Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 370-377

  Nardo, Walter Di ^a   Cantore, Italo ^a   Cianfrone, Francesca ^a   Melillo, Pietro ^a   Fetoni, Anna Rita ^a   Paludetti, Gaetano ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Cochlear implant; Frequencies; Pitch

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 34147131819     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480601158765     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Evans EF. Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system. Some physiological pros and cons. Audiology 1978;17:369-420.
2. Greenwood DD. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961;33:1344-56.
3. Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;Suppl 236:1-135.
4. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-605.
5. Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blamey PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrodes prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:2659-69.
6. Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983;11:157-89.
7. Dorman MF, Smith M, Smith L, Parkin JL. The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1677-9.
8. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res 1996;99:139-50.
9. Baumann U, Nobbe A. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hear Res 2006;213:34-42.
10. Boex C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kos MI, Pelizzone M. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;1:1-15.
11. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:106-15.
12. Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackman DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JK. Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1978;24:1-5.
13. Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the length of Organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal's canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:701-9.
14. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S, Deggouj N, Dequine O, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2005;125:481-91.
15. Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Rigante M, Paludetti G. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation. Audiol Neurotol 2007 (in press).
16. Strange PH. Pitch dependence on intensity in unilateral deafness with recruitment of loudness. J Physiol 1957;137:355-64.