Observability index selection for robot calibration

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 831-836

  Sun, Yu ^a   Hollerbach, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-OPTIMALITY; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; ROBOT CALIBRATION;

CALIBRATION; CONTROL THEORY; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 51649129870     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543308     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. C. Atkinson. The usefulness of optimum experimental designs. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B, 58(1):59-76, 1996.
2. R. Bernhardt and S. Albright, editors. Theory of kinematic modelling and numerical procedures for robot calibration. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1990.
3. J. H. Borm and C. H. Menq. Determination of optimal measurement configurations for robot calibration based on observibility measure. International Journal of Robotics Research, 10(1):51-63, 1991.
4. H. Chernoff. Locally optimum designs for estimating parameters. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24:586-602, 1953.
5. M. R. Driels and U. S. Pathre. Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments. Journal of Robotic Systems, 7(2):197-223, 1990.
6. S. Ehrenfeld. On the efficiencies of experimental designs. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26:247-255, 1955.
7. G. Elfving. Optimum allocation in linear regression theory. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23:255-262, 1952.
8. J. Fiefer and J. Wolfowitz. Optimum designs in regression problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30:271-294, 1959.
9. J. Kiefer. General equivalence theory for optimum designs (approximate theory). Annals of Statistics, 2:849-879, 1974.
10. C. H. Menq, J. H. Borm, and J. Z. Lai. Identification and observability measure of a basis set of error parameters in robot calibration. ASME Journal Mechamissions, and Automation in Design, 111(4):513-518, 1989.
11. B. W. Mooring and M. R. D. Z. S. Roth, editors. Fundamentals of Manipulator Calibration. John Wilery & sons, New York, 1991.
12. A. Nahvi and J. Hollerbach. The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 647-654, 1996.
13. A. Nahvi, J. Hollerbach, and V. Hayward. Calibration of a parallel robot using multiple kinematic closed loops. In Proc. IEEE International Conference Robotics and Automation, pages 407-412, 1994.
14. F. Pukelsheim. Optimal design of experiments. Wiley, New York, 1993.
15. K. Smith. On the standard deviations of adjusted and interpolated values of an observed polynomial function and its constants and the guidance they give towards a proper choice of the distribution of observations. Biometrika, 12(1&2):1-85, 1918.
16. R. C. St John and N. R. Draper. D-optimality for regression designs: a review. Technometrics, 17(1):1523, 1975.
17. A. Wald. On the efficient design of statistical investigations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(2):134-140, 1943.