Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 454-473

  Koerber, Amy ^a   McMichael, Lonie ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinarity; Qualitative research; Research methods; Sample selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 51149089275     PISSN: 10506519     EISSN: 15524574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1050651908320362     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barton, E. (2000). More methodological matters: Against negative argumentation. College Composition and Communication, 51, 399-416.
2. Barton, E. (2001). Design in observational research on the discourse of medicine: Toward disciplined interdisciplinarity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 309-332.
3. Berkenkotter, C. (2002). Analyzing everyday texts in organizational settings. In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 47-66). Westport, CT: Praeger.
4. Blakeslee, A., & Fleischer, C. (2007). Becoming a writing researcher. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Britt, E.C. (2001). Conceiving normalcy: Rhetoric, law, and the double binds of infertility. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
6. Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 12, 176-181.
7. Campbell, K.S. (1999). Qualitative research methods for solving workplace problems. Technical Communication, 46, 532-545.
8. Carliner, S. (1994). A call to research. Technical Communication, 41, 615-619.
9. Charmaz, K.C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New York: Sage.
10. Charney, D. (1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47, 567-593.
11. Charney, D. (2001). Guest editor's introduction: Prospects for research in technical and scientific communication-Part 1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 267-268.
12. Coyne, I.T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries ? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630.
13. Giacomini, M.K., & Cook, D.J. (2000). Users' guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B: What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients ? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 478-482.
14. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
15. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
16. Goubil-Gambrell, P. (1992). A practitioner's guide to research methods. Technical Communication, 39, 582-591.
17. Graham, M.L., Ward, B., Munro, G., Snow, P., & Ellis, J. (2006). Rural parents, teenagers and alcohol: What are parents thinking ? Rural Remote Health, 6 (1). 383.
18. Gurak, L., & Lay, M. M. (Eds.). (2002). Research in technical communication. Westport, CT: Praeger.
19. Haas, C., & Witte, S.P. (2001). Writing as an embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 413-457.
20. Hayhoe, G. (1997). What research do we need, and why should practitioners care ? Technical Communication, 44, 19-21.
21. Higginbottom, G.M.A. (2004). Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 12 (1). 7-19.
22. Hoddinott, P., & Pill, R. (1999). Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. British Medical Journal, 318, 30-34.
23. Hughes, M.A., & Hayhoe, G.F. (2007). A research primer for technical communication. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S.A. (2004). Central works in technical communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Katz, S.M. (2002). Ethnographic research. In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 23-46). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26. Lindlof, T.R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods: Vol. 3. Current communication: An advanced text series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. MacNealy, M.S. (1999). Strategies for empirical research in writing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
28. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50-52.
29. Murphy, D.J. (2002). Surveys and questionnaires. In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 93-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
30. Paskiewicz, L.S. (2001). Pregnant adolescents and their mothers. A shared experience of teen mothering. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 26 (1). 33-38.
31. Porter, L.R., & Coggin, W. (1995). Research strategies in technical communication. New York: John Wiley.
32. PubMed [Data file]. Retrieved in 2007 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ sites/entrez
33. Rickly, R. (2007). Messy contexts: Research as a rhetorical situation. In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 377-398). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34. Savage, G.J. (2003). The process and prospects for professionalizing technical communication. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication: Vol. 1. The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 137-168). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
35. Simmons, V. (2002). Exploring inconsistent breastfeeding advice: 2. British Journal of Midwifery, 10, 616-619.
36. Spilka, R. (2000). The issue of quality in professional documentation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9, 207-220.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
38. Tuckett, A.G. (2004). Qualitative research sampling: The very real complexities. Nurse Researcher, 12 (1). 47-61.
39. Waitzkin, H. (1990). On studying the discourse of medical encounters: A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and a proposal for reasonable compromise. Medical Care, 28, 473-488.
40. Winsor, D. (2006). Using writing to structure agency: An examination of engineers' practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 411-430.