Comparison of two methods to develop breast models for simulation of breast tomosynthesis and CT

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5116 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 417-425

  O'Connor, J Michael ^a   Das, Mini ^b   Didier, Clay ^a   Mah'D, Mufeed ^c   Glick, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST IMAGING; BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIALS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; OBJECT MODELLING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL ARITHMETIC; DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; ELECTRIC INSTRUMENT TRANSFORMERS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES; PROJECTION SYSTEMS; TOMOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 50949122090     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Pisano, E.D., et al.: Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 353, 1773-1783 (2005)
2. Kerlikowske, K., et al.: Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273(2), 149-154 (1995)
3. Johns, P.C., Yaffe, M.J.: X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 32(6), 675-695 (1987)
4. Niklason, L.T., et al.: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205, 399-406 (1997)
5. Barrett, H.H., Myers, K.J.: Foundations of Image Science. John Wiley, Chichester (2003)
6. Barrett, H.H., et al.: Model observers for assessment of image quality. In: Images of Science: Science of Images, National Academy of Sciences, Washington (1992)
7. Burgess, A.E.: Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, SPIE, San Diego (1999)
8. Burgess, A.E., Jacobson, F.L., Judy, P.F.: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med. Phys. 28(4), 419-437 (2001)
9. Rowland, J.P., Barrett, H.H.: Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649-658 (1992)
10. Bakic, P.R., Albert, M.: Mammogram synthesis using 3D simulation. 1. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Med. Phys. 29(9), 2131-2139 (2002)
11. O'Connor, J.M., et al.: Characterization of a prototype table-top x-ray CT breast imaging system. In: Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, San Diego (2007)
12. Altunbas, M.C., et al.: A post-reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography. Med. Phys. 34(7), 3109-3117 (2007)
13. Vedula, A.A., Glick, S.J., Gong, X.: Computer simulation of CT mammography using a flat-panel imager. In: SPIE Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 5030, pp. 349-360 (2003)