Using a shared representation to generate action and social language for a virtual dialogue environment

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-04, Issue , 2008, Pages 38-45

  Gupta, Swati ^a   Walker, Marilyn A ^a   Romano, Daniela M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); VIRTUAL REALITY;

CONVERSATIONAL SYSTEMS; EMBODIED AGENTS; GENERATION PROCESS; LANGUAGE LEARNING; PLANNING REPRESENTATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIORS; SOCIAL DISTANCES; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; TECHNICAL REPORTS; USER PERCEPTIONS; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 52449127196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. André, E., Rist, T., Mulken, S.v., Kiesen, M., & Baldes, S. 2000. The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In Embodied Conversational Agents (pp. 220-255). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
2. André, E., Rist, T., Mulken, S.v., Kiesen, M., & Baldes, S. 2000. The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In Embodied Conversational Agents (pp. 220-255). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
3. Bersot, O., El-Guedj, P.O., God'ereaux, C. and Nugues. P. 1998. A conversational agent to help navigation & collaboration in virtual worlds. Virtual Reality,3(1):71-82.
4. Blum, A., Furst, M. 1997 Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90, 281-300.
5. Cassell, J. and Thórisson, K.R. 1999. The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13: 519-538.
6. Cassell, J. Bickmore, Timothy W. Negotiated Collusion. 2003. Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 13(1-2):89-132.
7. Culpeper, J. 1996. (Im)politeness in dramatic dialogue. Exploring the Language of Drama: From text to context. Routledge, London.
8. Dautenhahn, K. 2000. Socially Intelligent Agents: The Human in the Loop (Papers from the 2000 AAAI Fall Symposium). The AAAI Press, Technical Report.
9. Eichner, T., Prendinger, H., André, E. and Ishizuka, M. 2007. Attentive presentation agents. Proc. 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA-07), Springer LNCS 4722. pp 283-295.
10. Grosz, B.J., Sidner, C.L. 1990. Plans for discourse. In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J.L., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Gupta, S., Walker, M.A., Romano, D.M. 2007. How Rude are You?: Evaluating Politeness and Affect in Interaction. Affective Computing & Intelligent Interaction (ACII-2007).
12. Johnson, L.W. and Rizzo, P. and Bosma, W.E. and Ghijsen, M. and van Welbergen, H. 2004. Generating socially appropriate tutorial dialog. In: ISCA Workshop on Affective Dialogue Systems, pp. 254-264.
13. Johnson, L., Mayer, R., André, E., & Rehm, M. 2005. Cross-cultural evaluation of politeness in tactics for pedagogical agents. Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
14. Kopp, S., Jung, B., Lessmann, N. and Wachsmuth, I. 2003. Max - A multimodal assistant in virtual reality construction. KI Zeitschift (German Magazine of Artificial Intelligence), Special Issue on Embodied Conversational Agents, vol.4, pp.11-17.
15. Microsoft. 1998. Developing for Microsoft Agent. Microsoft Press.
16. op den Akker, H.J.A. and Nijholt, A. 2000. Dialogues for Embodied Agents in Virtual Environments. In: Natural Language Processing - NLP 2000, 2nd Int. Conf. pp. 358-369. LNAI 1835.
17. Paiva, A., Dias, J., & Aylett, R.S. 2005. Learning by feeling: evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence: 19 (3-4), 235-266.
18. Poggi, I., Pelachaud, C., de Rosis, F., Carofiglio, V., De Carolis, B. 2005. GRETA. A Believable Embodied Conversational Agent. in O. Stock and M. Zancarano, eds, Multimodal Intelligent Information Presentation, Kluwer.
19. Prendinger, Helmut and Ishizuka, Mitsuru. 2001. Let's talk! Socially intelligent agents for language conversation training. IEEE Transactions on xSystems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp 465-471.
20. Porayska-Pomsta, K. 2003. Influence of Situational Context on Language Production: Modelling Teachers' Corrective Responses. PhD Thesis. School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.
21. Rehm, M. and Andre, E. 2007. Informing the Design of Agents by Corpus Analysis. Conversational Informatics, Edited by T. Nishida.
22. th National Conf. on AI, pp. 814-819.
23. Takenobu, T., Tomofumi, K., Suguru, S., Manabu, O. 2003. Bridging the Gap between Language and Action. IVA 2003, LNAI 2792, pp. 127-135.
24. nd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
25. Wahlster, W., Andre, E., Finkler, W., Profitlich, J. J. and Rist, T. 1993. Plan-based Integration of Natural Language and Graphics Generation', Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2):3 87-428.
26. Walker, M.A. 1996. The effect of resource limits and task complexity on collaborative planning in dialogue. Artificial Intelligence Journal 85, 1-2.
27. Walker, M., Cahn, J. and Whittaker, S. J. 1997. Improving linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In Proc. Autonomous Agents'97. 96-105. ACM Press.
28. Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Rizzo, P., Shaw,E., & Mayer, R. 2005. Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents. Proceedings of IUI '05. ACM Press.
29. Watts, Richard J. Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. 1992. Introduction, in Watts, R, Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.1-17.