Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists

BioScience

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 234-239

  Cassey, Phillip ^a   Blackburn, Tim M ^b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ecologists; Publication success; Questionnaire; Rejection rate; Survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542318329     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0234:PARASE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Bonnet X, Shine R, Lourdais O. 2002. Taxonomic chauvinism. Trends in Ecol-ogy and Evolution 17: 1-2.
2. Cassey P, Blackburn TM. 2003. Publication rejection among ecologists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 375-376.
3. Cole S, Cole JR, Simon GA. 1981. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214: 881-886.
4. Gura T. 2002. Peer review, unmasked. Nature 416: 258-260.
5. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1990. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. [NSF] National Science Foundation. 1999. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 1998. Arlington (VA): NSF.
7. Pannell DJ. 2002. Prose, psychopaths and persistence: Personal perspectives on publishing. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50: 101-116.
8. Tregenza T. 2002. Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 349-350.
9. Wennarås C, Wold A. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387: 341-343.
10. _. 2000. A chair of one's own. Nature 408: 647.
11. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.