-
1
-
-
16644376027
-
Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers
-
Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Freed K, Jenkins CB, Paulson EK, et al. (2004) Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. Am J Roentgenol 183: 1545-1550.
-
(2004)
Am J Roentgenol
, vol.183
, pp. 1545-1550
-
-
Kliewer, M.A.1
DeLong, D.M.2
Freed, K.3
Jenkins, C.B.4
Paulson, E.K.5
-
2
-
-
34250746919
-
Publication bias and merit in ecology
-
Lortie CJ, Aarssen LW, Budden AE, Koricheva JK, Leimu R, et al. (2007) Publication bias and merit in ecology. Oikos 116: 1247-1253.
-
(2007)
Oikos
, vol.116
, pp. 1247-1253
-
-
Lortie, C.J.1
Aarssen, L.W.2
Budden, A.E.3
Koricheva, J.K.4
Leimu, R.5
-
4
-
-
20044379252
-
Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology
-
2005
-
Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, Pickhardt PJ, Provenzale JM (2005) Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. Am J Roentgenol 184: 1731-1735.
-
(1731)
Am J Roentgenol
, vol.184
-
-
Kliewer, M.A.1
Freed, K.S.2
DeLong, D.M.3
Pickhardt, P.J.4
Provenzale, J.M.5
-
5
-
-
33646165729
-
Training the Reviewer?
-
Millett D (2006) Training the Reviewer? J Orthod 33: 1-2.
-
(2006)
J Orthod
, vol.33
, pp. 1-2
-
-
Millett, D.1
-
6
-
-
34250374457
-
The ups and downs of peer review
-
Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, Gaggar A, Kapoor N, et al. (2007) The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 31: 145-152.
-
(2007)
Adv Physiol Educ
, vol.31
, pp. 145-152
-
-
Benos, D.J.1
Bashari, E.2
Chaves, J.M.3
Gaggar, A.4
Kapoor, N.5
-
7
-
-
0025058484
-
What do peer reviewers do?
-
Lock S, Smith J (1990) What do peer reviewers do? J Am Med Assoc 263: 1341-1343.
-
(1990)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.263
, pp. 1341-1343
-
-
Lock, S.1
Smith, J.2
-
8
-
-
0025122054
-
Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?
-
Yankauer A (1990) Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review? J Am Med Assoc 263: 1338-1340.
-
(1990)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.263
, pp. 1338-1340
-
-
Yankauer, A.1
-
9
-
-
0028365095
-
Peer review: Crude and understudied, but indispensible
-
Kassirer JP, Campion EW (1994) Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensible. J Am Med Assoc 272: 96-97.
-
(1994)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.272
, pp. 96-97
-
-
Kassirer, J.P.1
Campion, E.W.2
-
10
-
-
84991176621
-
Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication
-
Lloyd ME (1990) Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication. J Appl Behav Anal 23: 539-543.
-
(1990)
J Appl Behav Anal
, vol.23
, pp. 539-543
-
-
Lloyd, M.E.1
-
11
-
-
0028306866
-
Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions
-
Garfunkel JM, Ulshen MH, Hamrick HJ, Lawson EE (1994) Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. J Am Med Assoc 272: 137-138.
-
(1994)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.272
, pp. 137-138
-
-
Garfunkel, J.M.1
Ulshen, M.H.2
Hamrick, H.J.3
Lawson, E.E.4
-
12
-
-
0036680048
-
Gender bias in the refereeing process?
-
Tregenza T (2002) Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends Ecol Evol 17: 349-350.
-
(2002)
Trends Ecol Evol
, vol.17
, pp. 349-350
-
-
Tregenza, T.1
-
13
-
-
0028234337
-
Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts: Effects of referee characteristics and publication language
-
Nylenna M, Riis P, Karisson Y (1994) Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts: effects of referee characteristics and publication language. J Am Med Assoc 272: 149-151.
-
(1994)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.272
, pp. 149-151
-
-
Nylenna, M.1
Riis, P.2
Karisson, Y.3
-
14
-
-
33645790459
-
Is peer review a game of chance?
-
Neff BD, Olden JD (2006) Is peer review a game of chance? BioScience 56: 333-340.
-
(2006)
BioScience
, vol.56
, pp. 333-340
-
-
Neff, B.D.1
Olden, J.D.2
-
15
-
-
0035479442
-
Testing and adjusting for publication bias
-
Moller AP, Jennions MD (2001) Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 580-586.
-
(2001)
Trends Ecol Evol
, vol.16
, pp. 580-586
-
-
Moller, A.P.1
Jennions, M.D.2
-
17
-
-
1542318329
-
Publication and rejection among successful ecologists
-
Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2004) Publication and rejection among successful ecologists. BioScience 54: 234-239.
-
(2004)
BioScience
, vol.54
, pp. 234-239
-
-
Cassey, P.1
Blackburn, T.M.2
-
18
-
-
52449091768
-
-
UNESCO (2000) Table 6: Cultural Practices and Heritage: Leading Languages. In: UNESCO, World Cultural Report - Cultural Diversity, Conflict and Pluralism. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. pp 312-315.
-
UNESCO (2000) Table 6: Cultural Practices and Heritage: Leading Languages. In: UNESCO, World Cultural Report - Cultural Diversity, Conflict and Pluralism. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. pp 312-315.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0004252445
-
-
3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc
-
Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
-
(1996)
Biostatistical Analysis
-
-
Zar, J.H.1
-
21
-
-
52449131994
-
-
SAS (2003) Release 5.1.1, SAS Institute Inc
-
SAS (2003) Release 5.1.1. - SAS Institute Inc.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
37648999022
-
Double-blind review favors increased representation of female authors
-
Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva JK, Leimu R, et al. (2008) Double-blind review favors increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 4-6.
-
(2008)
Trends Ecol Evol
, vol.23
, pp. 4-6
-
-
Budden, A.E.1
Tregenza, T.2
Aarssen, L.W.3
Koricheva, J.K.4
Leimu, R.5
-
23
-
-
10044238707
-
-
National Science Board , Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
-
National Science Board (2006) Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
-
(2006)
Science and Engineering Indicators 2006
-
-
-
24
-
-
52449121161
-
-
UNESCO Institute for Statistics in collaboration with the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (2006) Women in science: under-represented and undermeasured. Montreal: UIS Bulletin on Science and Technology Statistics
-
UNESCO Institute for Statistics in collaboration with the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (2006) Women in science: under-represented and undermeasured. Montreal: UIS Bulletin on Science and Technology Statistics.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
23844447000
-
More women in science
-
Handelsman J, Cantor N, Carnes M, Denton D, Fine E, et al. (2005) More women in science. Science 309: 1190.
-
(2005)
Science
, vol.309
, pp. 1190
-
-
Handelsman, J.1
Cantor, N.2
Carnes, M.3
Denton, D.4
Fine, E.5
-
26
-
-
21244494060
-
Questionnaires in ecology: A review of past use and recommendations for best practice
-
White PCL, Vaughn Jennings N, Renwick AR, Barker NHL (2005) Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. J Appl Ecol 42: 421-430.
-
(2005)
J Appl Ecol
, vol.42
, pp. 421-430
-
-
White, P.C.L.1
Vaughn Jennings, N.2
Renwick, A.R.3
Barker, N.H.L.4
-
27
-
-
0029863225
-
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
-
Frank E (1996) Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal. Prev Med 25: 102-104.
-
(1996)
Prev Med
, vol.25
, pp. 102-104
-
-
Frank, E.1
|