Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-06, Issue , 2008, Pages 30-35

  Hogg, Tad ^a   Wilkinson, Dennis M ^a   Szabo, Gabor ^a   Brzozowski, Michael J ^a  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT CREATION; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SOCIAL NETWORKS; STRONG CORRELATIONS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; TECHNICAL REPORTS; WEB COMMUNITIES;

INFORMATION THEORY;

SPRINGS (COMPONENTS);

EID: 52449128775     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Adamic, L. A.; Buyukkokten, O.; and Adar, E. 2003. A social network caught in the web. First Monday 8(6).
2. Ahn, Y.-Y., et al. 2007. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In Proc. of 2007 Intl. Conf. on the World Wide Web, 835-844.
3. Amaral, L. A. N.; Scala, A.; Barthelemy, M.; and Stanley, H. E. 2000. Classes of small-world networks. Proc. of the Natl. Acad. Sci. 97:11149-11152.
4. boyd, d. 2006. Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday 11(12).
5. Brzozowski, M.; Hogg, T.; and Szabo, G. 2008. Friends and foes: Ideological social networking. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI2008). ACM Press.
6. Chickering, D. M. 2002. The WinMine toolkit. Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-103, Microsoft.
7. Clauset, A. 2005. Finding local community structure in networks. Physical Review E 72:026132.
8. Cohen, P. R. 1995. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Gladwell, M. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little Brown.
10. Goldberg, D.; Nichols, D.; Oki, B. M.; and Terry, D. 1992. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM 35(12):61-70.
11. Golder, S. A.; Wilkinson, D. M.; and Huberman, B. A. 2007. Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Conf. on Communities and Technologies (CT2007).
12. Guha, R.; Kumar, R.; Raghavan, P.; and Tomkins, A. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proc. of the 13th Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW2004), 403-412. New York: ACM.
13. Hogg, T., and Adamic, L. 2004. Enhancing reputation mechanisms via online social networks. In Proc. of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'04), 236-237. ACM Press.
14. Huberman, B. A., and Adamic, L. A. 1999. Growth dynamics of the World Wide Web. Nature 401:131.
15. Lam, C. 2004. SNACK: incorporating social network information in automated collaborative filtering. In Proc. of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'04), 254-255. ACM Press.
16. Lerman, K. 2007. Social information processing in social news aggregation, preprint arxiv.org/abs/cs.cy/0703087.
17. Leskovec, J.; Adamic, L. A.; and Huberman, B. A. 2007. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web 1(1).
18. Limpert, E.; Stahel, W. A.; and Abbt, M. 2001. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. BioScience 51:341-352.
19. McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415-444.
20. Mitzenmacher, M. 2004. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Mathematics 1:226-251.
21. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2): 167-256.
22. Newman, M. E. J. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:8577-8582.
23. Resnick, P., and Varian, H. R. 1997. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3):56-58.
24. Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393:440-442.
25. Watts, D. J.; Dodds, P. S.; and Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Identity and search in social networks. Science 296:1302-1305.
26. Wilkinson, D. M., and Huberman, B. A. 2007. Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday 12(4).
27. Wu, F., and Huberman, B. A. 2007. Novelty and collective attention. Proc. of the Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:17599-17601.