Editorial 7.3: Introduction to the thematic issue

Language Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 191-199

  Menken, Kate ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51649088098     PISSN: 15684555     EISSN: 15731863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10993-008-9104-9     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Abedi, J. (2004). The no child left behind act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4-14.
2. Abedi, J. & Dietal, R. (2004, Winter). Challenges in the no child left behind act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
3. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Corson, D. (1999). Language policy in schools: A resource for teachers and administrators. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Crawford, J. (1999). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice. Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Services Inc.
7. Crawford, J. (2000). At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8. Crawford, J. (2002, Summer). Obituary: The bilingual ed act, 1968-2002. Rethinking schools online, 16(4): 1-4. Retrieved July 13, 2008 from, http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/16_04/Bil164.shtml.
9. Crawford, J. (2004). No child left behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Paper for the Forum on ideas to improve the NCLB accountability provisions for students with disabilities and English language learners. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy & National Association for Bilingual Education.
10. Evans, B., & Hornberger, N. (2005). No child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4, 87-106.
11. Government Accountability Office. (2006). No child left behind act: Assistance from education could help states better measure progress of students with limited English proficiency. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Hill, P. (2000). The federal role in education. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy 2000 (pp. 11-40). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13. Hornberger, N. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 24-41). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
14. Manna, P. (2006). School's in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
15. Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
16. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2006). How has the English language learner population changed in recent years? Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 12, 2008 http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/expert/faq/08leps. html.
17. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2007). The growing number of limited English proficient students 1995/96-2005/06. Poster. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 12, 2008 from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ policy/states/reports/statedata/2005LEP/GrowingLEP_0506.pd.
18. New York City Department of Education, Office of English Language Learners. (2008). New York City's English language learners: Demographics and performance. Draft Report. New York: Author.
19. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman/Pearson Education.
20. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.
21. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). QT-P16 Language spoken at home: 2000. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
23. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. P.L. 107-110. Washington, DC.
24. U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Education Secretary. (2006). Secretary spellings announces partnership with states to improve accountability for limited English proficient students. Press Release, July 27, 2006.
25. Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), Language testing and assessment, Encyclopedia of language and education, Volume 7. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Wiley, T., & Wright, W. (2004). Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the "age of accountability". Educational Policy, 18(1), 142-168.