Vibration effects on dissolution tests with USP apparatuses 1 and 2

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 3335-3343

  Gao, Zongming ^a   Moore, Terry W ^a   Doub, William H ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Disintegrating tablet; Dissolution testing; Nondisintegrating tablet; USP Apparatus 1; USP Apparatus 2; Vibration effect

Indexed keywords

PREDNISONE; SALICYLIC ACID;

ARTICLE; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG SOLUBILITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; LABORATORY APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; QUALITY CONTROL; TABLET DISINTEGRATION; VIBRATION;

EID: 52449103200     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: 15206017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21242     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dressman J, Kramer J. 2005. Pharmaceutical dissolution testing. Boca Raton, London, New York, Singapore: Taylor & Francis.
2. Cohen JL, Hubert BB, Leeson LJ, Rhodes CT, Robinson JR, Roseman TJ, Shefter E. 1990. The development of USP dissolution and drug release standards. Pharm Res 7:983-987.
3. Cox DC, Furman WB, Thornton LK, Moore TW, Jefferson EH. 1983. Systematic error associated with Apparatus 2 of the USP dissolution test III: Limitations of calibrators and the USP suitability test. J Pharm Sci 72:910-913.
4. Hamilton JF, Moore TW, Kerner CM. 1995. Repro-ducibility of dissolution test results. Pharmacopeial Forum 21:1383-1386.
5. Qureshi SA, Shabnam J. 2003. Applications of a new device (spindle) for improved characterization of drug release (dissolution) of pharmaceutical products. Eur J Pharm Sci 19:291-297.
6. Qureshi SA, Shabnam J. 2000. Cause of high variability in drug dissolution testing and its impact on setting tolerances. Eur J Pharm Sci 12:271-276.
7. Mirza T, Joshi Y, Liu Q, Vivilecchia R. 2005. Evaluation of dissolution hydrodynamics in the USP, PEAK and Flat-bottom vessels using different solubility drugs. Dissolut Technol 12:11-16.
8. Kamba M, Seta Y, Takeda N, Hamaura T, Kusai A, Nakane H, Nishimura K. 2003. Measurement of agitation force in dissolution test and mechanical destructive force in disintegration test. Int J Pharm 250:99-109.
9. Baxter JL, Muzzio FJ, Kukura J. 2004. Shear distribution and variability in the USP Apparatus 2 under turbulent conditions. Int J Pharm 279:9-17.
10. McCarthy LG, Kosiol C, Healy AM, Bradley G, Sexton JC, Corrigan OI. 2003. Simulating the hydro-dynamic conditions in the USP paddle dissolution apparatus. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 4:22.
11. Healy AM, McCarthy LG, Gallagher KM, Corrigan OI. 2002. Sensitivity of dissolution rate to location in the paddle dissolution apparatus. J Pharm Pharmacol 54:441-444.
12. Baxter JL, Kukura J, Muzzio FJ. 2005. Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP apparatus II. Int J Pharm 292:17-28.
13. Subcommittee on dissolution calibration. 2000. PhRMA. Dissolution calibration: Recommendations for reduced chemical testing and enhanced mechanical calibration. Pharmacopeial Forum 26: 1149-1166.
14. USP 27. 2004. Physical tests, <711> dissolution, "Dissolution Medium", footnote 3, 2304.
15. Hanson WA. Effects of vibration on dissolution rates I. Preliminary studies, presented at Beckman conference on dissolution techniques, Mountain-side, NJ, October 14, 1975.
16. Collins CC. 1998. Vibration: What is it and how might it affect dissolution testing? Dissolut Technol 5:16-18.
17. Kaniwa N, Katori N, Aoyagi N, Ishigame N, Seta Y, Shinba T, Fujiwara K, Nakai T, Oda Y, Kojima S. 1998. Collaborative study on the development of a standard for evaluation of vibration levels for dissolution apparatus. Int J Pharm 175:119-129.
18. Crist B, Spisak D. 2005. Evaluation of induced variance of physical parameters on the calibrated USP dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2. Dissolut Technol 2:28-31.
19. Gao Z, Moore TW, Doub WH, Westenberger BJ, Buhse LF. 2006. Effects of deaeration methods on dissolution testing in aqueous media: A study using a total dissolved gas pressure meter. J Pharm Sci 92:1606-1613.
20. Moore TW, Shangraw RF, Habib Y. 1996. Dissolution calibrator tablets: A recommendation for new calibrator tablets to replace both current USP calibrator tablets. Pharmacopeial Forum 22:2423-2428.
21. Moore JW, Flanner HH. 1996. Mathematical comparison of curves with an emphasis on in vitro dissolution profiles. Pharm Tech 20:64-74.
22. Shah VP, Tsong Y, Sathe P, Williams RL. 1999. Dissolution profile comparison using similarity factor, f2. Dissolut Technol 6:21.