Syntacrobatics: Quality and reformulation in simultaneous-with-text

Interpreting

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 199-230

  Setton, Robin ^a,c   Motta, Manuela ^b,d  

^a SHANGHAI INTERNATIONAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c Ecole de Traduction et d'Interprétation ^*  (France)

^d Ecole de Traduction et d'Interprétation   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Deverbalisation; Quality; Reformulation; SI with text; Simultaneous interpreting

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249156726     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.9.2.04set     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson, L. (1994). Simultaneous interpretation: Contextual and translation aspects. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 101-120
2. Barik, H. C. (1973). Simultaneous interpretation: Temporal and quantitative data. Language and Speech 16, 237-271
3. Barik, H. C. (1975). Simultaneous interpretation: Qualitative and linguistic data. Language and Speech 18, 272-297
4. Berk-Seligson, S. (1998/2002). The impact of politeness in witness testimony: The influence of the court interpreter. Multilingua 7 (4), 411-439
5. (reprinted in F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 279-292)
6. Bühler, H. (1986). Linguistic (semantic) and extralinguistic (pragmatic) criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters. Multilingua 5 (4), 231-235
7. Carroll, J. B. (1978). Linguistic abilities in translators and interpreters. In D. Gerver & H. W. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language interpretation and communication. Proceedings of the NATO Symposium on Language Interpretation and Communication, Venice, 1977. New York: Plenum Press, 119-129
8. Chiaro, D. & Nocella, G. (2004). Interpreters' perception of linguistic and non-linguistic factors affecting quality: A survey through the World Wide Web. Meta 49 (2), 278-293
9. Collados Ais, A. (1998). La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación simultánea: La importancia de la comunicación no verbal. Granada: Comares
10. Dillinger, M. ( 1994). Comprehension during interpreting: What do interpreters know that bilinguals don't? In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 155-189
11. Donovan, C. (1990). La fidélité en interprétation. Thèse de doctorat, ESIT, Université de Paris III
12. Donovan, C. (2002). User expectations. In Proceedings of EMCI workshop, Paris 2002. Teaching simultaneous interpretation into a B language. Paris: ESIT, 1-13
13. Ericsson, K. A. (2000/01). Expertise in interpreting. Interpreting 5 (2), 187-220
14. Garzone, G. (2003). Reliability of quality criteria evaluation in survey research. In A. Collados Ais, M. M. Fernández Sánchez & D. Gile (Eds.), La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación: Investigación. Granada: Comares, 23-30
15. Gerver, D. (1969). The effects of source language presentation rate on the performance of simultaneous conference interpreters. In E. Foulke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Louisville Conference on Rate and/or Frequency-Controlled Speech. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, 162-184
16. Gerver, D. (1974a). Simultaneous listening and speaking and retention of prose. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26, 337-342
17. Gerver, D. (1974b). The effects of noise on the performance of simultaneous interpreters: Accuracy of performance. Acta Psychologica 38, 159-167
18. Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, 165-207
19. Gile, D. (1992). Basic theoretical components for interpreter and translator training. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting: Training, talent and experience. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185-193
20. Gile, D. (1995). Fidelity assessment in consecutive interpretation: An experiment. Target 7 (1), 151-164
21. Gile, D. (1999). Variability in the perception of fidelity in simultaneous interpretation. Hermes. Journal of Linguistics 23, 51-80
22. Gile, D. (2005). The CIRINBulletin no. 30, June 2005. http://cirinandgile.com/Bulletin%2030rtf. htm (accessed 21 March 2007)
23. Hale, S. (1997). The interpreter on trial: Pragmatics in court interpreting. In S. E. Carr, R. P. Roberts, A. Dufour & D. Steyn (Eds.), The critical link: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 201-211
24. Hoffman, R. R. (1997). The cognitive psychology of expertise and the domain of interpreting. Interpreting 2 (1/2), 189-230
25. Isham, W. (1994). Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap. Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 191-211
26. Kurz, I. (1989). Conference interpreting -user expectations. In D. L. Hammond (Ed.), Coming of age: Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the American Translators' Association. Medford, NJ: Learned Information, 143-148
27. Kurz, I. (1993). Conference interpretation: Expectations of different user groups. The Interpreters' Newsletter 5, 13-21
28. Kurz, I. & Pöchhacker, F. (1995). Quality in TV interpreting. Translatio. Nouvelles de la FIT - FIT Newsletter N.s. 14 (3/4), 350-358
29. Lamberger-Felber, H. (2001). Text-oriented research into interpreting: Examples from a casestudy. Hermes. Journal of Linguistics 26, 39-63
30. Lederer, M. (1981). La traduction simultanée. Paris: Minard Lettres Modernes
31. Liu M. (2001). Expertise in simultaneous interpretation: A working memory analysis. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin
32. Mackintosh, J. (1983). Relay interpretation: An exploratory study. MA thesis, University of London
33. Moser, P. (1996). Expectations of users of conference interpretation. Interpreting 1 (2), 145-178
34. Moser-Mercer, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., Casado, B. & Künzli, A. (2000). Searching to define expertise in interpreting. In B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 107-132
35. Pöchhacker, F. (1994). Quality assurance in simultaneous interpreting. In C. Dollerup & A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights, aims, visions. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 232-242
36. Pöchhacker, F. (2004). Introducing interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge
37. Seleskovitch, D. (1975). Langage, langues et mémoire: études de la prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Paris: Minard Lettres Modernes
38. Seleskovitch, D. (1978). Interpreting for international conferences: Problems of language and communication. Washington, DC: Pen and Booth
39. Setton, R. (1999). Simultaneous interpretation: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
40. Setton, R. (2002). A methodology for the analysis of interpretation corpora. In G. Garzone & M. Viezzi (Eds.), Interpreting in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Selected papers from the 1st Forlì Conference on Interpreting Studies, 9-11 November 2000. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29-45
41. Setton, R. (2003). Words and sense: Revisiting lexical processes in interpreting. Forum 1 (1), 139-168
42. Setton, R. (2005). Pointing to contexts: A relevance-theoretic approach to assessing quality and difficulty in interpreting. In H. V. Dam, J. Engberg & H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (Eds.), Knowledge systems and translation. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 275-312
43. Setton, R. (2006). New demands on interpreting and the learning curve in interpreter training. In M. Chai & J. Zhang (Eds.), Professionalization in interpreting: International experience and developments in China (Kouyi de zhuanyehua daolu: guoji jingyan he zhongguo shixian). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 36-71
44. Tommola, J. & Lindholm, J. (1995). Experimental research in interpreting: Which dependent variable? In J. Tommola (Ed.), Topics in interpreting research. Turku: University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting, 121-133