Implication intensity: From the basic statistical definition to the entropic version

Statistical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 473-485

  Blanchard, Julien ^a   Kuntz, Pascale ^a   Guillet, Fabrice ^a   Gras, Regis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992065176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. [1] Agrawal, R., Imielinsky, T., and Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD’93, pp. 207-216.
2. Agrawal, R. and Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proc. of the 20th Int’l Conf. on Very Large Databases (VLDB’94), pp. 487-499.
3. Bayardo, R. J. and Agrawal, R. (1999). Mining the most interesting rules. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 145-154.
4. Bernard, J.M. (2002). Implicative analysis for multivariate binary data using an imprecise Dirichlet model. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference, to appear.
5. Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Silverstein, C. (1997). Beyond market baskets: Generalizing association rules to correlations. In Proc. of ACMSIGMOD Conf. on Management of Data SIGMOD’97, pp. 265-276.
6. Fleury, L. (1996). Knowledge discovery in a human resource management database (in French). PhD thesis, University of Nantes, France.
7. Fleury, L., Briand, H., Philippe, J., and Djeraba, C.(1995). Rule evaluation for knowledge discovery in databases. In Proc. of the 6th Conf. on Database and Expert System Appl., pp. 405-414.
8. Freitas, A. (1999). On rule interestingness measures. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal, 12(5), 309-315.
9. Gras, R. (1996). The statistical implication - A new method for data exploration (in French). La Pensee Sauvage, editor.
10. Gras, R., Kuntz, P. and Briand, H. (2001). Les fondements de l’analyse statistique implicative et quelques prolongements pour la fouille de donnes. Math-matiques et Sciences Humaines, 39(154-155),9-29.
11. Guillaume, S., Guillet, F., and Philippe, J. (1998). Improving the discovery of association rules with intensity of implication. In Proc. of the 2ndEur. Conf. of Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 318-327. L.N.A.I. 1510.
12. Hand, D., Mannila, H., and Smyth, P. (2001). Principles of data mining. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Hilderman, R. and Hamilton, H. (1999). Knowledge discovery and interestingness measures: a survey. Technical Report 99-04, University of Regina.
14. Kuntz, P., Guillet, F., Lehn, R., and Briand, H. (2000). A user-driven process for mining association rules. In Proc. of the 4th Eur. Conf. of Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 160-168. L.N.A.I. 1910.
15. Lerman, I.C. (1993). Likelihood linkage analysis classification method. Biochimie, 75, 379-397.
16. Liu, B., Hsu, W., Mun, L., and Lee, H. (1999). Finding interesting patterns using user expectations. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(6), 817-832.
17. Loevinger, J. (1947). A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of abilities. Psychological Monographs, 61(4).
18. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois.
19. Silberschatz, A. and Tuzhilin, A. (1995). On subjective measures of interestingness in knowledge discovery. In Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 275-281.
20. Tan, P. and Kumar, V. (2000). Interestingness measures for association patterns: a perspective. Technical Report TR00-036, University of Minnesota.