Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 922-925

  Koupisa, Nikolaos S ^a   Eliades, Theodore ^b   Athanasiou, Athanasios E ^b  

^a Aristotle University of Thessaloniki ^*  (Greece)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bond failure rate; Light emitting diode; Tungsten quartz halogen

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949097497     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/072807-351.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:610-616.
2. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Oonsombat C. Evaluation of a new curing light on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:431-435.
3. Meyer GR, Ernst CP, Willershausen B. Decrease in power output of new light-emitting diode (LED) curing devices with increasing distance to filling surface. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4:197-204.
4. Althoff O, Hartung M. Advances in light curing. Am J Dent. 2000;13(special issue):77D-81D.
5. Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Mills RW. Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerization of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerization potential. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1379-1385.
6. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J. 1999;186:388-391.
7. Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Polymerization of orthodontic resin cement with light-emitting diode curing units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:236-241.
8. Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerisation times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:337-341.
9. Wendl B, Droschl H. A comparative in vitro study of the strength of directly bonded brackets using different curing techniques. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:535-544.
10. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33-43.
11. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13-23.
12. Elaut J, Wehrbein H. The effects of argon laser curing of a resin adhesive on bracket retention and enamel decalcifi-cation: a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:553-560.
13. Pettemerides AP, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. An in vivo study to compare a plasma arc light and a conventional quartz halogen curing light in orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:573-577.
14. Mills RW, Uhl A, Jandt KD. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs).Br Dent J. 2002;193:459-463.
15. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:197-206.
16. Lovius BBJ, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated material over an 18 month period. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:11-20.
17. Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:547-550.
18. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:348-351.
19. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:283-287.
20. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
21. Armas Galindo HR, Sadowsky PL, Vlachos C, Jacobson A, Wallace D. An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:271-275.
22. Chung CH, Piatti A. Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34:409-412.
23. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A. Plasma arc versus halogen light-curing of adhesive-precoated orthodontic brackets: a 12-month clinical study of bond failures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:194-199.
24. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:476-483.
25. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:113-117.
26. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:351-356.
27. Kula K, Schreiner R, Brown J, Glaros A. Clinical bond failure of pre-coated and operator-coated orthodontic brackets. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2002;5:161-165.
28. Garner LD, Kotwal NS. Correlation study of incisive biting forces with age, sex and anterior occlusion. J Dent Res. 1973;52:698-702.
29. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Implications of the failure rates of bonded brackets and eyelets: a clinical study. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:403-406.
30. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1982;27:383-392.