Catching the 'Shanghai Spirit': How the shanghai cooperation organization promotes authoritarian norms in Central Asia

Europe - Asia Studies

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1321-1344

  Ambrosio, Thomas ^a  

^a North Dakota Slate University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITARIANISM; DEMOCRACY; DEMOCRATIZATION; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; POLITICAL POWER;

ASIA; CENTRAL ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; SHANGHAI;

EID: 52049096893     PISSN: 09668136     EISSN: 14653427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09668130802292143     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acharya, A. (2003) Democratisation and the Prospects for Participatory Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24:2, pp. 375-390.
2. Alamgir, J. (1997) Against the Current: The Survival of Authoritarianism in Burma. Pacific Affairs, 70:3, pp. 333-350.
3. Al-Qahtani, M. (2006) The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Law of International Organizations. Chinese Journal of International Law, 5:1, pp. 129-147.
4. Ambrosio, T. (2005) Challenging America's Global Preeminence: Russia's Quest for Multipolarity, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK
5. Ambrosio, T. (2006) The Political Success of Russia-Belarus Relations: Insulating Minsk from a "Color" Revolution. Demokratizatsiya, 14:3, pp. 407-434.
6. Ambrosio, T. Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the former Soviet Union, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK
7. Bert, W. (2004) Burma, China and the USA?. Pacific Affairs, 77:2, pp. 263-282.
8. Blank, S. (2004) Democratic Prospects in Central Asia. World Affairs, 166:3, pp. 133-147.
9. Brunell, P. (2006) Promoting Democracy Backwards. FRIDE (Fundacion para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Dialogo Exterior) Working Paper 28
10. Carothers, T. (2006) The Backlash Against Democracy Promotion. Foreign Affairs, 85:2, pp. 55-68.
11. Chung, C. (2006) China and the Institutionalization of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Problems of Post-Communism, 53:5, pp. 3-14.
12. Diamond, L. (2006) Authoritarian Learning: Lessons from the Colored Revolutions. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 12:2, pp. 215-222.
13. Dimitrova, A. and Pridham, G. (2004) International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and its Limits. Democratization, 11:5, pp. 91-112.
14. Economides, S. (2005) The Europeanisation of Greek Foreign Policy. West European Politics, 28:2, pp. 471-491.
15. Ethier, D. (2003) Is Democracy Promotion Effective? Comparing Conditionality and Incentives. Democratization, 10:1, pp. 99-120.
16. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52:4, pp. 887-917.
17. Foot, R. (2006) Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging. International Affairs, 82:1, pp. 77-94.
18. Fuhrmann, M. (2006) A Tale of Two Social Capitals: Revolutionary Collective Action in Kyrgyzstan. Problems of Post-Communism, 53:6, pp. 16-29.
19. Gershman, C. and Allen, M. (2006) The Assault on Democracy Assistance. Journal of Democracy, 17:2, pp. 36-51.
20. Gleason, G. (2006) The Uzbek Expulsion of US Forces and Realignment in Central Asia. Problems of Post-Communism, 53:2, pp. 49-60.
21. Grigorescu, A. (2002) European Institutions and Unsuccessful Norm Transmission: The Case of Transparency. International Politics, 39:4, pp. 467-489.
22. Haacke, J. (1999) The Concept of Flexible Engagement and the Practice of Enhanced Interaction: Intramural Challenges to the "ASEAN Way". Pacific Review, 12:4, pp. 581-611.
23. Hourn, K. (2000) Asean's Non-Interference Policy: Principles Under Pressure?, ASEAN Academic Press, London
24. Ikenberry, G. and Kupchan, C. (1990) Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization, 44:3, pp. 283-315.
25. Katanyuu, R. (2006) Beyond Non-Interference in ASEAN. Asian Survey, 46:6, pp. 825-845.
26. Kelley, J. (2004) International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization, 58:3, pp. 425-457.
27. Kireev, G. (2003) The Serpentine Path to the Shanghai G-5. International Affairs, 49:3, pp. 85-92.
28. Kuhonta, E. (2006) Walking a Tightrope: Democracy Versus Sovereignty in ASEAN's Illiberal Peace. The Pacific Review, 19:3, pp. 337-358.
29. Lai, B. and Reiter, D. (2000) Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44:2, pp. 203-227.
30. Lanteigne, M. (2006) In Medias Res: The Development of the Shanghai Co-operation Organization as a Security Community. Pacific Affairs, 79:4, pp. 605-622.
31. Logvinov, G. (2002) The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A New Qualitative Step Forward. International Affairs, 30:3, pp. 18-28.
32. Lukin, A. (2004) Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Problems and Prospects. International Affairs, 40:3, pp. 31-40.
33. Lynch, D. (2004) International "Decentering" and Democratization: The Case of Thailand. International Studies Quarterly, 48:2, pp. 339-362.
34. Marat, E. (2006) The Tulip Revolution: Kyrgyzstan One Year After, Jamestown Foundation, Washington, DC
35. McFaul, M. (2004) Democracy Promotion as a World Value. The Washington Quarterly, 28:1, pp. 147-163.
36. Norling, N. and Swanstrom, N. (2007) The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Trade, and the Roles of Iran, India and Pakistan. Central Asian Survey, 26:3, pp. 429-444.
37. Oresman, M. (2004) Catching the Shanghai Spirit. Foreign Policy, 142, pp. 78-79.
38. Otunbayeva, R. (2005) Kyrgyzstan's Tulip Revolution. Demokratizatsiya, 13:4, pp. 483-489.
39. Parish, R. and Peceny, M. (2002) Kantian Liberalism and the Collective Defense of Democracy in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 39:2, pp. 229-250.
40. Pevehouse, J. (2002) Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization, 56:3, pp. 515-549.
41. Pevehouse, J. (2002) With a Little Help from my Friends? Regional Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46:3, pp. 611-626.
42. Pevehouse, J. (2005) Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
43. Radyuhin, V. (2005) Karimov Says Riots Orchestrated by Islamists to Topple Regime. The Hindu, 15
44. Schimmelfennig, F. (2002) Introduction. Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States, pp. 1-32. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
45. Sheives, K. (2006) China Turns West: Beijing's Contemporary Strategy Towards Central Asia. Pacific Affairs, 79:2, pp. 205-224.
46. Shlyndov, A. (2006) Certain Aspects of Russian-Chinese Collaboration in the International Arena. Far Eastern Affairs, 34:2, pp. 68-81.
47. Smith, M. (2000) Conforming to Europe: The Domestic Impact of EU Foreign Policy Co-operation. Journal of European Public Policy, 7:4, pp. 613-631.
48. Thompson, M. (2001) Whatever Happened to "Asian Values"?. Journal of Democracy, 12:4, pp. 154-166.
49. Tokaev, K. (2007) Kazakhstan in the Contemporary World. International Affairs, 53:1, pp. 101-106.
50. Werner, S. (2000) The Effects of Political Similarity on the Onset of Militarized Disputes. Political Research Quarterly, 53:2, pp. 343-374.
51. Werner, S. and Limke, D. (1997) Opposites Do Not Attract: The Impact of Domestic Institutions, Power, and Prior Commitments on Alignment Choices. International Studies Quarterly, 41:3, pp. 529-546.
52. Yamakage, S. (2005) The Construction of an East Asian Order and the Limitations of the ASEAN Model. Asia-Pacific Review, 12:2, pp. 1-9.