Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Treatment with Large Femoral Heads vs Constrained Liners

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 59-63

  Sikes, C Van ^a   Lai, Lawrence P ^a   Schreiber, Martin ^b   Mont, Michael A ^c   Jinnah, Riyaz H ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

constrained liner; hip dislocation; hip instability; large femoral head; metal on metal; revision hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYETHYLENE;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BRACE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 52049109253     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.032     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fricka K.B., Marshall A., and Paprosky W.G. Constrained liners in revision total hip arthroplasty: an overuse syndrome: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 21 4 Suppl 1 (2006) 121
2. Gjertsen J.E., Lie S.A., Fevang J.M., et al. Total hip replacement after femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: results of 8,577 fractures reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78 (2007) 491
3. Kung P.L., and Ries M.D. Effect of femoral head size and abductors on dislocation after revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465 (2007) 170
4. Kim Y., Morshed S., Joseph T., et al. Clinical impact of obesity on stability following revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 142
5. Mahomed N.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 27
6. Kim Y.S., Kwon S.Y., Sun D.H., et al. Modified posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty to enhance joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 (2008) 294
7. Malik A., Maheshwari A., and Dorr L.D. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 1832
8. Dorr L.D., and Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 144
9. Padgett D.E., and Warashina H. The unstable total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 72
10. Lachiewicz P.F., and Kelley S.S. The use of constrained components in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10 (2002) 233
11. Spitzer A.I. The S-ROM cementless femoral stem: history and literature review. Orthopedics 28 9 Suppl (2005) s1117
12. Goetz D.D., Bremner B.R., Callaghan J.J., et al. Salvage of a recurrently dislocating total hip prosthesis with use of a constrained acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 2419
13. Williams Jr. J.T., Ragland P.S., and Clarke S. Constrained components for the unstable hip following total hip arthroplasty: a literature review. Int Orthop 31 (2007) 273
14. Shapiro G.S., Weiland D.E., Markel D.C., et al. The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 250
15. Jones S.A., John A., Mahesen M., et al. Omnifit acetabular component: a solution to preventing and treating dislocation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15 (2007) 167
16. Su E.P., and Pellicci P.M. The role of constrained liners in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 122
17. Berend K.R., Lombardi Jr. A.V., Mallory T.H., et al. The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures. J Arthroplasty 20 7 Suppl 3 (2005) 93
18. Beaule P.E., Schmalzried T.P., Udomkiat P., et al. Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A (2002) 256
19. Affatato S., Leardini W., Jedenmalm A., et al. Larger diameter bearings reduce wear in metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456 (2007) 153
20. Hallab N.J., Caicedo M., Finnegan A., et al. Th1 type lymphocyte reactivity to metals in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 3 (2008) 6
21. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., and Beaule P.E. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 108
22. Peters C.L., McPherson E., Jackson J.D., et al. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 6 Suppl 2 (2007) 140
23. Hing C.B., Back D.L., Bailey M., et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 (2007) 1431
24. Smith T.M., Berend K.R., Lombardi Jr. A.V., et al. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 137
25. Tarasevicius S., Kesteris U., Robertsson O., et al. Femoral head diameter affects the revision rate in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 1,720 hip replacements with 9-21 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop 77 (2006) 706
26. Geller J.A., Malchau H., Bragdon C., et al. Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene: minimum 3-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447 (2006) 53