Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and gleason score to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy

European Urology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 571-578

  Poulakis, Vassilis ^a   Witzsch, Ulrich ^a   De Vries, Rachelle ^a   Emmerlich, Volker ^a   Meves, Michael ^a   Altmannsberger, Hans Michael ^a   Becht, Eduard ^a  

^a KRANKENHAUS NORDWEST   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network analysis; Neural network; Prediction; Prostate; Prostate neoplasm; Prostate resonance imaging; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 5144234464     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. Han, and A.W. Partin Nomograms for clinically localized prostate cancer. Part I: radical prostatectomy Semin Urol Oncol. 20 2002 123 130
2. M.W. Kattan, J.A. Eastham, A.M. Stapleton, T.M. Wheeler, and P.T. Scardino A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Natl Cancer Inst. 90 1998 766 771
3. M. Graefen, P.I. Karakiewicz, I. Cagiannos, D.I. Quinn, S.M. Henshall, and J.J. Grygiel International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol. 20 2002 3206 3212
4. A.V. D'Amico, R. Whittington, S.B. Malkowicz, D. Schultz, J. Fondurulia, and M.H. Chen Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer J Clin Oncol. 18 2000 1164 1172
5. M. Han, A.W. Partin, M. Zahurak, S. Piantadosi, J.I. Epstein, and P.C. Walsh Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol. 169 2003 517 523
6. T.A. Stamey Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below 10 μg/l predicts neither the presence of prostate cancer nor the rate of postoperative PSA failure Clin Chem. 47 2001 631 634
7. T.A. Stamey, J.E. McNeal, C.M. Yemoto, B.M. Sigal, and I.M. Johnstone Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer JAMA 281 1999 1395 1400
8. P. Hammerer, and H. Huland Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluation J Urol. 151 1994 99 102
9. L.H. Sobin C. Wittekind TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 5th ed. 1997 John Wiley & Sons New York 170 p
10. P.A. Humphrey Complete histologic serial sectioning of a prostate gland with adenocarcinoma Am J Surg Pathol. 17 1993 468 472
11. Walsh PC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, editors. Campell's Urology. 6th Edition. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992. p. 2865-86 [Chapter 78].
12. A.V. D'Amico, R. Whittington, S.B. Malkowicz, D. Schultz, M. Schnall, and J.E. Tomaszewski Critical analysis of the ability of the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging scan to predict pathologic stage, margin status, and postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer J Clin Oncol. 14 1996 1770 1777
13. E.S. Siegelman, and M.D. Schnall Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the bladder and prostate Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 4 1996 153 169
14. H. Hricak, S. White, D. Vigneron, J. Kurhanewicz, A. Kosco, and D. Levin Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils Radiology. 193 1994 703 709
15. J.J. Wong-You-Cheong, and T.L. Krebs MR imaging of prostate cancer Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 8 2000 869 886
16. E.K. Outwater, R.O. Petersen, E.S. Siegelman, L.G. Gomella, C.E. Chernesky, and D.G. Mitchell Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images Radiology. 193 1994 333 339
17. K.K. Yu, H. Hricak, R. Alagappan, D.M. Chernoff, P. Bacchetti, and C.J. Zaloudek Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis Radiology. 202 1997 697 702
18. J.E. Husband, A.R. Padhani, A.D. MacVicar, and P. Revell Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils Clin Radiol. 53 1998 673 681
19. R. Aziza, M. Soulie, G. Escourrou, J. Bachaud, L. Molinie, and C. Tollon Local staging of prostate carcinoma with phased array MR imaging: prospective study over 5 years J Radiol. 83 2002 39 44
20. J. Rorvik, O.J. Halvorsen, G. Albrektsen, L. Ersland, L. Daehlin, and S. Haukaas MRI with an endorectal coil for staging of clinically localised prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy Eur Radiol. 9 1999 29 34
21. K. Ogura, S. Maekawa, K. Okubo, Y. Aoki, T. Okada, and K. Oda Dynamic endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for local staging and detection of neurovascular bundle involvement of prostate cancer: correlation with histopathologic results Urology 57 2001 721 726
22. C.R. Porter, C. O'Donnell, E.D. Crawford, E.J. Gamito, B. Sentizimary, and A. De Rosalia Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in a racially diverse population: a prospective study Urology. 60 2002 831 835
23. R.M. Golden Mathematical methods for neural network analysis and design 1996 MIT Press Cambridge (MA)
24. F.E. Harrell Jr, K.L. Lee, and D.B. Mark Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat Med. 15 1996 361 387
25. J.A. Hanley, and B.J. McNeil A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 1983 839 843
26. M. Perrotti, A. Pantuck, F. Rabbani, R.S. Israeli, and R.E. Weiss Review of staging modalities in clinically localized prostate cancer Urology 54 1999 208 214
27. S.J. Freedland, M.E. Sutter, F. Dorey, and W.J. Aronson Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy Prostate-specific antigen. Urology. 61 2003 365 369
28. A. Tewari, M. Issa, R. El-Galley, H. Stricker, J. Peabody, and J. Pow-Sang Genetic adaptive neural network to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study Mol Urol. 5 2001 163 169
29. M.W. Kattan, A.M. Stapleton, T.M. Wheeler, and P.T. Scardino Evaluation of a nomogram used to predict the pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate carcinoma Cancer. 79 1997 528 537
30. R.J. Palisaan, M. Graefen, P.I. Karakiewicz, P.G. Hammerer, E. Huland, and A. Haese Assessment of clinical and pathologic characteristics predisposing to disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer Eur Urol. 41 2002 155 161
31. T.S. Bates, D.A. Gillatt, P.M. Cavanagh, and M. Speakman A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation Br J Urol. 79 1997 927 932
32. M. Sanchez-Chapado, J.C. Angulo, C. Ibarburen, F. Aguado, A. Ruiz, and J. Viano Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer Eur Urol. 32 1997 140 149