
36. -, -. 2006. Genetic variation and population differentiation in the lichen-forming ascomycete Xanthoria parietina on the island Storfosna, central Norway. Mol Ecol 15:1545-1559.
37. Mann WB. 1825. Lichenum in Bohemia observatorum dispositio succinctaque descriptio Auctore Wenceslao Mann. Prague, Czech Republic,
38. Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. 1996. Testing for phyloge-netic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Graminae). Syst Biol 45:524-545.
39. Massalongo AB. 1852. Ric Lich Crost. Verona, Italy: Frizerio.
40. Mattsson J-E, Wedin M. 1998. Phylogeny of the Parmeliaceae - DNA data versus morphological data. Lichenologist 30:463-472.
41. Mayrhofer M. 1988. Studien über die saxicolen Arten der Flechtengattung Lecania in Europa II. Lecania s. str. Bibl Lich 28:1-133.
42. Meyer B, Printzen C. 2000. Proposal for a standardized nomenclature and characterization of insoluble lichen pigments. Lichenologist 32:571-583.
43. Mort ME, Archibald JK, Randle CP, Levsen ND, O'Leary TR, Topalov K, Wiegand CM, Crawford DJ. 2007. Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: utility of rapidly evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS loci. Am J Bot 94:173-183.
44. Mudd W. 1861. Man Br Lich. Darlington, UK.
45. Müller Argoviensis J. 1894. Conspectus systematicus lichenum Novae Zelandiae, quem elaboravit. Bull Herb Boissier 2:1-114.
46. Nylander W. 1855. Essai d'une nouvelle classification des lichens, (second mémoire). Mém Soc Sci Nat Cherbourg 3:161-202.
47. -. 1861. Lich Scand. Notiser ur sällskapets pro fauna et flora fennica förhandlingar 5:1-313.
48. -. 1867. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam europaeam. Flora (Regensburg) 50:326-330.
49. -. 1873. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam europaeam. Flora (Regensburg) 56:17-23.
50. -. 1876. Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam euro-paeam. Flora (Regensburg) 59:231-239.
51. Poelt J. 1969. Bestimmungsschlüssel Europäischer Flechten. Lehre, Germany: Verlag von J. Cramer.
52. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
53. -, -. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trend Ecol Evol 16:37-45.
54. Printzen C, Ekman S. 2002. Genetic variability and its geographical distribution in the widely disjunct Cavernularia hultenii. Lichenologist 34:101-111.
55. -, -. 2003. Local population subdivision in the lichen Cladonia subcervicornis as revealed by mitochon-drial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 intron sequences. Mycologia 95:399-406.
56. -, -, Tønsberg T. 2003. Phylogeography of Cavernularia hultenii: evidence of slow genetic drift in a widely disjunct lichen. Mol Evol 12:1473-1486.
57. Reese Næsborg R, Ekman S, Tibell L. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Lecania (Ramalinaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycol Res 111:581-591.
58. Röhling JC. 1813. Deutschlands Flora. Vol. III, 2. Abt. Frankfurt a M, Germany.
59. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinfor-matics 19:1572-1574.
60. Sandstede H. 1912. Die Flechten des nordwestdeutschen Tieflandes und der deutschen Nordseeinseln. Abhan-dlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen 21:337-383.
61. Santesson R. 1993. The lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sweden and Norway. Lund, Sweden: SBT-förlaget.
62. -, Moberg R, Nordin A, Tønsberg T, Vitikainen O. 2004. Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fen-noscandinavia. Uppsala, Sweden: Museum of Evolution.
63. Smith AL. 1918. Monogr Br Lich. London, UK: British Museum: Part 1.
64. Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phyloge-netics. PNAS 99:16138-16143.
65. Sydow P. 1887. Die Flechten Deutschlands. Anleitung zur Kenntniss und Bestimmung der deutschen Flechten. Berlin, Germany,
66. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
67. Tibell L. 2006. Calicium in the Indian Himalayas. J Hattori Bot Lab 100:809-852.
68. van den Boom PPG. 1992. The saxicolous species of the lichen genus Lecania in The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg. Nov Hedwig 54:229-254.
69. -, Ryan BD. 2004. Lecania. In: NashIIITH, Ryan BD, Diederich P, Gries C, Bungartz F, eds. The lichen flora of the greater Sonoran desert region. Lichens Unlimit 2:133-161.
70. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York and London: Academic Press. p 315-322.