Deliberation, learning, and institutional change: The evolution of institutions in judicial settings

Constitutional Political Economy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 180-202

  Blomquist, William ^a   Ostrom, Elinor ^b,c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Courts; Equity; Institutional analysis; Institutional evolution; Water resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 52249124490     PISSN: 10434062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10602-008-9045-5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. J. M. Anderies M. Janssen E. Ostrom 2004 A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective Ecology and Society 9 1 18
2. Arizona Department of Water Resources (2001) "Arizona's water supplies and water demands". http://www.azwater.gov/dwr/content/ publications/files/supplydemand.pdf.
3. Blomquist, W. (1992). Dividing the waters: Governing groundwater in southern California. San Francisco: ICS Press.
4. Blomquist, W., Schlager, E., & Heikkila, T. (2004). Common waters, diverging streams: Linking institutions and water management in Arizona, California, and Colorado. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5. J Carter 1959 Judicial control of the case and the limitations of discovery Federal Rules Decisions 23 406
6. Checchio, E. (1988). Water farming: The promise and problems of water transfers in arizona. Water Resources Research Center Issue Paper No. 4. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center.
7. Commonwealth of Australia. (2000). Water act 2000. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
8. L. DeAlessi R. J. Staaf 1991 The common law process: Efficiency or order? Constitutional Political Economy 2 107 112
9. R. Evans M. Joas S. Sundback K. Theopold 2006 Governing local sustainability Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49 849 867
10. M. R. Gallogly 2007 Arizona Water Law Newsletter 40 1 4 5
11. R. Glennon 2005 Water scarcity, marketing, and privatization Texas Law Review 83 7 1 29
12. Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Hundley, N. (2001). The great thirst: Californians and water, a history. revised edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Kahrl, W. (1982). Water and power: The conflict over Los Angeles' water supply in the owens valley. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15. J. Knight J. Johnson 2007 The priority of democracy: A pragmatist approach to political-economic institutions and the burden of justification American Political Science Review 101 1 47 61
16. J. D. Leshy J. Belanger 1988 Arizona law: Where ground and surface water meet Arizona State Law Journal 20 3 657 748
17. Libecap, G. D. (2007). Owens valley revisited. A reassessment of the West's first great water transfer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Mann, D. (1963). The politics of water in Arizona. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
19. J. [tmp] McKay 2005 Water institutional reforms in Australia Water Policy 7 35 52
20. National Land and Water Resources Audit (NLWRA) (2001). Australian water resources assessment 2000. Surface water and groundwater-availability and quality. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia National Land and Water Resources Audit.
21. Ostrom, V. (1953). Water and politics. Los Angeles, CA: Haynes Foundation.
22. V. Ostrom 1962 The political economy of water development American Economic Review 52 2 450 458
23. Ostrom, V. (1964). Property, proprietorship and politics: Law and the structure of strategic opportunities in the California water industry. Published by Resources for the Future, Reprint no. 47, June 1964. Online: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/documents/dir0/00/00/01/23/dlc-00000123-00/vostr006. pdf [Last accessed April 25, 2007].
24. Ostrom, E. (1965). Public entrepreneurship: A case study in ground water management. Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles.
25. Ostrom, V. (1971). Institutional arrangements for water resource development: The choice of institutional arrangements for water resource development, with special reference to the California water industry. Arlington, VA: National Water Commission.
26. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. E. Ostrom 2007 A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 39 15181 15187
28. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1972). Legal and political conditions of water resource development. Land economics 48(1), 1-14. Reprinted in M. McGinnis (Ed.) (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis (pp. 42-59) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. R. J. Pierce Jr. 1999 Is standing law or politics? North Carolina Law Review 77 1741 1789
30. G. L. Priest 1977 The common law process and the selection of efficient rules Journal of Legal Studies 6 1 65 82
31. M. J. Roe 1996 Chaos and evolution in law and economics Harvard Law Review 109 3 641 668
32. P. H. Rubin 1977 Why is the common law efficient? Journal of Legal Studies 6 1 51 63
33. P. H. Rubin C. Curran J. F. Curran 2001 Litigation versus legislation: Forum shopping by rent seekers Public Choice 107 3-4 295 310
34. J. E. Stake 2005 Evolution of rules in a common law system: Differential litigation of the fee tail and other perpetuities Florida State Law Review 32 401 424
35. Steed, B., & Blomquist, W. (2006). Responses to ecological and human threats to a California water basin governance system. Presented at the 2006 meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences. Bloomington, Indiana, October 25-27, 2006.
36. T. Sterner 2006 Quick fixes for the environment: Part of the solution or part of the problem Environment 48 10 20 27
37. V. J. Vanberg 1989 Carl Menger's evolutionary and John R. Commons' collective action approach to institutions: A comparison Review of Political Economy 1 334 360
38. Vanberg, V. J. (1992). Innovation, cultural evolution, and economic growth. In U. Witt (Ed.), Explaining process and change: Approaches to evolutionary economics (pp. 105-121). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
39. Vanberg, V. J. (1994). Cultural evolution, collective learning, and constitutional design. In D. Reisman (Ed.), Economic thought and political theory (pp. 171-204). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. V. J. Vanberg 1997 Institutional evolution through purposeful selection: The Constitutional Economics Of John R. Commons Constitutional Political Economy 8 105 122
41. M. Vardon M. Lenzen S. Peevor M. Creaser 2007 Water accounting in Australia Ecological Economics 61 4 650 659
42. Yandle, T., & Dewees, C. M. (2003). Privatizing the commons ⋯ twelve years later: Fishers' experiences with New Zealand's market-based fisheries management. In N. Dolsak & E. Ostrom (Eds.), The commons in the new millennium. Boston: MIT Press.
43. L. Yankwich 1958 Crystallization of issues by pretrial: A judge's view Columbia Law Review 58 4 470 479
44. Young, M. D. (2005). Sharing water: Options for the use of shares as a means to define groundwater entitlements in the South East of South Australia. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Working Paper. www.csiro.au.