A framework for process-solution analysis in collaborative learning environments

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 812-832

  Bravo, Crescencio ^a   Redondo, Miguel A ^a   Verdejo, M Felisa ^b   Ortega, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collaboration and interaction analysis; CSCL; Solution analysis; User and group modelling

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; LIFE CYCLE; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COLLABORATION AND INTERACTION ANALYSIS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CSCL; INTERVENTION ANALYSIS; SOLUTION ANALYSIS; USER AND GROUP MODELLING;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 52149088327     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arnseth, H.C., Ludvigsen, S., Wasson, B., Mørch, A., 2001. Collaboration and problem solving in distributed collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2001 (Euro-CSCL'2001), Maastricht McLuhan Institutt, Maastricht, Netherlands, pp. 75-82.
2. Avouris, N.M., Dimitracopoulou, A., Komis, V., Fidas, C., 2002. OCAF: an object-oriented model of analysis of collaborative problem solving. In: Computer-Support Collaborative Learning (CSCL'2002), Boulder, CO, USA, pp. 92-101.
3. Avouris, N.M., Margaritis, M., Komis, V., 2004. Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: the synergo approach. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction (In ITS'2004), Maceio, Brazil, pp. 13-18.
4. Baker M., and Lund K. Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 3 13 (1997) 175-193
5. Barros B., and Verdejo M.F. Analysing student's interaction process for improving collaboration: the DEGREE approach. International Journal for Artificial Intelligence in Education 11 (2000) 221-241
6. Bravo C., Redondo M.A., Ortega M., and Verdejo M.F. Collaborative environments for the learning of design: a model and a case study in Domotics. Computers and Education 46 2 (2006) 152-173
7. Bravo C., Van Joolingen W., and De Jong T. Modeling and simulation in inquiry learning: checking solutions and giving intelligent advice. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation 82 11 (2006) 769-784
8. Bravo, C., Duque, R., Gallardo, J., García, P., García, P., 2007. A groupware system for distributed collaborative programming: usability issues and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Tool Support and Requirements Management in Distributed Projects (In REMIDI'07), Munich, Germany, pp. 50-56.
9. Constantino-González M.A., Suthers D.D., and Escamilla de los Santos J.G. Coaching web-based collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13 (2003) 263-299
10. Daradoumis T., Martínez-Monés A., and Xhafa F. A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 598-622
11. Dillenbourg P., Baker M., Blaye A., and O'Malley C. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: Espada E., and Reiman P. (Eds). Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science (1996), Elsevier, Oxford 189-211
12. Dimitrakopoulou, A., et al., 2004. State of the art on interaction analysis: interaction analysis indicators. In: Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Interaction & Collaboration Analysis' Supporting Teachers and Students' Self-Regulation. Jointly Executed Integrated Research Project, Deliverable D.26.1.
13. Dimitrakopoulou, A., et al., 2005. State of the art on interaction analysis for metacognitive support & diagnosis. In: Kaleidoscope Network of Excelence. Interaction Analysis: Supporting Participants in Technology-based Learning Activities. Jointly Executed Integrated Research Project, Deliverable D.31.1.
14. Duque R., and Bravo C. A method to classify the collaboration in CSCL systems. In: Beliczynski B. (Ed). Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms (LNCS) (2007), Springer, Berlin 649-656
15. Guba E.G., and Lincoln Y.S. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches (1981), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
16. Inaba, A., Tamura, T., Ohkubo, R., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R., Toyoda, J., 2001. Design and analysis of learners' interaction based on collaborative learning ontology. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2001 (Euro-CSCL'2001), Maastricht McLuhan Institutt, Maastricht, Netherlands, pp. 308-315.
17. Jermann, P., Soller, A., Mühlenbrock, M., 2001. From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2001 (Euro-CSCL'2001), Maastricht McLuhan Institutt, Maastricht, Netherlands, pp. 324-331.
18. Komis V., Avouris N.M., and Fidas C. Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: study of synchoronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies 7 2 (2002) 169-188
19. In: Koschmann T. (Ed). CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
20. Koschmann, T., 2001. Revisiting the paradigms of instructional technology. In: Kennedy, G., Keppell, M., McNaught, C., Petrovic, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, pp. 15-22.
21. Leeper M., Woolverton M., Mumme D., and Gurtner J. Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In: Lajoie S., and Derry S. (Eds). Computers as Cognitive Toolsale (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 75-105
22. Luff P., and Heath C. The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 4 (2000) 669-699
23. Macaulay C., Benyon D., and Crerar A. Ethnography, theory and systems design: from intuition to insight. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 1 (2000) 35-60
24. Martínez A., Dimitriadis Y., Rubia B., Gómez E., and de la Fuente P. Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers and Education 41 4 (2003) 353-368
25. Molina, A.I., Duque, R., Redondo, M.A., Bravo, C., Ortega, M., 2006. Applying machine learning techniques for the analysis of activities in CSCL environments based on argumentative discussion. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Computers in Education, León (Spain), pp. 214-221.
26. Mühlenbrock M. Action Based Collaboration Analysis for Group Learning, Dissertations in Artificial Intelligence (2001), IOS Press, Amsterdam
27. Mühlenbrock, M., Hoppe, U., 1999. Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL'1999). Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp. 398-405.
28. Mühlenbrock, M., Hoppe, U., 2001. A collaboration monitor for shared workspaces. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED-2001). IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 154-165.
29. Paolucci, M., Suthers, D.D., Weiner, A., 1996. Automated advice-giving strategies for scientific inquiry. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'1996), Montréal, Canada, pp. 372-381.
30. Siegel S., and Castellan N.J. Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (1988), McGraw-Hill, New York
31. In: Slavin R.E. (Ed). Collaborative Learning (1983), Longman, New York
32. Soller A. Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (1998) 40-62
33. Soller, A., Lesgold, A., 2000. Knowledge acquisition for adaptive collaborative learning environments. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium, Cape Cod, MA, USA.
34. Suraweera P., and Mitrovic A. KERMIT: a constraint-based tutor for database modeling. In: Cerri S.A., Gourdères G., and Paraguaçu F. (Eds). Intelligent Tutoring Systems (LNCS) (2002), Springer, Berlin 671-680
35. Tam J., and Greenberg S. A framework for asynchronous change awareness in collaborative documents and workspaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 583-635
36. Van Joolingen W.R. Designing for collaborative discovery learning. In: Gauthier G., Frasson C., and van Lehu K. (Eds). Intelligent Tutoring Systems (LNCS) (2000), Springer, Berlin 202-211
37. Walton D. The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. Synthese 123 (2000) 327-346