A theory-centric real-time assessment of programming

Proceedings - The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 139-143

  Rao, Shilpi ^b   Kumar, Vive ^a,b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTERS; CURRICULA; EDUCATION; LINGUISTICS; PROGRAM COMPILERS; STANDARDS; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY;

BEST PRACTICES; DESIGN ISSUES; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING; LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS; LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES; PROBLEM STATEMENTS; PROGRAM DESIGN; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PROGRAMMING STYLES; REAL-TIME ASSESSMENTS; SKILL DEVELOPMENT;

PROGRAMMING THEORY;

EID: 51849105184     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2008.288     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. G. Spohrer and E. Soloway. Analyzing the high frequency bugs in novice programs. In Empirical Studies of Programmers, pp. 230-251, 1986.
2. S. Rao, L. Doherty, and V. S. Kumar. Towards Mixed-Initiative Interactions in Novice Programming. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'07), pp. 822-824, 2007.
3. L. A. Madeo and D. A. Bird. The effect of user-specified language elements on learning to program. Research on Computing in Education, 22(1), pp. 236-348, 1990.
4. J. Vaid. Cognitive Psychology and Computer Programming. 1998.
5. V. S. Kumar. An Instrument for Providing Formative Feedback to Novice Programmers. In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), volume 71, 2004.
6. L. Doherty, J. Shakya, M. Jordanov, P. Lougheed, D. Brokenshire, S. Rao, and V. S. Kumar. Recognizing Opportunities for Mixed-Initiative Interactions in Novice Programming. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Mixed-Initiative Problem-Solving Assistants, 2005.
7. A. Zeller. Why Programs Fail: A Guide to Systematic Debugging. Morgan Kaufmann, NY, 2005.
8. S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer. A Metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6), pp. 476-493, 1994.
9. M. Rolling. Blue J - The Interactive Java Environment - Extensions, 2007. www.bluej.org/extensions/extensions.html.
10. Morris, R., Church, H., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L. Z., & Winne, P. H. (in press). The use of roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gStudy. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008.
11. F. Tip and P. Sweeney. Practical Extraction Techniques for Java. ACM transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 24(6), pp. 625-666, 2002.
12. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Rao, S., Model Tracing of Coding Styles of Programmers: a formative approach, MSc Thesis, Simon Fraser University, 2007.