oMAP: Combining classifiers for aligning automatically OWL ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3806 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 133-147

  Straccia, Umberto ^a   Troncy, Raphaël ^a,b  

^a ISTI CNR   (Italy)

^b CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; CONFORMAL MAPPING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; PROBABILITY; SEMANTICS;

LEARNING-BASED CLASSIFIERS; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; OWL ONTOLOGIES; SEMANTIC WEB;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 33744815621     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11581062_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW'02), Sigüenza, Spain, 2002, 114-121.
3. nd Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC'03), Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2003, 659-675.
4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 2001, 34-43.
5. Dhamankar, R., Lee, Y., Doan, A., Halevy, A., Domingos, P.: iMap: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Paris, France, 2004, 383-394.
6. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web. The VLDB Journal, 12(4), 2003, 303-319.
7. rd Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC'04), Hiroshima, Japan, 2004, 683-697.
8. rd Int. Semantic Web Con}. (ISWC'04), Hiroshima, Japan, 2004, 698-712.
9. th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'04), Valence, Spain, 2004, 333-337.
10. th Int. Conf. on Database Theory (ICDT'OS), Sienna, Italy, 2003, 207-224.
11. st Int. Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation. Whistler, Canada, 2004.
12. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1), 2003, 7-26.
13. th Int. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW'04), New York, USA, 2004, 723-731.
14. Isaac, A., Troncy, R.: Designing and Using an Audio-Visual Description Core Ontology. In Workshop on Core Ontologies in Ontology Engineering at EKAW'04, Whittlebury Hall, Northamptonshire, UK, 2004.
15. KW Consortium: State of the Art on Ontology Alignment. Deliverable Knowledge Web 2.2.3, FP6-507482, 2004.
16. th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'01), Roma, Italy, 2001, 49-58.
17. th European Conf. on Information Retrieval (ECIR'05), Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2005, 81-95.
18. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Anchor-PROMPT: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at IJCAI'01, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2001.
19. OWL, Web Ontology Language Reference Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
20. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 1980, 130-137.
21. Rahm, E., Bernstein., P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10(4), 2001, 334-350.
22. RDF, Ressource Description Framework Primer W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
23. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comuting Surveys, 34(1), 2002, 1-47.
24. rd Int. Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON'04), Hiroshima, Japan, 2004.