The flux-summation theorem and the 'evolution of dominance'

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 254, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 821-825

  Agutter, Paul S ^a  

^a Theoretical and Cell Biology Consultancy   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Control coefficient; Dominance; Flux summation theorem; Metabolic control analysis; Modifier genes; Phenotypic robustness

Indexed keywords

ENZYME;

DOMINANCE; ENZYME; EVOLUTION; FLUX MEASUREMENT; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE;

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVOLUTION; FLUX SUMMATION THEROREM; METABOLIC REGULATION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL RATE;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, DOMINANT; HOMEOSTASIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 52149093002     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agutter P.S., and Wheatley D.N. About Life (2007), Springer, Dordrecht (Chapter 10)
2. Atkinson D.E. Regulation of enzyme function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 23 (1969) 47-68
3. Bagheri H.C., and Wagner G.P. Evolution of dominance in metabolic pathways. Genetics 168 (2004) 1713-1735
4. Bagheri-Chaichian H., Hermisson J., Vaisnys J.R., and Wagner G.P. Effects of epistasis on phenotypic robustness in metabolic pathways. Math. Biosci. 184 (2003) 27-51
5. Bourguet D. The evolution of dominance. Heredity 83 (1999) 1-4
6. Chen B.S., Wang Y.C., Wu W.S., and Li W.H. A new measure of the robustness of biochemical networks. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 1705-2698
7. Cornish-Bowden A. Dominance is not inevitable. J. Theor. Biol. 125 (1987) 333-338
8. Cornish-Bowden A., and Nanjundiah V. The basis of dominance. In: Vieta R.A. (Ed). The Biology of Genetic Dominance, Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit (2006), Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX 1-16
9. Fajans S.S. Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Diabetes Metab. Rev. 5 (1989) 579-606
10. Fell D.A. Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem. J. 286 (1992) 313-330
11. Fisher R.A. The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Am. Nat. 62 (1928) 113-126
12. Grossniklaus U., Madhusudhan M.S., and Nanjundiah V. Nonlinear enzyme kinetics can lead to high metabolic flux control coefficients: implications for the evolution of dominance. J. Theor. Biol. 182 (1996) 299-302
13. Haldane J.B.S. The Causes of Evolution (1932), Princeton Science Library, Princeton, NJ
14. Heinrich R., and Rapoport T.A. Linear theory of enzymatic chains; its application for the analysis of the cross-over theorem and the glycolysis of human erythrocytes. Acta Biol. Med. Germanica 341 (1973) 479-494
15. Jacobsen E.W., and Cedersund G. Structural robustness of biochemical network models-with application to the oscillatory metabolism of activated neutrophils. IET Syst. Biol. 2 (2008) 39-47
16. Kacser H. The control of enzyme systems in vivo: elasticity analysis of the steady state. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11 (1983) 35-40
17. Kacser H., and Burns J.A. The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27 (1973) 65-104
18. Kacser H., and Burns J.A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97 (1981) 639-666
19. Kauffman S.A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22 (1969) 437-467
20. Kim J., Bates D.G., Postlethwaite I., Ma L., and Iglesias P.A. Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. Syst. Biol. 153 (2006) 96-104
21. Mazat J.-P., Reder C., and Letellier T. Why are most flux control coefficients so small?. J. Theor. Biol. 182 (1996) 253-258
22. Mendel, J., 1865. Experiments in plant hybridization. 〈http://www.mendelweb.org/Mendel.html〉 (accessed 12 May 2008).
23. Morgan T.H., Sturtevant A.H., Muller H.J., and Bridges C.B. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915), Holt, New York
24. Muller H. Evidence on the precision of genetic adaptation. Harvey Lect. 43 (1948) 165-229
25. Newman S.A., and Rice S.A. Model for constraint and control in biochemical networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68 (1971) 92-96
26. Orr H.A. A test of Fisher's theory of dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 11,413-11,415
27. Porteous J.W. A rational treatment of Mendelian genetics. Theor. Biol. Med. Mod. 1 (2004) 6
28. Reder C. Metabolic control theory: a structural approach. J. Theor. Biol. 135 (1988) 175-201
29. Schuster S. Control analysis in terms of generalized variables characterizing metabolic systems. J. Theor. Biol. 182 (1996) 259-268
30. Sorribas A., Hernndez-Bermejo B., Vilaprinyo E., and Alves R. Cooperativity and saturation in biochemical networks: a saturable formalism using Taylor series approximations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97 (2007) 1259-1277
31. Stearns S. Issues in evolutionary medicine. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 17 (2005) 131-140
32. Veitia R.A. Nonlinear effects in macromolecular assembly and dosage sensitivity. J. Theor. Biol. 220 (2003) 19-25
33. Veitia R.A. The Biology of Genetic Dominance. (Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit) (2006), Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX
34. Wright S. Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am. Nat. 63 (1934) 25-53