A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 927-932

  Bates, T S ^a,b,c,d,e   Gillatt, D A ^a   Cavanagh, P M ^a   Speakman, M ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Somerset MRI Centre   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Urology ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d Somerset Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^e DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Staging; Transrectal ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031400405     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00188.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148: 331-7
2. Stamey TA, Villers AA, McNeal JE, Link PC, Freiha FS. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol 1990; 143: 1166-73
3. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993; 71: 3582-93
4. Schnall MD, Kressel HY, Pollack KP et al. The development of an intracavitary inflatable surface coil for high resolution proton imaging and spectroscopy. [Abstract] In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1986
5. Martin JF, Hajek P, Baker L et al. Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology 1988; 167: 268-70
6. Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HM et al. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989; 172: 570-4
7. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ et al. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J Urol 1993; 150: 391-5
8. Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Demlow TA et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994; 190: 323-7
9. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski JE, Pollack HP, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178: 797-802
10. Bates TS, Speakman M, Cavanagh P, Gillatt DA. Endorectal MRI using a 0.5 tesla mid-field system in the staging of localised prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 550-3
11. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES et al. Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994; 193: 333-9
12. Jager GJ, Barentsz JO, de la Rosette JJ, Rosenbusch G. Preliminary results of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Radiologe 1994; 34: 129-33
13. Cornud F, Belin X, Flam T et al. Local staging of prostate cancer by endorectal MRI using fast spin-echo sequences: prospective correlation with pathological findings after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 843-50
14. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994; 192: 47-54
15. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional co-operative trial. N Eng J Med 1990; 323: 621-6
16. Schiebler ML, McSherry S, Keefe B, et al. Comparison of the digital rectal examination, endorectal ultrasound and body coil magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urol Radiol 1991; 13: 110-8
17. Cornud F, Belin X, Fromont G et al. What may be expected from endorectal echography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local extension of cancer of the prostate? J Radiol 1992; 73: 617-27
18. Huch Böni RA, Boner JA, Debatin JF et al. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging an clinical methods. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 593-600
19. Jones EC. Resection margin status in radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens: relationship to type of operation, tumour size, tumour grade and local tumour extension. J Urol 1990; 144: 89-93
20. Mirowitz SA, Brown JJ. Heiken JP. Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186: 153-7
21. Brown G, Macvicar DA, Ayton V, Husband JE. The role of intravenous contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 601-6