How reliable are harvesting data for analyses of spatio-temporal population dynamics?

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1461-1468

  Ranta, Esa ^a   Lindström, Jan ^c   Lindén, Harto ^a,b   Helle, Pekka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMEBIRD; HARVESTING; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION ESTIMATION; POPULATION MODELING; TIME SERIES;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

BONASA BONASIA; TETRAO TETRIX; TETRAONIDAE;

EID: 52049098677     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16879.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beddington, J. R. et al. 2007. Current problems in the management of marine fisheries Science 316 : 1713 1716.
2. Brittas, R. Karlbom, M. 1990. A field evaluation of the Finnish 3-man chain: a method for estimating forest grouse numbers and habitat use Ornis Fenn. 67 : 18 23.
3. Cattadori, I. M. et al. 2003. Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting Oikos 100 : 439 446.
4. Elton, C. S. Nicholson, M. 1942. The ten-year cycle in numbers of the lynx in Canada J. Anim. Ecol. 11 : 215 244.
5. Elzinga, C. et al. 2001. Monitoring plant and animal populations: a handbook for field biologists. Blackwell.
6. Helle, P. Lindström, J. 1991. Censusing tetraonids by the Finnish wildlife triangle method: principles and some applications Ornis Fenn. 68 : 148 157.
7. Haydon, D. T. et al. 2002. Analysing noisy time-series: describing regional variation in the cyclic dynamics of red grouse Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 1609 1617.
8. Hörnell-Willebrand, M. et al. 2006. Temporal and spatial correlation in chick production of willow grouse Lagopus lagopus in Sweden and Norway Wildlife Biol. 12 : 347 355.
9. Hudson, P. J. 1986. The biology and management of a wild game bird. The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge.
10. Hudson, P. J. 1992. Grouse in space and time. The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge.
11. Hudson, P. J. et al. 1992. Regulation and stability of a free-living host-parasite system: Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. I. Monitoring and parasite reduction experiments J. Anim. Ecol. 61 : 477 486.
12. Hudson, P. J. et al. 1999. Population cycles and parasitism Science 286 : 2425.
13. Jonzén, N. et al. 2003. Harvesting-induced population fluctuations? Wildlife Biol. 9 : 59 65.
14. Krebs, C. J. 2002. Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics.Soc Philos. Trans. R. Lond. B 357 : 1211 1219.
15. Kurki, S. et al. 2000. Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests Ecology 81 : 1985 1997.
16. Lambin, X. et al. 1999. Population cycles and parasitism Science 286 : 2425.
17. Lindén, H. 1981. Hunting and tetraonid populations in Finland Finn. Game Res. 39 : 69 78.
18. Lindén, H. 1991. Patterns of grouse shooting in Finland Ornis Scand. 22 : 241 244.
19. Lindén, H. Rajala, P. 1981. Fluctuations and long-term trends in the relative densities of tetraonid populations in Finland, 1964-77 Finn. Game Res. 39 : 13 34.
20. Lindén, H. et al. 1989. Tetraonid populations in Finland in 1988: a comparison between the route censuses and the wildlife triangles Suomen Riista 35 : 36 42 (in Finnish with English summary).
21. Lindén, H. Wikman, M. 1990. The prudent grouse predator; man compared to goshawk Proc. XVI Congr. Int. Union Game Biol., Vysoké Tatry, Strbské Pleso, CSSR 1983 : 959 965.
22. Lindén, H. et al. 1996. Wildlife triangle scheme in Finland: methods and aims for monitoring wildlife populations Finn. Game Res. 49 : 4 11.
23. Lindström, J. et al. 1995. The clockwork of Finnish tetraonid population dynamics Oikos 74 : 185 194.
24. Lindström, J. et al. 2001. From arctic lemmings to adaptive dynamics - Charles Elton's legacy in population ecology Biol. Rev. 76 : 129 158.
25. Ludwig, G. 2006. Mechanisms of population declines in boreal forest grouse PhD thesis. - Univ. of Jyväskylä, Finland.
26. Myers, R. A. et al. 1997. Why do fish stocks collapse? The example of cod in Atlantic Canada Ecol. Appl. 7 : 91 106.
27. Pitcher, T. J. et al. 1998K. Reinventing fisheries management. luver.
28. Rajala, P. 1974. The structure and reproduction of Finnish populations of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, on the basis of late summer census data Finn. Game Res. 35 : 1 51.
29. Ranta, E. et al. 1997. The spatial dimension of population fluctuations Science 278 : 1621 1623.
30. Ranta, E. et al. 2004. Forty years of grouse monitoring in Finland Suomen Riista 50 : 128 136. (in Finnish with English summary).
31. Ranta, E. et al. 2006. Ecology of populations. Cambridge Univ. Press.
32. Royama, T. 1992. Analytical population dynamics. Chapman and Hall.
33. Shaw, D. J. et al. 2004. The shape of red grouse cycles J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 767 776.
34. Siivonen, L. 1954. Some essential features of short-term population fluctuation J. Wildlife Manage. 18 : 38 45.
35. Southwood, T. R. E. Henderson, P. A. 2000. Ecological methods. Blackwell.
36. Sparholt, H. et al. 2007. A meta-analysis of ICES fish stocks during the past half century ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64 : 707 713.
37. Stenseth, N. C. et al. 1999. Common dynamic structure of Canada lynx populations within three climatic regions Science 285 : 1071 1073.
38. Sutherland, W. J. Ecological census techniques. Cambridge Univ. Press 2006.