Common waters, diverging streams: Linking institutions and water management in Arizona, California, and Colorado

Common Waters, Diverging Streams: Linking Institutions and Water Management in Arizona, California, and Colorado

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-205

  Blomquist, William ^a   Schlager, Edella ^b   Heikkila, Tanya ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904827765     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331154     Document Type: Book

References (278)

1. Abbott, P.O. (1985) Description ofWater Systems Operations in the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado. Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4092. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.
2. Aiken, J. David (1999) Balancing Endangered Species Protection and Irrigation Water Rights: The Platte River Cooperative Agreement. Great Plains Natural Resources Journal 3: 19-158.
3. Anderson, Terry, Oscar Burt, and David Fractor (1983) Privatizing Groundwater Basins: A Model and Its Application. In Water Rights. Terry Anderson, ed. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 223-248.
4. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1999a) Phoenix Active Management Area Draft Third Management Plan: 2000-2010. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources.
5. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1999b) Tucson Active Management Area Draft Third Management Plan: 2000-2010. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources.
6. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1999c) Prescott Active Management Area Draft Third Management Plan: 2000-2010. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources.
7. Arizona Department of Water Resources (2001a) Inside AMAs. water.az.gov/azwaterinfo/insideAMAs
8. Arizona Department of Water Resources (2001b) Arizona's Water Supplies and Water Demands. water.az.gov/azwaterinfo/statewide/
9. Arizona Department of Water Resources (2001c) Semi-Annual Status Report of Permitted Facilities, June 30th 2001. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources.
10. Arizona Department of Water Resources (2003) Assured Water Supply Program Brochure. http://www.water.az.gov/watermanagement/Content/Forms/AWSBrochure.pdf (Accessed October 27, 2003).
11. Arizona Water Banking Authority (1998) Annual Plan of Operation. Phoenix, AZ: AWBA (January).
12. Arizona Water Banking Authority (1999) Annual Plan of Operation. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Water Banking Authority (January).
13. Arizona Water Banking Authority (2000) Annual Plan of Operation. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Water Banking Authority (January).
14. Arizona Water Banking Authority (2001) Annual Plan of Operation. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Water Banking Authority (January).
15. Arizona Water Banking Authority Study Commission (1998) Arizona Water Banking Authority Study Commission Final Report. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources (December).
16. Association of Ground Water Agencies (1998) Conjunctive Use Issue Paper. Prepared for the AGWA/MWD/NWRI Nominal Group Technique Workshop on Conjunctive Use. Pomona, CA (May).
17. Association of Ground Water Agencies (2000) Groundwater and Surface Water in California: A Guide to Conjunctive Use. Fountain Valley, CA: Association of Ground Water Agencies.
18. Atwater, Richard and William Blomquist (2002) Rates, Rights and Regional Planning in the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 38(5): 1195-1205.
19. Bachman, Steve, Carl Hauge,Kevin Neese, and Anthony Saracino (1997) California Groundwater Management. Sacramento, CA: Groundwater Resources Association of California.
20. Banks, Harvey O. (1953) Utilization of Underground Storage Reservoirs. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 118: 220-234.
21. Bates, Robert H. (1989) Beyond the Miracle of the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Bish, Robert (1977) Environmental Resource Management: Public or Private? In Managing the Commons. Garrett Hardin and John Baden, eds. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman, pp. 217-228.
23. Blomquist,William (1992) Dividing the Waters: Governing Groundwater in Southern California. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
24. Blomquist,William (1998) Water Security and Future Development in the San Juan Basin: The Role of the San Juan Basin Authority. Fountain Valley, CA: National Water Research Institute.
25. Bruggink, Thomas H. (1992) Third Party Effects of Groundwater Law in the United States. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51(2): 202-222.
26. Byers, Jack (2002) Drought Hits Colorado. StreamLines: Quarterly Newsletter of the Office of the State Engineer 16(2): 1-2.
27. California Department of Water Resources (1993) State Drought Water Bank Program Environmental Impact Report. Sacramento, CA; California Department of Water Resources (November).
28. California Department of Water Resources (1994) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-93. Executive Summary. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
29. California Department of Water Resources (1995) Management of the State Water Project. Bulletin 132-94. Sacramento, CA:California Department of Water Resources.
30. California Department of Water Resources (1998a) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-98. Executive Summary. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
31. California Department of Water Resources (1998b) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-98.Volume 1. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
32. California Water Resources Control Board (1994) The Water Right Process. Sacramento, CA: California Water Resources Control Board, 4 pp.
33. Central Arizona Water Conservation District (1999) Annual Report.
34. Central Arizona Water Conservation District (2001) Timeline. www.cap-az.com/about/history/timeline
35. Central Arizona Water Conservation District (2003a) Rates. www.cap-az.com/management/rates
36. Central Arizona Water Conservation District (2003b) CAGRD,Executive Summary.www.cap-az.com/ (Accessed October 28, 2003).
37. Checchio, E. (1988) Water Farming: The Promise and Problems ofWater Transfers in Arizona. Water Resources Research Center Issue Paper No. 4. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center.
38. CIC Research, Inc. (1999) The Economic Impact on San Diego County of Three Levels of Water Delivery: 80, 60 or 40 Percent Occurring for Two or Six Months. Phase II Executive Summary. Report to the San Diego County Water Authority (October), 14 pp.
39. Colby, Bonnie G. (1989) Estimating the Value ofWater in Alternative Uses.Natural Resources Journal 29(2): 511-527.
40. Colorado Department of Agriculture (2000) Colorado Agricultural Statistics, 2000 preliminary and 1999 revised. Lakewood, CO: Colorado Agriculture Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/co/
41. Colorado Division of Water Resources (2000a) Cumulative Yearly Statistics, Water Year 2000. Denver, CO: Colorado Division of Water Resources.
42. Colorado Division of Water Resources (2000b) Colorado Historic Average Annual Stream Flows. Denver, CO: Colorado Division of Water Resources.
43. Colorado Division of Water Resources (2000c) Transmountain Diversions: Office of the State Engineer. Denver, CO: Colorado Division of Water Resources.
44. Colorado Groundwater Commission (2001) Designated Basins and Groundwater Management Districts. http://www.water.state.co.us/cgwc
45. Colorado State Engineer's Office (1996) Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Diversion and Use of Tributary Groundwater in the Arkansas River Basin. Denver, CO: Colorado State Engineer's Office.
46. Colorado Stream Lines (2001a) Lower South Platte River Water User Activities. StreamLines: Quarterly Newsletter of the Office of the State Engineer. 15(2): 2.
47. Colorado Stream Lines (2001b) Arkansas River Water Banking Pilot Project. StreamLines: Quarterly Newsletter of the Office of the State Engineer. 15(2): 3.
48. Colorado Water Protective and Development Association (1998) Augmentation Plan. (mimeograph).
49. Commons, John R. (1968) Legal Foundations of Capitalism.Madison,WI:University ofWisconsin Press.
50. Conkling, Harold (1946) Utilization of Ground-Water Storage in Stream System Development. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 111: 275-354.
51. Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research and Other Efforts Relating to Endangered Species Habitats Along the Central Platte River, Nebraska (July 1997).
52. Cuzan, Alfred G. (1979) A Critique of Collectivist Water Resources Planning.Western Political Quarterly 32(3): 320-326.
53. Denver Water Board (2003) Who We Are. www.denverwater.org/whoweare/ (Accessed October 20, 2003).
54. DeYoung, Tim and Hank Jenkins-Smith (1989) Privatizing Water Management: The Hollow Promises of Private Markets. In Water and the Future of the Southwest. Zachary A. Smith, ed. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 213-231.
55. Fischer,Ward H. and Steven B. Ray (1978) A Guide to Colorado Water Law. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University/Colorado Water Resources Research Institute.
56. Fisher,Anthony,David Fullerton,Nile Hatch, and Peter Reinelt (1995) Alternatives for Managing Drought: A Comparative Cost Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(3): 304-320.
57. Fradkin, Philip (2003) Water Pact May Soon Evaporate. The Los Angeles Times (October 21).
58. Gardner, Roy, Michael R. Moore, and James M.Walker (1997) Governing a Groundwater Commons: A Strategic and Laboratory Analysis ofWestern Water Law. Economic Inquiry 35(2): 218-234.
59. Gelt, Joe, et al. (2001) Water in the Tucson Area: Seeking Sustainability.Water Resources Research Center, College of Agriculture, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
60. Glen Canyon Institute (2001) Facts About Reservoir Powell. www.glencanyon.org/background/factsdam.htm
61. Glennon, Robert J. and Thomas Maddock III (1994) In Search of Subflow: Arizona's Futile Effort to Separate Groundwater from Surface Water. Arizona Law Review 36(3): 567-610.
62. Governor's Water Management Commission (2001) Governor's Water Management Commission Final Report. Phoenix, AZ: State of Arizona.
63. Gregg, Frank, Stephen M. Born, William B. Lord, and Marvin Waterstone (1991) Institutional Response to a Changing Water Policy Environment. Final Report, U.S. Geological Survey Grant No. 14-08-0001-G1639. Tucson, AZ: Arizona Water Resources Research Center.
64. Hardin, Garrett (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
65. Hauge, Carl J. (1992) The Importance of Ground Water in California. In Changing Practices in Ground Water Management-The Pros and Cons of Regulation. Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Conference on Ground Water. Report No. 77. Riverside, CA: University of California Water Resources Center, pp. 15-30.
66. Hauge, Carl J. (1994) The Physical Dimensions of Sustainability. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 9-13.
67. Heikkila, Tanya (2001) Managing Common-Pool Resources in a Public Service Industry: The Case of Conjunctive Water Management. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Public Administration and Policy, University of Arizona.
68. Huffman, James L. (1986) Allocating Water to Instream Uses: Private Alternatives. In Water Resources Law: Proceedings of the National Symposium on Water Resources Law. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
69. Hundley,Norris, Jr. (2001) The Great Thirst: Californians and Water, A History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
70. Ingram, Helen M. and Cy Oggins (1992) The Public Trust Doctrine and Community Values in Water. Natural Resources Journal 32(3): 515-537.
71. Ingram,Helen M. et al. (1984) Guidelines for Improved Institutional Analysis in Water Resources Planning.Water Resources Research 20(3): 323-334.
72. Johnson, James W. and Margaret Gallogly (2001) Arizona and Nevada Sign Interstate Water Banking Agreement.Water Law Newsletter 34(3): 1+
73. Johnson, Kyle C. (1992) Letting the Free Market Distribute Environmental Resources. William and Mary Journal of Environmental Law 17(1): 79-102.
74. Kepler, Keith (2003) Second Year Drought Affects Arkansas River Basin Well Users. Stream-Lines: Quarterly Newsletter of the Office of the State Engineer 17(1): 2-4.
75. Kiser, Larry and Elinor Ostrom (1982) The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In Strategies of Political Inquiry. Elinor Ostrom, ed. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 179-222
76. Kondolf, G.Mathias (1994) Surface-Ground Water Interactions: Some Implications for Sustainability of Ground Water Resources. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 133-142.
77. Knapp,Keith C. and Lars J. Olson (1995) The Economics of Conjunctive Groundwater Management with Stochastic Surface Supplies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28(3): (May) 340-356.
78. Krane, Dale, Platon N. Rigos, and Melvin B. Hill, Jr. (2001) Home Rule in America: A Fifty-State Handbook.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
79. Krautkraemer, John (1992) Pros and Cons of Ground Water Regulation. In Changing Practices in Ground Water Management-The Pros and Cons of Regulation. Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Conference on Ground Water. Report No. 77. Riverside, CA: University of California Water Resources Center, pp. 151-153.
80. Leavenworth, Stuart (2003) Toxic Dilemma. The Sacramento Bee. (October 20).
81. Leshy, John D. and James Belanger (1988) Arizona Law:Where Ground and Surface Water Meet. Arizona State Law Journal. 20(3): 657-748.
82. Littleworth, Arthur L. and Eric L. Garner (1995) California Water. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
83. Livingston,Marie L. (1993) Designing Water Institutions: Market Failure and Institutional Response. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1227.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
84. Long's Peak Working Group on National Water Policy (1994) America's Waters: A New Era of Sustainability. Environmental Law 24(1): 125-144.
85. Lord, William B. (1984) Institutions and Technology: Keys to Better Water Management. Water Resources Bulletin 20(5): 651-656.
86. Lower Colorado River Multispecies Conservation Plan (2001) The Lower Colorado River Multi-species Conservation Program. www.lcrmscp.org/Description.html
87. MacDonnell, Lawrence (1988) Colorado's Law of "Underground Water:" A Look at the South Platte Basin and Beyond. University of Colorado Law Review 59( 3): 579-625.
88. Mann, Dean (1963) The Politics ofWater in Arizona. Tucson,AZ:University of Arizona Press.
89. Matthews, Christine A. (1991) Using Ground Water Basins as Storage Facilities in Southern California.Water Resources Bulletin 27(5): 841-847.
90. Megdal, Sharon (2002) The Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District-The Need for Some Fine Tuning. Arizona Water Resource 10(5): 11.
91. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (1996) Southern California's Integrated Water Resources Plan. Report No. 1107. Executive Summary. Los Angeles, CA:Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
92. Metzger, Philip C. (1988) Protecting Social Values in Western Water Transfers. American Water Works Association Journal 80(3): 58-65.
93. Mills,William R. Jr. (1994) Recharge with Recycled Water: A Global Perspective. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 31-34.
94. Morehouse, Barbara J. (2002) Integrating Climate into Water Policy. Southwest Hydrology 1(2): 16+
95. Morrison, Jason I., Sandra L. Postel, and Peter H. Gleick (1996) The Sustainable Use ofWater in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security.
96. National Research Council (1997) Valuing Ground Water: Economic Concepts and Approaches. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
97. National Research Council, Water Science and Technology Board (2001) Envisioning the Agenda for Water Resources Research in the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
98. National Water Research Institute (1998) Conjunctive Use Water Management Program. Workshop Report. Fountain Valley, CA: National Water Research Institute.
99. Natural Heritage Institute (1997) Feasibility Study of a Maximal Groundwater Banking Program for California.Working Draft. (May 8), 67 pp.
100. North, Douglass C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (2001) Colorado-Big Thompson Project. http://www.ncwcd.org/project&features/cbt_main.htm
102. Oakerson, Ronald (1999) Governing Local Public Economies. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
103. O'Connell,Maureen (2001a) Thousands Still Seek Payments. Arizona Daily Star (April 29), p. A6.
104. O'Connell,Maureen (2001b) CAP: Round Two. Arizona Daily Star (April 29), p. A1.
105. Oshio, Kazuto (1997) Who Pays and Who Benefits? Metropolitan Water Politics in Twentieth-Century Southern California. The Japanese Journal of American Studies 8: 63-89.
106. Ostrom, Elinor (1998) Reflections on the Commons. In Managing the Commons, 2nd edit. John A. Baden and Douglas S. Noonan, eds. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 95-116.
107. Ostrom, Elinor (1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Paddock,William (2003) 2003 Colorado Water Legislation.Water Law Newsletter 36(2): 8-9.
109. Paddock, William and Mary Mead Hammond (2002) Colorado: Instream Flow Rights. Water Law Newsletter 35(2): 7.
110. Perry, Tony (2003) Imperial Water Deal Completed. The Los Angeles Times (October 3).
111. Pianen, Eric (2002) Army Corps Tries to Solve Dispute Over Water Levels. The Washington Post (May 26).
112. Porter,Mary Jean (2001) Southern Colorado Water Bank Plan Draws Questions, Concerns. The Pueblo Chieftain (October 8), p. 1.
113. Postel, Sandra L., Jason I. Morrison, and Peter H. Gleick (1998) Allocating Fresh Water to Aquatic Ecosystems: The Case of the Colorado River Delta. Water International 23(3): 119-125.
114. Provencher, Bill (1993) A Private Property Rights Regime to Replenish a Groundwater Aquifer. Land Economics 69(4): 325-340.
115. Radosevich, G.E., K.C. Nobe, D. Allardice, and C. Kirkwood (1976) Evolution and Administration of Colorado Water Law: 1876-1976. Fort Collins, CO:Water Resources.
116. Reisner, Marc (1994) Deconstruction in the Arid West: Close of the Age of Dams. West-Northwest 1(1): 1-11.
117. Reisner,Marc and Sarah Bates, eds. (1990) Overtapped Oasis: Reform or Revolution for Western Water.Washington, DC: Island Press.
118. Robie, Ronald B. (2001) New Legislation Requires Consideration ofWater Supplies for New Developments.Water Law Newsletter 34(3): 6-7.
119. Rose, Carol (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
120. Rouse, Karen (2001) Cost of Water Rises as Aquifers Shrink. The Denver Post (June 24), p. A-01.
121. Runge, C.F. (1984) Institutions and the Freerider: The Assurance Problem in Collective Action. Journal of Politics 46(1): 154-181.
122. Salt River Project (1999) 1997-1998 Salt River Project Annual Report. Tempe, AZ: Salt River Project.
123. Salt River Project (2001) Water. www.srpnet.com/water/
124. Sax, Joseph L. (1994) Understanding Transfers: Community Rights and the Privatization of Water.West-Northwest 1(1): 13-16.
125. Schlager, Edella (1999) Colorado Water Law as Customary Law: The South Platte and Arkansas River Basins. Paper prepared for the Workshop on the Workshop II, Bloomington, Indiana, June 9-12, 1999.
126. Schlager, Edella and Elinor Ostrom (1992) Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: An Empirical Analysis Land Economics 68(3): 249-262.
127. Smith, Jerd (2002) A War About Water. Rocky Mountain News. (November 18), p. 4A.
128. Smith, Jerd (2003) Ruling, Law Will Allow Farms to Pump Water. Rocky Mountain News (May 1), p.10A.
129. Smith,Zachary B., ed. (1989) Water and the Future of the Southwest. Albuquerque,NM:University of New Mexico Press.
130. Solley, Wayne B, Robert R. Pierce, and Howard A. Perlman (1993) Estimated Water Use in the United States 1990. United States Geological Survey Circular 1081.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
131. Solley, Wayne B (1998) Estimated Water Use in the United States 1995. United States Geological Survey Circular 1200.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
132. Sophocleous, Mario (2000) From Safe Yield to Sustainable Development of Water Resources- the Kansas Experience. Journal of Hydrology 235: 27-43.
133. Supalla, Raymond, Bettina Klaus, Osei Yeboah, and Randall Bruins (2002) A Game Theory Approach to Deciding Who Will Supply Instream Flow Water. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38( 4): 959-966.
134. Tang, Shui Yan (1992) Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
135. Taugher, Mike (2002) Reservoir Expansion Study Unsettled. Contra Costa Times. (August 14).
136. Taugher, Mike (2003) Most Wanted: Delta Water. Contra Costa Times (September 30).
137. Thomas, R.O. (1955) General Aspects of Planned Ground-Water Utilization. Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers 81(Item 706). 11 pp.
138. Tobin, Mitch (2001a) Answers to Common Questions on CAP Water. Arizona Daily Star (May 3), p. A1.
139. Tobin, Mitch (2001b) Sales of Bottled Water Slower This Time Around. Arizona Daily Star (May 2), p. A1.
140. Todd, David Keith and Iris Priestaf (1997) Role of Conjunctive Use in Groundwater Management. Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association Conference, Symposium on Conjunctive Use of Water Resources: Aquifer Storage and Recovery. (October), pp. 139-145.
141. Tucson AMA Safe-Yield Task Force (2000) Financing Water Infrastructure. Draft Issue Outline, July 3. Tucson, AZ:Arizona Department ofWater Resources, Tucson Active Management Area.
142. U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1991) Coordinating Water Resources in the Federal System: The Groundwater-Surface Water Connection. Report No. A-118.Washington, DC: U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
143. U.S.Bureau of Reclamation (2000) Blanket Approval of Temporary Transfers and Exchanges of Project Water Between South of Delta CVP Contractors. Draft Environmental Assessment. (January) Fresno, CA: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region. 16 pp.
144. U.S. Census Bureau (2001) State and County Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov
145. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (1998) Farm Business Economic Report, 1997 (ECI-1998).
146. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2001) 1997 Census of Agriculture Highlights. www.nass.usda.gov/census/census97/highlights/ag-state.htm
147. Vranesh, George (1987) Colorado Water Law. 3 vols. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center.
148. Water Resources Research Center (1999) Water in the Tucson Area: Seeking Sustainability. Tucson, AZ:Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona.
149. Water Tech Online (2003) California Dam Decision Signals Major Water Policy Shift. Southwest Hydrology 2(5): 10.
150. Weissenstein, Michel (2000) Six Groups Protest Water Release Plan. Las Vegas Review- Journal (October 31).
151. Western Regional Climate Center (2001) Precipitation Maps of the Western U.S. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/pcpn/
152. Western States Water Council (Anthony G. Willardson, Principal Investigator) (1990) Groundwater Recharge Projects in the Western United States: Economic Efficiency, Financial Feasibility, and Legal/Institutional Issues. Report to the Bureau of Reclamation and the Department of the Interior.Midvale, UT:WSWC.
153. Wilkinson, Charles F. (1988) To Settle a New Land: An Historical Essay on Water Law and Policy in the American West and in Colorado. In Water and the American West: Essays in Honor of Raphael J. Moses. David H. Getches, ed. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center, pp. 1-17.
154. Woodhouse, Betsy (2002) Climatic Effects on Groundwater Conditions in the Southwest. Southwest Hydrology 1(2): 26+
155. Young, Oran R. (1982) Resource Regimes: Natural Resources and Social Institutions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
156. APS v. Long, 160 Ariz. 429, 773 P2d 988
157. Baldwin v. County of Tehama (1994).
158. County of Inyo v. Los Angeles Department ofWater and Power, 32 Cal.App. 3d 795 (1973).
159. Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors, 110 Cal.Rptr.2d 579 (Ct. App. 2001).
160. National Audubon Society v. Superior Court, 33 Cal.3d 419 (1983).
161. City of Thornton v. City of Fort Collins, 830 P.2d 915 (Colo. 1992).
162. Colorado River Water Conservation Board v. Colorado Water Conservation Board, 197 Colo. 469, 594 P.2d 570 (1979).
163. Concerning the Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Diversion and Use of Tributary Groundwater in the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado, Case No. 95CW211, District Court,Water Division 2.
164. In re Arkansas River, 195 Colo. 557, 581 P.2d 293, 1978.
165. In re the Proposed Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Diversion and Use of Tributary Ground Water in the S. Platte River Basin, No. 02-CW-108 D.C. Water Div. No.1. Colo. Dec. 23, 2002.
166. Empire Lodge Homeowners' Ass'n v.Moyer, 39 P.3d 1139 (Colo. 2001).
167. Fellhauer v. People, 167 Colo. 320, 447 P.2d 986 (1969).
168. Simpson v. Bijou Irrigation Co., 69 P.3d 50(Colo.2003).
169. Kansas v. Colorado, 514 U.S. 673 (1995).
170. Abbott, Carl, Stephen J. Leonard, and David McComb (1994) Colorado: A History of the Centennial State, 3rd edit. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.
171. Anderson, James W. (1989) Some Thoughts on Conjunctive Use of Ground Water in California. Western State University Law Review 16(2): 559-589.
172. Andrews, Barbara T. and Sally K. Fairfax (1984) Groundwater and Intergovernmental Relations in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California:What Are All These Cooks Doing to the Broth? University of Colorado Law Review 55(2): 145-271.
173. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1991) Second Management Plan: Tucson Active Management Area. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources.
174. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1996) Regional Recharge Committee: Technical Report. Tucson, AZ: ADWR Tucson Active Management Area.
175. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1997) Arizona Water Information: Statewide Surface Water Management. http://www.adwr.state.az.us/azwaterinfo/index.html
176. Arizona Department of Water Resources (1998) Sahuarita-Green Valley Area: Central Arizona Project Water Use Feasibility Analysis and Delivery System Optimization Study. Task 4 Technical Memorandum: Financial Feasibility Analysis. Tucson,AZ:Arizona Department ofWater Resources,Tucson Active Management Area.
177. Arizona Senate Staff (2001) Fact Sheet for S.C.M. 1002. http://www.azleg.state.az.us/legtext/45leg/1r/bills/scm1002o.htm
178. Arizona Water Banking Authority (1998) Facility Plan: Tucson Active Management Area. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Water Banking Authority (September).
179. Bates, Sarah, David Getches, Lawrence MacDonnell, and Charles Wilkinson (1993) Searching Out the Headwaters: Change and Rediscovery in Western Water Policy.Washington,DC: Island Press.
180. Birdlebough, Stephen C. and Alfred Wilkins (1971) Legal Aspects of Conjunctive Use in California. In California Water: A Study in Resource Management. David Seckler, ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 263-270.
181. Bittinger,Morton (1964) The Problem of Integrating Ground Water and Surface Water Use. Ground Water 2(3): 33-38.
182. Blomquist,William, Tanya Heikkila, and Edella Schlager (2001) Institutions and Conjunctive Water Management in Three Western States. Natural Resources Journal. 41(3):653-683.
183. Bookman-Edmonston Engineering, Inc. (1999) Drought Benefits of Southern California Ground Water Basins Within the Metropolitan Water District Service Area. Discussion paper prepared for the Association of Ground Water Agencies. Glendale, CA (November).
184. Born, Stephen, M. ed. (1989) Redefining National Water Policy: New Roles and Directions. Bethesda, MD: American Water Resources Association.
185. Bowles, Jennifer (2003) Fine Sought Against MWD. Riverside Press-Enterprise. (September 20).
186. Briggs, Philip C. (1983) Ground-Water Management in Arizona. Journal ofWater Resources Planning and Management 109(3): 195-202.
187. Brown, Linton A. (1994) Conjunctive Use: Problems and Advantages. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water. Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 25-30.
188. Burges, Stephen J. and Reza Marnoon (1975) A Systematic Examination of Issues in Conjunctive Use of Ground and Surface Waters. Water Resources Information System Technical Bulletin No. 7. Olympia,WA: State of Washington Department of Ecology.
189. California Department of Water Resources (1994a) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-93.Volume 1. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
190. California Department of Water Resources (1994b) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-93.Volume 2. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
191. California Department of Water Resources (1998) California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160-98. Volume 2. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.
192. California Department of Water Resources (2003) Draft California Water Plan Update. www.water.ca.gov/b160/Stakeholder_Briefing_Draft (Accessed October 7, 2003).
193. Case, Pamela J. and Gregory Alward (1997) Patterns of Demographic, Economic and Value Change in the Western United States: Implications for Water Use and Management. In Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. Springfield,VA:National Technical Information Service.
194. Challen, Ray (1995) Regulation, Imperfect Markets and Transaction Costs: The Elusive Quest for Efficiency in Water Allocation. In Handbook of Environmental Economics, D. Bromley, ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
195. Challen, Ray (2000) Institutions, Transaction Costs and Environmental Policy: Institutional Reform for Water Resources. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
196. CIC Research, Inc. (1999) The Economic Impact on San Diego County of Three Levels of Water Delivery: 80, 60, or 40 Percent Occurring for Two Months of Six Months. Phase II Executive Summary. Prepared for San Diego County Water Authority. (October 19), 14 pp.
197. Colorado Water Resources Research Institute (1991) Colorado Citizens Water Handbook- Colorado Water: The Next 100 Years. Information Series No. 67. Boulder, CO: Colorado State University.
198. Connal, Desmond D., Jr. (1982) A History of the Arizona Groundwater Management Act. Arizona State Law Journal 1982(2): 313-343.
199. Ditmer, Joanne (1997) Transferring Water Rights All Wet? The Denver Post (October 19), p. F-2.
200. Dycus, J. Stephen (1984) Development of a National Groundwater Protection Strategy. Boston College Envirnmental Affairs Law Review 11(2):211-271.
201. Dzurik, Andrew A. (1990) Water Resources Planning. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
202. Eden, Susanna (1990) Integrated Water Management in Arizona. Issue Paper Number Five. Tucson, AZ: Arizona Water Resources Research Center.
203. El-Ashry,Mohamed T. and Diana C. Gibbons (1986) Troubled Waters: New Policies for Managing Water in the American West.Washington, DC:World Resources Institute.
204. Environmental and Energy Study Institute (1993) New Policy Directions to Sustain the Nation's Water Resources.Washington, DC: Environmental and Energy Study Institute.
205. Farrow, Ross (2002) District Prepares for Recharge Project. Lodi News-Sentinel.
206. Farrow, Ross (2003) Kern County Knows Groundwater Banking. Lodi News-Sentinel. (July 14).
207. Florkowski, Joe (2003a) New Wells to Improve Water Quality. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (September 11).
208. Florkowski, Joe (2003b) Early Talks Held for Water Storage Plan. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. (October 6).
209. Fradkin, Philip (1981) A River No More: The Colorado River and the West. New York: Knopf.
210. Fram,Miranda S., Brian A. Bergamaschi,Kelly D. Goodwin, Roger Fujii, and Jordan F. Clark (2003) Processes Affecting the Trihalomethane Concentrations Associated with the Third Injection, Storage, and Recovery Test at Lancaster,Antelope Valley, California.Water Resources Investigations Report No. 034062. United States Geological Survey. water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri034062 (Accessed September 18, 2003).
211. Garner, Eric L. and Janice L. Weis (1991) Coping with Shortages: Managing Water in the 1990s and Beyond. Natural Resources and Environment 5(4): 26+
212. Garner, Eric L.,Michelle Ouelette, and Richard L. Sharff, Jr. (1994) Institutional Reforms in California Groundwater. Pacific Law Journal 25(3): 1021-1052.
213. Getches,David H. (1985) Controlling Groundwater Use and Quality: A Fragmented System. Natural Resources Lawyer 17(4):623-645.
214. Glaser, Harold T., Donald E. Evenson, and Mark J.Wildermuth (1997) Conjunctive Use of Groundwater and Imported Surface Waters in Southern California. In Conjunctive Use of Water Resources: Aquifer Storage and Recovery. American Water Resources Association (October), pp. 111-120.
215. Gleason, Victor E. (1976) Water Projects Go Underground. Ecology Law Quarterly 5(4): 625-668.
216. Gottleib, Robert and Margaret FitzSimmons (1991) Thirst for Growth: Water Agencies as Hidden Government in California. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
217. Grant, Douglas L. (1987) The Complexities ofManaging Hydrologically Connected Surface Water and Groundwater Under the Appropriation Doctrine. Land and Water Law Review 22(1): 63-95.
218. Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte. Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte River Basin, Inc. Brochure.
219. Harding, Sidney T. (1960) Water in California. Palo Alto, CA: N-P Publications.
220. Harrison, David L. and Gustave Sandstrom, Jr. (1971) The Groundwater-Surface Water Conflict and Recent Colorado Water Legislation.University of Colorado Law Review 43(1): 1-48.
221. Higbee, Don, Director of Lower Arkansas Water Management Association, interview in Lamar, Colorado, October 1998.
222. Howitt, Richard, Nancy Moore, and Rodney T. Smith (1992) A Retrospective on California's 1991 Emergency Drought Water Bank. Report prepared for the California Department of Water Resources. 76 pp.
223. Hundley,Norris, Jr. (1975) Water and the West. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
224. Jaquette, David L. (1978) Efficient Water Use in California: Conjunctive Management of Ground and Surface Reservoirs. Report R-2389-CSA/RF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
225. Johnson, Thelma A. and Helen J. Peters (1967) Regional Integration of Surface and Ground Water Resources. Presented at the Symposium of the International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Haifa, Israel.
226. Kahn, Jeffrey J. and Robert A. Longenbaugh (1986) The Colorado Experience in Resolving Surface-Ground Water Conflicts. In Water Resources Law: Proceedings of the National Symposium on Water Resources Law. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, pp. 76-83.
227. Kahrl,William L. (1982) Water and Power: The Conflict Over Los Angeles'Water Supply in the Owens Valley. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
228. Kennedy, David N. (1994) California's Ground Water: A Vital Resource. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water. Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA:University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 35-40.
229. King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
230. Knapp,Keith C. and Henry J.Vaux (1982) Barriers to Effective Ground-Water Management: The California Case. Ground Water 20(1): 61-66.
231. Loehman, Edna Tusak and Ariel Dinar (1995) Introduction. In Water Quantity/Quality Management and Conflict Resolution: Institutions, Processes, and Economic Analyses. Ariel Dinar and Edna Tusak Loehman, eds.Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. xxi-xxx.
232. Loehman, Edna Tusak and D.Marc Kilgour (1998) Introduction: Social Design for Environmental and Resource Management. In Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management. Edna Tusak Loehman and D. Marc Kilgour, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 1-25.
233. Mallery,Michael (1983) Groundwater: A Call for a Comprehensive Management Program Pacific Law Journal 14(4): 1279-1307.
234. McClurg, Sue (1996) Maximizing Groundwater Supplies.Western Water (May/June): 4-13.
235. McCoy, Patricia R. (2003) Idahoans Debate Merits of Threatened Water Suit (Boise, Idaho) Capital Press Agriculture Weekly (September 16).
236. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (1986) High-Flowing Colorado River Roars into the Record Books. MWD Focus 1986(4): 7.
237. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (1993) MWD, Semitropic Agree on Water Banking. MWD Focus 1993(2): 7.
238. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (1996a) Southern California's Integrated Water Resources Plan. Report No. 1107.Volume 1: The Long-Term Resources Plan. Los Angeles, CA:Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
239. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (1996b) Southern California's Integrated Water Resources Plan. Report No. 1107.Volume 2:Metropolitan's System Overview. Los Angeles, CA:Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
240. Metzler, Frank and Tom Carr (1998) CAP Supply for the 21st Century:Taking Our Droughts to the Bank. In Water at the Confluence of Science, Law, and Public Policy: Proceeding of the Eleventh Annual Symposium, Arizona Hydrological Society, September 24-26, Tucson, AZ.
241. Moore, Deborah and Zach Willey (1991) Water in the American West: Institutional Evolution and Environmental Restoration in the 21st Century. University of Colorado Law Review 62(4): 775-825.
242. National Groundwater Policy Forum (1986) Groundwater: Saving the Unseen Resource. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
243. National Water Commission (1973) Water Policies for the Future: Final Report to the President and to the Congress of the United States. Port Washington, NY: Water Information Center, Inc.
244. Noel, J.E., B. Delworth Gardner, and Charles V.Moore (1980) Optimal Regional Conjunctive Water Management. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3): 489-498.
245. Ostrom, Elinor (1986) An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. Public Choice 48: 3-25.
246. Ostrom, Elinor (1998) The Institutional Analysis and Design Approach. In Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management. Edna Tusak Loehman and D. Marc Kilgour, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 68-90.
247. Ostrom, Elinor (1999) Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Theories of the Policy Process. Paul Sabatier, ed. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
248. Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
249. Ostrom, Vincent (1953) Water and Politics: A Study of Water Policies and Administration in the Development of Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA: Haynes Foundation.
250. Pielke, Roger A. Sr.,Nolan J. Doesken, and Jose D. Salas (2001) Drought Threat to Colorado Water. Colorado Water: Newsletter of the Water Center at Colorado State University 18(4): 7-11.
251. Reiter, Stanley (1998) On Coordination, Externalities, and Organization. In Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management. Edna Tusak Loehman and D.Marc Kilgour, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 57-67.
252. Ruttan,Vernon W. (1998) Designing Institutions for Sustainability. In Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management. Edna Tusak Loehman and D.Marc Kilgour, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 142-161.
253. Sample, Kathy, Bijou Irrigation Company, interview in Fort Morgan, Colorado, October 1998.
254. Santa Fe New Mexican (2002) County to Take Close Look at Injection Idea. The Santa Fe New Mexican (August 4).
255. Schneider, Anne J. (1994) Are Our Ground Water Laws Adequate? Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 47-54.
256. Sherow, James E. (1989) The Chimerical Vision:Michael Creed Hinderlider and Progressive Engineering in Colorado. Essays in Colorado History No. 9: 37-59.
257. Silvo, Andrew (2002) County to Consider Aquifer Protection. San Bernardino County Sun (October 9).
258. Smith, Zachary A. (1984) Rewriting California Groundwater Law: Past Attempts and Prerequisites to Reform. California Western Law Review 20(2): 223-257.
259. Smith, Zachary A. (1989) Groundwater in the West. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
260. Soltis, Dan (1997) Aquifer Recharge Experiment Termed "Proven Success."Water Engineering & Management 141(8): 8.
261. Southwest Hydrology (2003) Nevada Requests More Water. Southwest Hydrology 2(5): 11.
262. Sullivan, Jim (1998) Water for All: Planning for Region a Challenge. The Denver Post (January 18), p. E-1.
263. Sutherland, P. Lorenz and John A.Knapp (1988) The Impacts of Limited Water: A Colorado Case Study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(4): 294-298.
264. Tarlock, A. Dan, James Corbridge, and David Getches (1993) Water Resource Management: A Casebook in Law and Public Policy, 4th edit.Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press.
265. Taylor,Michael and Sara Singleton (1993) The Communal Resource: Transaction Costs and the Solution of Collective Action Problems. Politics and Society 21(2):195-214.
266. Tellman, Barbara (1996) Why Has Integrated Management Succeeded in Some States But Not in Others? Water Resources Update No. 106: 13-18.
267. Thomas, Clive E., ed. (1991) Politics and Public Policy in the Contemporary American West. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
268. Thomas, Gregory A., David K. Fullerton, David R. Purkey, Lee Axelrod, Timothy Ramirez, and Marcus Moench (1997) Feasibility Study of a Maximal Groundwater Banking Program for California: A Working Draft. Unpublished manuscript, 67 pp.
269. Thomas, R.O. (1955) General Aspects of Planned Ground-Water Utilization. Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers Volume 81, Item 706, 11 pp.
270. Thorson, John E. (1994) Protecting Ground Water as Res Publica. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 1-7.
271. Thorson, Norman W. (1978) Storing Water Underground: What's the Aqui-fer? Nebraska Law Review 57(3): 581-632.
272. Trager, Susan M. (1988) Emerging Forums for Groundwater Dispute Resolution in Califor-nia: A Glimpse at the Second Generation of Groundwater Issues and How Agencies Work Towards Problem Resolution. Pacific Law Journal 20(1): 31-74.
273. Trager, Susan M. (1994) When Is a Law to Protect Water Quality or an Endangered Species Actually a Scheme of the Federal Government to Regulate Ground Water? Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water.Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA: University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 143-148.
274. Trelease, Frank J. (1982) Conjunctive Use of Groundwater and Surface Water. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Journal 27B: 1853+
275. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1997) Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research and Other Efforts Relating to Endangered Species Habitat Along the Central Platte River, Nebraska (July).
276. Veblen, Thomas T. and Diane C. Lorenz (1991) The Colorado Front Range: A Century of Ecological Change. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
277. Weatherford, Gary D. (1994) Institutional Dimensions of Sustainability. Proceedings, Nineteenth Biennial Conference on Ground Water. Water Resources Center Report No. 84. Davis, CA:University of California Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, pp. 17-23.
278. Williamson, Oliver (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.