Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP apparatus II dissolution test

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Volumn 292, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 17-28

  Baxter, Jennifer L ^a   Kukura, Joseph ^a   Muzzio, Fernando J ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Dissolution testing; Hydrodynamics; Shear; USP apparatus II

Indexed keywords

NAPROXEN; PREDNISONE; SALICYLIC ACID;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALIBRATOR; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TABLET;

EID: 13844276813     PISSN: 03785173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bardina, J.E., Huang, P.G., Coakley, T.J., 1997. Turbulence Modeling, Validation, Testing and Development. NASA Technical Memorandum.
2. L.M. Bocanegra, G.J. Morris, J.T. Jurewicz, and J.W. Mauger Fluid and particle laser doppler velocity measurements and mass transfer predictions for USP paddle method dissolution apparatus Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 16 1990 1441
3. D.C. Cox, and W.B. Furman Systematic error associated with apparatus 2 of the USP dissolution test I: effects of physical alignment of the dissolution apparatus J. Pharm. Sci. 71 1982 451
4. FDC Reports, 2001. Recalls Prompted By FDA on the Increase. The Gold Sheet 35, 1.
5. FDC Reports, 2002. Counterfeits Pose Special Recall Challenge. The Gold Sheet 36, 1.
6. FDC Reports, 2003. Spike in Potency-Related Problems Contributes to Overall Rise in 2002 Recalls. The Gold Sheet 37, 1.
7. W.E. Hamlin, E. Nelson, B.E. Ballard, and J.G. Wagner Loss of sensitivity in distinguishing real differences in dissolution rates due to increasing intensity of agitation J. Pharm. Sci. 51 1962 432
8. A.M. Healy, L.G. McCarthy, K.M. Gallagher, and O.I. Corrigan Sensitivity of dissolution rate to location in the paddle dissolution apparatus J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 54 2002 441
9. Johnson, K., Bittorf, K.J., 2002. Validating the Galerkin least-squares finite element methods in predicting mixing flows in stirred tank reactors, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Windsor, Ont., p. 490.
10. M. Kamba, Y. Seta, N. Takeda, T. Hamaura, A. Kusai, H. Nakane, and K. Nishimura Measurement of agitation force in dissolution test and mechanical destructive force in disintegration test Int. J. Pharm. 250 2003 99
11. Kresta, S.M., Brodkey, R.S., 2004. Turbulence in mixing applications. In: Paul, E.L., Atiemo-Obeng, V.A., KrestaHoboken, S.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Mixing: Science and Practice.
12. J. Kukura, E. Szalai, P. Arratia, and F. Muzzio Understanding pharmaceutical flows Pharm. Technol. 26 2002 48
13. J. Kukura, P.C. Arratia, E.S. Szalai, and F.J. Muzzio Engineering tools for understanding hydrodynamics of dissolution tests Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 29 2003 231
14. G. Levy Effect of certain tablet formulation factors on dissolution rate of the active ingredient J. Pharm. Sci. 52 1963 1039
15. G. Levy, J.R. Leonards, and J.A. Procknal Development of in vitro dissolution tests which correlate quantitatively with dissolution rate-limited drug absorption in man J. Pharm. Sci. 54 1965 1719
16. J.W. Mauger Physicochemical and fluid mechanical factors related to dissolution testing Diss. Tech. 3 1996 7
17. J.W. Mauger, R. Brockson, S. De, V.A. Gray, and D. Robinson Intrinsic dissolution performance of USP apparatus 2 using modified salicylic acid calibrator tablets: proof of principle Diss. Tech. 10 2003 6
18. J.W. Moore, and H.H. Flanner Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles Pharm. Technol. 20 1996 64
19. T.W. Moore, J.F. Hamilton, and C.M. Kerner Dissolution testing: limitations of the USP prednisone and salicylic acid calibrator tablets Pharm. Forum 21 1995 1387
20. S.A. Qureshi, and J. Shabnam Cause of high variability in drug dissolution testing and its impact on setting tolerances Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 12 2001 271
21. V.P. Shah, Y. Tsong, P. Sathe, and R.L. Williams Dissolution profile comparison using similarity factor, f2 Diss. Tech. 6 1999 21
22. U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, 2000. USP XXIV Rockville, MD, p. 1941.
23. F. Underwood, and D. Cadwallder Effects of various hydrodynamic conditions on dissolution rate determinations J. Pharm. Sci. 65 1976 697
24. N. Yuksel, A.E. Kanik, and T. Baykara Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and -independent methods Int. J. Pharm. 209 2000 57
25. Zalc, J.M., 2000. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Tools for Investigating Flow and Mixing in Industrial Systems: The Koch-Glitsch SMX Static Mixer and a Three Rushton Turbine Stirred Tank. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
26. J.M. Zalc, M.M. Alvarez, and F.J. Muzzio Extensive validation of computed laminar flow in a stirred tank with three Rushton turbines AIChE J. 47 2001 2144