Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Vanhoenacker, Piet K ^a   Decramer, Isabel ^a,b   Bladt, Olivier ^a   Sarno, Giovanna ^b   Van Hul, Erik ^a   Wijns, William ^b   Dwamena, Ben A ^c  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SELECTION; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; GRAFT OCCLUSION; INCIDENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; STATISTICS; STENT;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 51649108854     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-8-14     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kiemeneij F Serruys PW Macaya C Rutsch W Heyndrickx G Albertsson P Fajadet J Legrand V Materne P Belardi J Sigwart U Colombo A Goy JJ Disco CM Morel MA Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: Five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 37:1598-1603 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01207-4 11345371
2. Morice MC Serruys PW Sousa JE Fajadet J Ban HE Perin M Colombo A Schuler G Barragan P Guagliumi G Molnar F Falotico R A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1773-1780 10.1056/NEJMoa012843 12050336
3. Roiron C Sanchez P Bouzamondo A Lechat P Montalescot G Drug eluting stents: An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Heart 2006, 92:641-649 10.1136/hrt.2005.061622 16216853
4. Johnson LW Krone R Cardiac catheterization 1991: A report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I) Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993, 28:219-220 8439997
5. Scanlon PJ Faxon DP Audet AM Carabello B Dehmer GJ Eagle KA Legako RD Leon DF Murray JA Nissen SE Pepine CJ Watson RM Ritchie JL Gibbons RJ Cheitlin MD Gardner TJ Garson A Jr Russell RO Jr Ryan TJ Smith SC Jr ACC/ AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: Executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Circulation 1999, 99:2345-2357 10226103
6. Wyman RM Safian RD Portway V Skillman JJ McKay RG Baim DS Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization J Am Coll Cardiol 1988, 12:1400-1406 2973480
7. Schuijf JD Bax JJ Jukema JW Lamb HJ Warda HM Vliegen HW de RA Wall van der EE Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography Am J Cardiol 2004, 94:427-430 10.1016/ j.amjcard.2004.04.057 15325923
8. Cademartiri F Mollet N Lemos PA Pugliese F Baks T McFadden EP Krestin GP de Feyter PJ Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis Am J Cardiol 2005, 96:799-802 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.023 16169364
9. Gilard M Cornily JC Rioufol G Finet G Pennec PY Mansourati J Blanc JJ Boschat J Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography Am J Cardiol 2005, 95:110-112 10.1016/ j.amjcard.2004.08.073 15619405
10. Gaspar T Halon DA Lewis BS Adawi S Schliamser JE Rubinshtein R Flugelman MY Peled N Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1573-1579 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.049 16226187
11. Chabbert V Carrie D Bennaceur M Maupas E Lauwers V Mhem M Lhermusier T Elbaz M Joffre F Rousseau H Puel J Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) Eur Radiol 2006 17115159
12. Gilard M Cornily JC Pennec PY Le GG Nonent M Mansourati J Blanc JJ Boschat J Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography Heart 2006, 92:58-61 10.1136/hrt.2004.056010 15845613
13. Ohnuki K Yoshida S Ohta M Shimizu M Mochizuki S Nishioka M Sakuma T Fukuda K Ishizaki M Hirakawa E Andou T New diagnostic technique in multi-slice computed tomography for in-stent restenosis: Pixel count method Int J Cardiol 2006, 108:251-258 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.013 15982759
14. Watanabe M Uemura S Iwama H Okayama S Takeda Y Kawata H Horii M Nakajima T Hirohashi S Kichikawa K Ookura A Saito Y Usefulness of 16-slice multislice spiral computed tomography for follow-up study of coronary stent implantation Circ J 2006, 70:691-697 10.1253/circj.70.691 16723789
15. Van Mieghem CA Cademartiri F Mollet NR Malagutti P Valgimigli M Meijboom WB Pugliese F McFadden EP Ligthart J Runza G Bruining N Smits PC Regar E Giessen van der WJ Sianos G van DR de JP Krestin GP Serruys PW de Feyter PJ Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: A comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound Circulation 2006, 114:645-653 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.608950 16894038
16. Rist C von ZF Nikolaou K Kirchin MA Wintersperger BJ Johnson TR Knez A Leber AW Reiser MF Becker CR Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography Acad Radiol 2006, 13:1465-1473 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.044 17138114
17. Rixe J Achenbach S Ropers D Baum U Kuettner A Ropers U Bautz W Daniel WG Anders K Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography Eur Heart J 2006, 27:2567-2572 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl303 17035252
18. Kefer JM Coche E Vanoverschelde JL Gerber BL Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries Eur Radiol 2007, 17:87-96 10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5 16733682
19. Ehara M Kawai M Surmely JF Matsubara T Terashima M Tsuchikane E Kinoshita Y Ito T Takeda Y Nasu K Tanaka N Murata A Fujita H Sato K Kodama A Katoh O Suzuki T Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography comparison with invasive coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:951-959 10.1016/ j.jacc.2006.10.065 17336718
20. Oncel D Oncel G Karaca M Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience Radiology 2007, 242:403-409 10.1148/ radiol.2422060065 17255411
21. Maintz D Juergens KU Wichter T Grude M Heindel W Fischbach R Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: In vitro evaluation Eur Radiol 2003, 13:830-835 12664124
22. Maintz D Grude M Fallenberg EM Heindel W Fischbach R Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography Acta Radiol 2003, 44:597-603 10.1046/j.1600-0455.2003.00130.x 14616203
23. Bossuyt PM Irwig L Craig J Glasziou P Comparative accuracy: Assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways BMJ 2006, 332:1089-1092 1458557 16675820 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089
24. Staunton M Evidence-based radiology: Steps 1 and 2-asking answerable questions and searching for evidence Radiology 2007, 242:23-31 10.1148/ radiol.2421052135 17185659
25. Haynes RB Wilczynski NL Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: Analytical survey BMJ 2004, 328:1040-403841 15073027 10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE
26. Juni P Witschi A Bloch R Egger M The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis JAMA 1999, 282:1054-1060 10.1001/ jama.282.11.1054 10493204
27. Whiting P Rutjes AW Reitsma JB Bossuyt PM Kleijnen J The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:25 305345 14606960 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
28. Gavaghan DJ Moore RA McQuay HJ An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data Pain 2000, 85:415-424 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00302-4 10781914
29. Higgins JP Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 2002, 21:1539-1558 10.1002/sim.1186 12111919
30. Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 2003, 327:557-560 192859 12958120 10.1136/ bmj.327.7414.557
31. Deeks JJ Macaskill P Irwig L The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:882-893 10.1016/ j.jclinepi.2005.01.016 16085191
32. Egger M Davey SG Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997, 315:629-634 2127453 9310563
33. Sterne JA Egger M Smith GD Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis BMJ 2001, 323:101-105 1120714 11451790 10.1136/ bmj.323.7304.101
34. Littenberg B Moses LE Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: A new meta-analytic method Med Decis Making 1993, 13:313-321 10.1177/0272989X9301300408 8246704
35. Moses LE Shapiro D Littenberg B Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: Data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med 1993, 12:1293-1316 8210827
36. Reitsma JB Glas AS Rutjes AW Scholten RJ Bossuyt PM Zwinderman AH Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:982-990 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 16168343
37. Vanhoenacker PK Heijenbrok-Kal MH Van Heste R Decramer I Van Hoe LR Wijns W Hunink MG Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis Radiology 2007, 244:419-428 10.1148/radiol.2442061218 17641365
38. Zwinderman AH Bossuyt PM We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews Stat Med 2008, 27:687-697 10.1002/sim.2992 17611957
39. Jaeschke R Guyatt GH Sackett DL Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA 1994, 271:703-707 10.1001/ jama.271.9.703 8309035
40. Dori G Denekamp Y Fishman S Bitterman H Exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for detecting restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A review of performance J Intern Med 2003, 253:253-262 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01101.x 12603492
41. Elhendy A Tsutsui JM O'Leary EL Xie F Majeed F Porter TR Evaluation of restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with previous percutaneous coronary interventions by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging Heart 2006, 92:1480-1483 10.1136/hrt.2005.086140 16606862
42. Elhendy A Schinkel AF van Domberg RT Bax JJ Valkema R Poldermans D Non-invasive diagnosis of in stent stenosis by stress 99 m technetium tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006, 22:657-662 10.1007/s10554-006-9087-6 16628382
43. Maintz D Botnar RM Fischbach R Heindel W Manning WJ Stuber M Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of the stent lumen: A phantom study J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002, 4:359-367 10.1081/ JCMR-120013303 12234107
44. Sardanelli F Zandrino F Molinari G Iozzelli A Balbi M Barsotti A MR evaluation of coronary stents with navigator echo and breath-hold cine gradient-echo techniques Eur Radiol 2002, 12:193-200 10.1007/ s003300101017 11868098
45. Spuentrup E Ruebben A Mahnken A Stuber M Kolker C Nguyen TH Gunther RW Buecker A Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent Circulation 2005, 111:1019-1026 10.1161/01.CIR.0000156462.97532.8F 15723984
46. Hausleiter J Meyer T Hadamitzky M Huber E Zankl M Martinoff S Kastrati A Schomig A Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates Circulation 2006, 113:1305-1310 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490 16520411
47. Cademartiri F Runza G Mollet NR Luccichenti G Belgrano M Bartolotta TV Galia M Midiri M Pozzi MR Krestin GP Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography Radiol Med (Torino) 2005, 110:42-51 16163138
48. Cademartiri F Mollet NR Runza G Belgrano M Malagutti P Meijboom BW Midiri M Feyter PJ Krestin GP Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006, 22:101-105 10.1007/s10554-005-9010-6 16077999