Electric to acoustic pitch matching: A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting (European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0655-3);Electric to acoustic pitch matching: A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 265, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1321-1328

  Nardo, Walter Di ^a   Cantore, Italo ^a   Marchese, Maria Raffaella ^a   Cianfrone, Francesca ^a   Scorpecci, Alessandro ^a   Giannantonio, Sara ^a   Paludetti, Gaetano ^a  

^a FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Matching; Performance; Pitch

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VOWEL;

EID: 52449118829     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0674-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. B Gantz C Turner K Gfeller M Lowder 2005 Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing Laryngoscope 115 796 802
2. P Nelson S-H Jin 2004 Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners J Acoust Soc Am 115 286
3. MK Qin AJ Oxenham 2006 Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech J Acoust Soc Am 119 2417 2426
4. C Olszewski K Gfeller R Froman J Stordahl 2005 Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children Cochlear Implants Int 6 123 140
5. Y Kong G Stickney F Zeng 2005 Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing J Acoust Soc Am 117 1351 1361
6. H McDermott 2004 Music perception with cochlear implants: a review Trends Amplif 8 49 81
7. C Dunn RS Tyler SA Witt BJ Gantz 2006 Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115 425 432
8. K Gfeller C Turner J Oleson X Zhang B Gantz R Froman C Olszewski 2007 Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise Ear Hear 28 412 423
9. K Fishman RV Shannon WH Slattery 1997 Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant processor J Speech Hear Res 40 1201 1215
10. JB Firszt DB Koch M Downing L Litvak 2007 Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients Otol Neurotol 28 629 636
11. W Di Nardo I Cantore F Cianfrone P Melillo A Fetoni G Paludetti 2007 Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception Acta Otolaryngol 127 370 377
12. PJ Blamey GJ Dooley ES Parisi GM Clark 1996 Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations Hear Res 99 139 150
13. MF Dorman T Spahr R Gifford L Loiselle S McKarns T Holden M Skinner C Finley 2007 An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted Ear JARO 8 234 240
14. U Baumann A Nobbe 2006 The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function Hear Res 213 34 42
15. DD Greenwood 1990 A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later J Acoust Soc Am 87 2592 2605
16. WM Rabinowitz D Eddington 1995 Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the Ineraid cochlear implant Ear Hear 16 450 458
17. QJ Fu RV Shannon 1999 Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant Ear Hear 20 332 344
18. LM Friesen RV Shannon WH Slattery 3rd 1999 The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant Am J Otol 20 729 734
19. QJ Fu RV Shannon JJ Galvin 3rd 2002 Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant J Acoust Soc Am 112 1664 1674
20. LAJ Reiss CW Turner SR Erenberg BJ Gantz 2007 Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time JARO 8 241 257