A study of the modification of the speed and size of the cursor for simulating pseudo-haptic bumps and holes

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Lécuyer, Anatole ^a   Burkhardt, Jean Marie ^b   Tan, Chee Hian ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Bump; Control display ratio; Cursor; Hole; Pseudo haptic; Size; Speed; Texture

Indexed keywords

BUMP; COMPLEX INTERACTIONS; COMPUTER SCREENS; CONTROL/DISPLAY RATIO; CURSOR; DECISION PROCESS; HAPTIC DEVICES; HOLE; MOUSE CURSORS; MUTUAL REINFORCEMENT; PSEUDO-HAPTIC; SIZE; TEXTURE; TEXTURE SENSATIONS; VIDEOGAMES;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; FILMS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; REINFORCEMENT; TEXTURES; USER INTERFACES;

SPEED;

EID: 52249113327     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1402236.1402238     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AVANZINI, F., SERAFIN, S., AND ROCCHESSO, D. 2005. Interactive simulation of rigid body interaction with friction-induced sound generation, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, 13, 5.2, 1073-1081.
2. BASDOGAN, C., HO, C. H., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1997. A ray-based haptic rendering technique for displaying shape and texture of 3D objects in virtual environments. In Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC-Vol. 61. 77-84.
3. BEDERSON, B. B. 2000. Fisheye menus. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 217-226.
4. BORING, E. G. 1940. Size constancy and Emmert's Law. Amer. J. Psych. 53, 2, 293-295.
5. BURDEA, G. 1996. Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. Wiley, New York.
6. DOMINION, L., LÉCUYER, A., BURKHARDT, J. M., RICHARD, P., AND RICHIR, S. 2005. Influence of control/display ratio on perception of mass of manipulated objects in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Virtual Reality. 19-25.
7. EMMERT, E. 1881. Grössenverhältnisse der Nachbilder. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilk. 19, 443-450.
8. ERKELENS, C. J. AND REGAN, D. 1986. Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity. J. Physiol. 379, 145-169.
9. ERNST, M. O. AND BANKS, M. S. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429-433.
10. GESCHEIDER, G. A. 1985. Psychophysics Method, Theory, and Application. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Mahwah, New Jersey.
11. HAPTION. 2005. VIRTUOSE API V2.0 Programming Manual, www.haption.com
12. HATWELL, Y., STRERI, A., AND GENTAZ, E. 2003. Touching for Knowing. Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA.
13. HERSHENSON, M. 1999. Visual Space Perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. IKEI, Y., WAKAMATSU, K., AND FUKUDA, S. 1997. Vibratoiy tactile display of image-based textures. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 17, 6, 53-61.
15. JONES, L. A. AND BERRIS, M. 2002. The psychophysics of temperature perception and thermal-interface design. In Proceedings of Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 137-142.
16. LÉCUYER, A., COQUILLART, S., KHEDDAR, A., RICHARD, P., AND COIFFET, P. 2000. Pseudo-haptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Virtual Reality. 239-246.
17. LÉCUYER, A., BURKHARDT, J. M., COQUILLART, S., AND COIFFET, P. 2001. Boundary of illusion: An experiment of sensory integration with a pseudo-haptic system. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Virtual Reality.
18. LÉCUYER, A., BURKHARDT, J. M., AND ETIENNE L. 2004. Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: The perception of pseudo-haptic textures. In Proceedings of ACM Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems.
19. LEDERMAN, S. J. AND ABBOTT, S. G. 1981. Texture perception: Studies of intersensory organisation using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Perception Perform. 7, 4, 902-915.
20. LIPPINCOTT-WILLIAMS AND WILKINS. 2005. Peripheral Nerve Blocks on DVD: Upper Limbs. ISBN: 0-7817-4337-0, http://www.lww.com.
21. MANDRYK, R. L., RODGERS, M. E., AND INKPEN, K. M. 2005. Sticky widgets: Pseudo-haptic widget enhancements for multi-monitor displays. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1621-1624.
22. MINSKY, M. D. R. 1995. Computational Haptics: The Sandpaper System for Synthesizing Texture with a Force-Feedback Haptic Display. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.
23. NAKAMIZO, S. AND IMAMURA, M. 2004. Verification of Emmert's Law in Actual and Virtual Environments. J. Physiol. Anthropol. Appl. Human Sci. 23, 325-329.
24. PALJIC, A., BURKHARDT, J. M., AND COQUILLART, S. 2004. Evaluation of pseudo-haptic feedback for simulating torque: A comparison between isometric and elastic input devices. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 216-223.
25. ROBLES-DE-LA-TORRE, G. AND HAYWARD, V. 2001. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412, 445-448.
26. RODGERS, M. 2005. Smart Sticky Widgets: A Pseudo-Haptic Approach for Multi-Monitor Display, PhD Thesis, Dalhousie University (Aug. 16).
27. SHIMOJO, M., SHINOARA, M., AND FUKUI, Y. 1999. Human shape recognition performance for 3D tactile display. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybern. A 29, 6, 637-644.
28. VAN MENSVOORT, K. 2002. What you see is what you feel: Exploiting the dominance of the visual over the haptic domain to simulate force-feedback with cursor displacements. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 345-348.
29. WATANABE, K. AND YASUMURA, M. 2003. Realizable user interface: The information realization by using cursor. In Proceedings of Human Interface Symposium. 541-544.
30. YOUNG, F. A. 1951. Concerning Emmert's Law. Amer. J. Psychol. 64, 127-128.