Recognizing opportunities for mixed-initiative interactions in Novice programming

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-05-07, Issue , 2005, Pages 51-56

  Doherty, Liam ^a   Lougheed, Patrick ^a   Brokenshire, David ^a   Jordanov, Mayo ^a   Rao, Shilpi ^a   Shakya, Jurika ^a   Kumar, Vive ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESEARCH; STUDENTS;

FORMATIVE FEEDBACK; MIXED-INITIATIVE SYSTEM; NOVICE PROGRAMMING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 33645999353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Liffick, B., & Aiken, R. 1996. A novice programmer's support environment. Proceedings of the SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education. Barcelona, Spain.
2. Borgman, C.L. 1986. The User's Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System: An Experiment on a Prototype Online Catalog. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1):47-64.
3. Corbett, A.T., and Anderson, J.R. 1992. The Lisp Intelligent Tutoring System: Research in Skill Acquisition. In Larkin, J., and Chabay, R. (Eds.) Computer assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems: Shared goals and complementary approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. 1983. Mental Models. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Madeo, L.A., and Bird, D.A. 1990. The effect of user-specified language elements on learning to program. Research on Computing in Education, 22(1),:336-348.
6. Collard, M., Maletic, J.I., and Marcus, A. 2002. Supporting document and data views of source code. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. Virginia, USA: Association of Computing Machinery.
7. Early, P.C., Northcraft, G.B., Lee, C., and Lituchy, T.R. 1990. Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1): 87-105.
8. Payne, S.J. 1988. Methods and mental models in theories of cognitive skills. In J.Self (Ed.), 69-87. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
9. Yu-Fen, S., and Alessi, S.M. 1993. Mental models and transfer of learning in computer programming. Research on Computing in Education, 26(2):154-175.
10. Spohrer, J.G., and Soloway, E. 1986. Analyzing the high frequency bugs in novice programs, In Soloway, E., and Iyengar, S. (Eds.), 230-251.
11. Dijkstra, E.W. 1970. Notes on Structural Programming, Technical Report, TH-Report 70-WSK-03, Dept. of Mathematics, Technological University Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
12. Kumar, V.S. 2004. An instrument for providing formative feedback to novice programmers, In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), Division I - Education in the professions, Paper session -Relationship between teaching and learning (13.032), 71, San Diego, CA, USA.
13. Vass, M., Carroll, J. M., and Shaffer, C. A. 2002. Supporting creativity in problem solving environments. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (Loughborough, UK, October 13 - 16, 2002). C&C '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 31-37.
14. Chu, S.T.L. Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice: Educational Psychology-Based Instructional Design for Developing Online Content. Presented at AERA 2005, Montreal QC, Canada.
15. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. 2003. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
16. Zimmerman, B. 2002. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 41(2). Ohio, USA.